SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

THE COMPARISON OF THE INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS ON GEOMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WATERSHED

Hradilek, Vaclav

First published: 2013-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2013/bc3/s12.046View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 3
PLUMX see details

Publication details

Title
THE COMPARISON OF THE INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS ON GEOMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WATERSHED
Authors
Hradilek, Vaclav
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 13th SGEM GeoConference on WATER RESOURCES. FOREST, MARINE AND OCEAN ECOSYSTEMS
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2013
Pages
365 - 372 pp
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
Not available yet
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References36

  1. Perucca L.P., Angilieri Y.E. Morphometric characterization of del Molle Basin applied to the evaluation of flash floods hazard, Quaternary International 233, Iglesia Department, San Juan, Argentina, 81e86, 2011.

  2. Dwivedi, S.Ch., Morphometric analysis of four sub-watersheds in Bahn area of Agra district using remote sensing and GIS techniques. 12th Esri India User Conference 2011, India. 2011.

  3. Patel D.P., Dholakia M.B., Naresh N., Srivastava P.K., Water Harvesting Structure Positioning by Using Geo-Visualization Concept and Prioritization of Mini-Watersheds Through Morphometric Analysis in the Lower Tapi Basin. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. (June 2012) 40(2):299– 312, 2011. Section Hydrology and Water Resources

  4. Javed A., Khandy M.Y., Ahmed R., Prioritization of Sub-watersheds basted on Morphometric and Land Use Analysis using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. J Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 37: 261-274.SCHUMM, S.A., 1956: Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Ambos. Geological Society of America Bulletin 67, 597e646, New Jersey, 2009.

  5. Pareta K., Pareta U., Quantitative Morphometric Analysis of a Watershed of Yamuna Basin,India using ASTER (DEM) Data and GIS . International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences,Volume 2, No 1, NRM & RS/GIS Division, Spatial Decisions, B-30 Kailash Colony, New Delhi, 2011.

  6. Nikolakopoulos K. G., Kamaratakis E. K., Chrysoulakis N., SRTM vs ASTER elevation products. Comparison for two regions in Crete, Greece. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006.

  7. Rabus B., Eineder M., Roth A., Bamler R. The shuttle radar topography mission —a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 57 (2003) 241– 262, 2002.

  8. Hutchinson, M.F. Calculation of hydrologically sound digital elevation models. Paper presented at Third International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling at Sydney, Australia, 1988.

  9. Hutchinson, M.F. A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data withautomatic removal of spurious pits. Journal of Hydrology 106: 211-232, 1989.

  10. Hutchinson, M. F., Dowling, T. I. A continental hydrological assessment of a new grid-based digital elevation model of Australia. Hydrological Processes, vol. 5, 45-58, 1991.

  11. Hutchinson, M. F., Gessler, P.E. Splines – more than just a smooth interpolátor. Geoderma vol. 62, 45-67, 1994.

  12. Fairchild, J., Laymarie, P. Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research. 27, 29–61, 1991.

  13. Djokic, D. Comprehensive Terrain Preprocessing Using Hydro Tools. ESRI, New York, 61 s, 2008.

  14. Horton, R. E. Drainage basin characteristics. Transaction American Geophysical Union, 13, 350–361, 1932.

  15. Horton, R. E. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin,56, 275–370, 1945.

  16. Strahler, A. N. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. Section 4-II. In V. T. Chow (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Hydrology (pp. 04 – 39), New York, 1964.

  17. Strahler A. N. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union., 38: 913-920,Vol. 27, No. 21, 10 November 2006, 4819–4838, 1957.

  18. Chorley R. J., Malm Deg, Pogorzelki H. A. A new standard for estimating drainage basin shape. Am. J. Sci., 255: 138– 141, 1957. GeoConference on Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems

  19. Perucca L.P., Angilieri Y.E. Morphometric characterization of del Molle Basin applied to the evaluation of flash floods hazard, Quaternary International 233, Iglesia Department, San Juan, Argentina, 81e86, 2011.

  20. Dwivedi, S.Ch., Morphometric analysis of four sub-watersheds in Bahn area of Agra district using remote sensing and GIS techniques. 12th Esri India User Conference 2011, India. 2011.

  21. Patel D.P., Dholakia M.B., Naresh N., Srivastava P.K., Water Harvesting Structure Positioning by Using Geo-Visualization Concept and Prioritization of Mini-Watersheds Through Morphometric Analysis in the Lower Tapi Basin. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. (June 2012) 40(2):299– 312, 2011. Section Hydrology and Water Resources

  22. Javed A., Khandy M.Y., Ahmed R., Prioritization of Sub-watersheds basted on Morphometric and Land Use Analysis using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. J Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 37: 261-274.SCHUMM, S.A., 1956: Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Ambos. Geological Society of America Bulletin 67, 597e646, New Jersey, 2009.

  23. Pareta K., Pareta U., Quantitative Morphometric Analysis of a Watershed of Yamuna Basin,India using ASTER (DEM) Data and GIS . International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences,Volume 2, No 1, NRM & RS/GIS Division, Spatial Decisions, B-30 Kailash Colony, New Delhi, 2011.

  24. Nikolakopoulos K. G., Kamaratakis E. K., Chrysoulakis N., SRTM vs ASTER elevation products. Comparison for two regions in Crete, Greece. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006.

  25. Rabus B., Eineder M., Roth A., Bamler R. The shuttle radar topography mission —a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 57 (2003) 241– 262, 2002.

  26. Hutchinson, M.F. Calculation of hydrologically sound digital elevation models. Paper presented at Third International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling at Sydney, Australia, 1988.

  27. Hutchinson, M.F. A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data withautomatic removal of spurious pits. Journal of Hydrology 106: 211-232, 1989.

  28. Hutchinson, M. F., Dowling, T. I. A continental hydrological assessment of a new grid-based digital elevation model of Australia. Hydrological Processes, vol. 5, 45-58, 1991.

  29. Hutchinson, M. F., Gessler, P.E. Splines – more than just a smooth interpolátor. Geoderma vol. 62, 45-67, 1994.

  30. Fairchild, J., Laymarie, P. Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research. 27, 29–61, 1991.

  31. Djokic, D. Comprehensive Terrain Preprocessing Using Hydro Tools. ESRI, New York, 61 s, 2008.

  32. Horton, R. E. Drainage basin characteristics. Transaction American Geophysical Union, 13, 350–361, 1932.

  33. Horton, R. E. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin,56, 275–370, 1945.

  34. Strahler, A. N. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. Section 4-II. In V. T. Chow (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Hydrology (pp. 04 – 39), New York, 1964.

  35. Strahler A. N. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union., 38: 913-920,Vol. 27, No. 21, 10 November 2006, 4819–4838, 1957.

  36. Chorley R. J., Malm Deg, Pogorzelki H. A. A new standard for estimating drainage basin shape. Am. J. Sci., 255: 138– 141, 1957. GeoConference on Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list