SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

POTENTIAL OF BIOSURFACTANT PRODUCTION IN BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM OIL POLLUTED SOILS

Liliya Biktasheva, Polina Galitskaya, Svetlana Selivanovskaya

First published: 2021-12-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2021/6.1/s25.29View metrics

Abstract

It is widely known that oil production processes do not usually achieve maximum efficiency. One method of increasing production is microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). MEOR methods can clean oil, increase production and clean oil-contaminated soils by not only introducing the microorganisms themselves but also the substances they produce. Among the advantages of these methods are their relative efficiency and the absence of negative impact on the environment. MEOR methods are divided into two groups the first group - ex situ - includes the injection of nutrients into a well with few or no microbes and the stimulation of their growth in the oil reservoir, the second group - in situ - includes the cultivation of microbes outside the wells to obtain microbial products (for example, biosurfactants) and the injection of these products. Biosurfactants are amphiphilic compounds that can simultaneously interact with hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules, since they are composed of polar (carbohydrates) and non-polar (fatty acids) sites. There are biosurfactants of different groups, such as surfactin, rhamnolipid, viscosin, lichenysin and others which are encoded by different groups of genes. We have carried out a screening of microorganisms capable of producing biosurfactants isolated from oil-contaminated soils. Oil-contaminated soils were sampled in the oil-producing regions of the Republic of Tatarstan (Russia). 50 strains of microorganisms were isolated, of which 15 had surfactant production capabilities. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, these bacteria were identified. It was found that three strains belonged to the Pseudomonas genus, two strains to the Rhodococcus genus, and ten strains to the Bacillus genus. Biosurfactant activity was estimated on the basis of bacterial ability to produce substances that can emulsify an oil-water mixture (E24 index). The highest E24 was registered for B. amyloliquefaciens (47.6%) while the lowest was found to be for R. erythropolis (15.6%). Furthermore, the presence of genes encoding biosurfactant production in bacteria was screened in all the fifteen strains: srfA3 and srfAA (encoding surfactin production) and rhlB (encoding rhamnolipid production). It was revealed, that srfA3 and srfAA genes were present in all ten strains of Bacillus genus (both genes in each strain). The rhlB gene was present in Pseudomonas gessardii, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Pseudomonas punonensis strains. It can be concluded that the isolates possess high potential for biosurfactant production and can be successfully used in MEOR.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
POTENTIAL OF BIOSURFACTANT PRODUCTION IN BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM OIL POLLUTED SOILS
Authors
Liliya Biktasheva, Polina Galitskaya, Svetlana Selivanovskaya
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 21st SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2021 Nano Bio Green and Space Technologies for Sustainable Future
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2021
Pages
225-232
SWS Citekey
Biktasheva202125225232
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-63-7
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Shibulal B., Al-Bahry S.N., Al-Wahaibi Y.M., Elshafie A.E., Al-Bemani A.S., Joshi S.J., Microbial enhanced heavy oil recovery by the aid of inhabitant spore-forming bacteria: An insight review, The Scientific World Journal, 2014.

  2. Nikolova C., Gutierrez T., Use of Microorganisms in the Recovery of Oil From Recalcitrant Oil Reservoirs: Current State of Knowledge, Technological Advances and Future Perspectives // Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, pp 10, 2020.

  3. Alexander M., Bioremediation and Biodegradation, Focus (Madison), vol. 32, pp 1126–1133, 1999.

  4. Franzetti A., Caredda P., Ruggeri C., Colla P. La, Tamburini E., Papacchini M., Bestetti G. Potential applications of surface active compounds by Gordonia sp. strain BS29 in soil remediation technologies, Chemosphere, vol. 75, pp 801-807, 2009.

  5. Rufino R.D., de Luna J.M., de Campos Takaki G.M., Sarubbo L.A., Characterization and properties of the biosurfactant produced by Candida lipolytica UCP 0988, Electron. J. Biotechnol., vol. 17, pp 34-38, 2014.

  6. Fenibo E.O., Douglas S.I., Stanley H.O., A Review on Microbial Surfactants: Production, Classifications, Properties and Characterization, J. Adv. Microbiol., vol. 18, pp 1-22, 2019.

  7. Niu J., Liu Q., Lv J., Peng B., Review on microbial enhanced oil recovery: Mechanisms, modeling and field trials, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 192, 2020.

  8. Mulligan C.N., Sharma S.K., Mudhoo A., Biosurfactants research trends and applications, Biosurfactants: Research Trends and Application, pp 329, 2014.

  9. Bodour A.A., Drees K.P., Maier R.M., Distribution of Biosurfactant-Producing Bacteria in Undisturbed and Contaminated Arid Southwestern Soils, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol. 69/issue 6, pp 3280–3287, 2003.

  10. Dulcey C.E., López de los Santos Y., Létourneau M., Déziel E., Doucet N., Semi-rational evolution of the 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoate (HAA) synthase RhlA to improve rhamnolipid production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia glumae, FEBS J., vol. 286, pp 4036–4059, 2019.

  11. Medina G., Juárez K., Díaz R., Soberón-Chávez G., Transcriptional regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhlR, encoding a quorum-sensing regulatory protein, Microbiology, vol. 149, pp 3073-3081, 2003.

  12. Simpson D.R., Natraj N.R., McInerney M.J., Duncan K.E., Biosurfactant-producing Bacillus are present in produced brines from Oklahoma oil reservoirs with a wide range of salinities, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., vol. 91, pp 1083-93, 2011.

  13. Zhang J., Lai H., Gao H., Hu S., Xue Q., Prevention and mitigation of paraffin deposition by biosurfactant-producing and paraffin-degrading Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain 6-2c, Chem. Eng. J., 2018.

  14. Kim D., Choi K.Y., Yoo M., Zylstra G.J., Kim E., Biotechnological potential of rhodococcus biodegradative pathways, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., vol. 28/issue 7, pp 1037–1051, 2018.

  15. De Rienzo M.A.D., Martin P.J., Effect of Mono and Di-rhamnolipids on Biofilms Pre-formed by Bacillus subtilis BBK006, Curr. Microbiol., vol. 73/issue 2, 2016.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list