Scholarly record
HOW ORGANIZATIONAL MATRIX STRUCTURE CAN IMPACT IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUCCESS
Abstract
This paper will explore the characteristics of matrix structures and their relationships with project success managers, such as quality of communication, collaboration, support in problem solving and the effectiveness of project management among project team members. The matrix characteristics that were expected to be positively related to project success are mainly related to success leaders. However, the characteristics that are expected to negatively impact project success did not indicate such significant relationships; some even positively relate to success leaders. Manager?s success in turn positively correlated with perceived project success. The treated model discloses the effects of matrix characteristics on the drivers of their ultimate success and efficiency and project performance. The main objective of this paper is to clarify the effect of how organizational structures can increase the effectiveness of the organization projects. Achieving this goal for the realization of the paper is done through the collection of primary data produced through a survey done, as the primary method of data collection. The objective of the questionnaire has been receiving information about the design of the organizational structure at the corporate level and at the business unit level and level of relational of structure with project management success.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References14
Galbraith, JR. Matrix organisation designs: How to combine functional and project forms. Business Horizons, 1978, 17(1), pp. 29-40.
Greenberg, J. Behavior in Organizations. University of Texas at Arlington, 10th Edition, Pearson, 2011.
Robbins, S. & Coulter, M. Management. Printice Hall, 11th Edition, 2011.
Turner, J. R. & M?ller, R. On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 2003, 21, pp. 1-8.
Larson, E. W. & Gobeli, D. H. Matrix management: Contradictions and insights. California Management Review, 1987, 29, pp. 126-138.
Ford, R. C. & Randolph, W. A. Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. Journal of Management, 1992, 18(2), pp. 267-294.
Gray, C., Dworatschek, S., Gobeli, D., Knoepfel, H. & Larson, E. International comparison of project organization structures: Use and effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 1990, 8(1), pp. 26-32.
Hobday, M. The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 2000, 29, pp. 871-893.
Davis, S. M. & Lawrence, P. R. Problems of matrix organisations. Harvard Business Review, 1978, pp. 131-142.
Bannerman, P. L. Structuring risk into projects. PMI Research and Education Conference, Washington DC, 2010.
Galbraith JR. The Multi-Dimensional and Reconfigurable Organization. Organizational Dynamics, 2010, 39(2), pp. 115-125.
Certo, S. & Certo, T. MODERN MANAGEMENT, Concepts and Skills, Twelfth Edition, 2012.
Chung-Jen, C., & Jing-Wen, H. How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge. International Journal of Information Management, 2007, 27, p. 104-118.
Dessein, W. Authority and Communication in Organizations. Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69, pp. 811-838
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

