SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

POTENTIAL OF SAP FLOW FOR IDENTIFYING STRESS IN HORTICULTURAL CROPS

Viliam Bárek, Ján Mezey, Dušan Igaz, Oliver Obročník, Vladimír Kišš

First published: 2025-08-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2025/3.1/s11.23View metrics

Abstract

Climate change represents one of the major environmental problems of our time (IPCC, 2021), significantly affecting plant water regimes and agricultural production. Increased temperatures, prolonged droughts, and unpredictable rainfall patterns lead to reduced soil water availability (Allen et al., 1998), increasing the urgency for efficient and precise irrigation management. As traditional methods based on soil moisture or empirical models become less effective under variable climatic conditions (Jones, 2004), the use of advanced technologies to monitor real-time plant water status is gaining relevance. This study evaluates the potential of sap flow measurement using Dynagage Trunk Gages sensors (Dynamax Inc., 2007; 2020) to manage irrigation in horticultural crops, focusing on royal walnut (Juglans regia L.). These sensors work on the heat balance principle, utilizing a constant heat source and differential thermocouples to measure heat dissipation, thereby determining sap flow in units of g-h?- (Granier, 1987; Lu et al., 2004). The system allows for non-invasive, continuous monitoring without harming the plant, making it a practical tool for field applications. The experiment was conducted in 2024 in the Danube Plain region of Slovakia, one of the driest and warmest areas in the country (Atlas of the Slovak Landscape, 2020; Climate Atlas of Slovakia, 2020). Sap flow was monitored in irrigated and non-irrigated trees during two critical phenological phases: budding and flowering. Results showed that sap flow rates closely followed air temperature trends and significantly decreased under water stress, particularly in the non-irrigated variant. This supports earlier findings (Fernandez et al., 2008; Cermak et al., 2004) and confirms sap flow as a sensitive indicator of plant water stress. However, as the data reflect past rather than real-time stress responses, this method has limitations in triggering immediate irrigation decisions. Despite its temporal limitation, sap flow monitoring offers a cost-effective, scalable approach to understanding plant-water interactions. Compared to more complex systems such as transpiration modeling based on leaf area indices or remote sensing, which require extensive microclimatic data and technical resources (Fernandez et al., 2008), the sap flow method is accessible and efficient. Its integration into automated irrigation systems has the potential to improve water use efficiency and reduce ecological impacts of over-irrigation (Dynamax Inc., 2020). Furthermore, the method holds promise for adaptation to other crops and agro-ecological zones, aligning with global goals for climate-resilient and sustainable agriculture (Shao et al., 2008; Silva et al., 2009).

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 3
Dimensions ID: pub.1195348483

Publication details

Title
POTENTIAL OF SAP FLOW FOR IDENTIFYING STRESS IN HORTICULTURAL CROPS
Authors
Viliam Bárek, Ján Mezey, Dušan Igaz, Oliver Obročník, Vladimír Kišš
Proceedings
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2025, Water Resources, Forest, Marine, and Ocean Ecosystems, Vol25, Issue 3.1
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2025
Pages
187-194
SWS Citekey
Bárek202511187194
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603811
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References19
  1. IPCC, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Switzerland, 2021. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/

  2. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D. and Smith M., Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Italy, 1998. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/x0490e/x0490e00.htm

  3. Jones H.G., Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods, Journal of Experimental Botany, UK, vol 55/issue 407, 2004, pp 2427�2436. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh213

  4. Cermak J., Kucera J. and Nadeshkina O.N., Sap flow measurements with some thermodynamic methods, flow integration within trees and scaling up from sample trees to entire forest stands, Trees, Germany, vol 18, 2004, pp 529�546. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-004-0339-6

  5. Granier A., Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements, Tree Physiology, UK, vol 3/issue 4, 1987, pp 309�320. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/3.4.309

  6. Fernandez J.E., Green S.R. and Caspari H.W., The use of sap flow sensors for irrigation scheduling in woody crops: A review, Irrigation Science, Germany, vol 26, 2008, pp 153�170. DOI: 10.1007/s00271-007-0086-0

  7. Lu P., Urban L. and Zhang L., Granier's thermal dissipation probe (TDP) method for measuring sap flow in trees: theory and practice, Acta Botanica Sinica, China, vol 46/issue 6, 2004, pp 631�646.

  8. DYNAMAX Inc., Dynagage Sap Flow Sensors User Manual, DYNAMAX Inc., USA, 2020. Available from: https://dynamax.com/product/dynagage-sap-flow-sensors/

  9. NOAA, Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA, 2023. Available from: https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide

  10. Portela M.M., Pereira L.S. and Andrade C.F., Defining and assessing drought risk in irrigated agriculture, Agricultural Water Management, Netherlands, vol 155, 2015, pp 19�33. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.019

  11. Silva J.M., Ramos M.M. and Loureiro I.C., Water stress and physiological behaviour of plants, International Journal of Environmental Science, India, vol 5/issue 3, 2009, pp 201�209.

  12. Chavarria G. and Santos H.P., Plant water relations: Water transport in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agr�cola e Ambiental, Brazil, vol 16/issue 6, 2012, pp 658�664. DOI: 10.1590/S1415-43662012000600013

  13. Nobel P.S., Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology, 4th ed., Academic Press, Netherlands, 2009. ISBN 978-0-12-374143-1.

  14. Shao H.B., Chu L.Y., Jia X.H. and Chuan C.J., Plant responses to drought stress and the strategies for improving drought resistance, African Journal of Biotechnology, Kenya, vol 7/issue 25, 2008, pp 5966�5976.

  15. DYNAMAX Inc., Flow32-1K Sap Flow System, DYNAMAX Inc., USA, 2020. Available from: https://dynamax.com/product/flow32-1k-sap-flow-system/

  16. Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic and SA�P, ATLAS countries of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia, 2020. ISBN 80-88833-27-2.

  17. SHM�, CLIMATE ATLAS of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia, 2020. ISBN 80-88907-37-4.

  18. Navara J., Royal walnut � Juglans regia, In: unknown editor, SPU Nitra, Slovakia, 2010, pp 108�115.

  19. Roger J., Walnut: History, cultivation and uses, Botanical Heritage Series, UK, 2004. ISBN 1-888888-88-1.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list