SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

AN ADJUSTMENT OF PRECISE LEVELLING NETWORK BY ERROR FACTOR ASSUMPTION-FREE WEIGHTS

Christina Mickrenska, Vasil Cvetkov

First published: 2025-08-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2025/2.1/s08.10View metrics

Abstract

This paper discusses the relevance of the classical adjustment weights for the highest-order geometric levelling network. The commonly used weights are inversely proportional to the length of levelling lines. The argument behind this choice is the assumption that the accuracy of measured elevations is a function of the square root of the levelled route. Therefore, the longer the line, the less its weight in the adjustment of the network. However, there are often events where the measured elevations of long lines are more accurate than those of shorter ones. Thus, the classical weights do not correctly reflect the accuracy of the measured height differences and are a reason for incorrect final results and conclusions concerning the investigated processes by the adjusted network. Try to avoid this issue, we recommend weights that correspond to the actual line elevation accuracy. They are assumption-free weights regarding the factors that are supposed to form height differences uncertainty. Using the Jackknife procedure, we performed n-number independent adjustments of the Bulgarian Second Levelling network /1953-1957/, where n is the number of levelling lines in the network. We skipped a different levelling line in each adjustment and calculated the averages of the produced standard errors of the adjusted benchmark heights. We used these averages to define the proposed line height difference weights. The comparison between samples of the standard errors of the adjusted benchmark heights, obtained by the proposed weights and the classical ones, shows that the former produce more accurate results than the latter. The conclusion is made at a significance level higher than 90%. Furthermore, the differences between the adjusted benchmark heights by both approaches, regarding some benchmarks, go beyond 20 mm. These differences are too much when considering the recent vertical movements in Bulgaria or establishing a state height reference system. We recommend including the proposed weighting method in the specifications for levelling data processing. Their usage can likely increase the state levelling network accuracy, but also explain a part of the -mysterious- systematic deteriorations of the state and continental reference systems.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 1
Dimensions ID: pub.1195348443

Publication details

Title
AN ADJUSTMENT OF PRECISE LEVELLING NETWORK BY ERROR FACTOR ASSUMPTION-FREE WEIGHTS
Authors
Christina Mickrenska, Vasil Cvetkov
Proceedings
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2025, Geoinformatics, Remote Sensing, and Artificial Intelligence (AI), Vol 25, Issue 2.1
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2025
Pages
73-80
SWS Citekey
Mickrenska202587380
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603897
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References8
  1. Saaranen V., Lehmuskoski P., Takalo M., Rouhiainen P., The Third Precise Levelling of Finland. FGI Publications No. 161, Kirkkonummi, 2021, ISBN 978-951-48-0266-9 (print), ISSN 2342-7353 (online)

  2. K��ri�inen E., The Second Levelling of Finland in 1935�1955, Publications of the Finnish Geodetic Institute No. 61, (1966), Helsinki.

  3. Gerlach G., Rummel R., Benefit of classical leveling for geoid-based vertical reference frames. J Geod 98, 64 (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s00190-024-01849-y

  4. Specifications for precise levelling I and II order, GUGK, 1980, Sofia, (in Bulgarian)

  5. Instruction ? RD�02�20�1 since 15 January 2021 for the establishment and maintenance of the State Levelling Network, Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works, 2021, (in Bulgarian)

  6. Mickrenska C., Cvetkov V., Multiple Regression in Help of the Precise Levelling. World Summit: Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Congress (CAUSummit 2024) ARPHA Proceedings 7, Pensoft Publishing, Sofia, 2024, pp. 65-71, DOI: 10.3897/ap.7.e0065

  7. Cvetkov V., Two adjustments of the second levelling of Finland by using nonconventional weights, Journal of Geodetic Science, vol. 13, no. 1, (2023), pp. 20220148, DOI: 10.1515/jogs-2022-0148

  8. Penna N. T., Featherstone W. E., Gazeaux J., Bingham R. J., The apparent British sea slope is caused by systematic errors in the levelling-based vertical datum, Geophysical Journal International, Volume 194, Issue 2, August 2013, Pages 772�786, DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt161 [9]Higginson S., Thompson K. R., Woodworth P. L., Hughes C. W., The tilt of mean sealevel along the east coast of North America, Geophys Res Lett 42(5):1471�1479, (2015),https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063186 [10]Djorova S., Geologically conditioned method of adjustment of ? gravimetricnetwork, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol.1427, Issue 1,Article number 012003, (2024), https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1427/1/012003

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list