SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

BIOACTIVATION OF LEACHING SOLUTION FOR URANIUM IN-SITU RECOVERY

Yerkin Bektay, Gaukhar Turysbekova, Erzhan Mukanov, Akmurat Altynbek, Bauyrzhan Shiderin

First published: 2022-11-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/1.1/s03.024View metrics

Abstract

Technology of in-situ recovery (ISR) of uranium is using in Kazakhstan for increasing of production 15 times from 800 ton in 1998 till 22 000 ton in 2013. This ISR process is zero wastes technology. Investigations showed serious potential to improve results of ISR technology using biotechnology methods. Uranium in the ore body is usually presented as hexavalent (soluble) and tetravalent uranium (slightly soluble). To convert uranium into a soluble form, it is necessary to oxidize tetravalent uranium. Leaching solution of most of the uranium deposits of Kazakhstan contains ferrous iron. Oxidation of tetravalent uranium was obtained by the formation of ferric iron by iron-oxidizing bacteria A.Ferrooxidans. This bacteria oxidize ferrous iron till ferric iron. This was done at a uranium mine in two 20 m3 a flow bioreactors of new construction. In bioreactors was get activated leaching solution where take place oxidizing of ferrous iron. The redox of the leaching solution rose from 360 mV to 430-450 mV in bioreactors. The content of ferric iron increased from 0.1 g/l to 1.5 g/l and higher. Temperature of leaching solution was 10-140C in order to decrease cost for heating. Concentration of uranium in the productive solution increased by 20 % without adding additional sulfuric acid. Test with additional sulfuric acid give 40 % increasing of concentration of uranium in production solution. The costs of using the technology are 6-8 times lower in comparison with using chemical oxidizers (hydrogen peroxide).

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 5

Publication details

Title
BIOACTIVATION OF LEACHING SOLUTION FOR URANIUM IN-SITU RECOVERY
Authors
Yerkin Bektay, Gaukhar Turysbekova, Erzhan Mukanov, Akmurat Altynbek, Bauyrzhan Shiderin
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference- EXPO Proceedings; 22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2022, Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration And Mining
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2022
Pages
217-224
SWS Citekey
Bektay20223217224
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-38-5
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References11
  1. Polkin S.I., Adamov E.V. , Panin V.V. Technology of bacterial leaching of nonferrous and rare metals. - M .: Nedra. 1982 .-- 288 p.

  2. Hamidian H., Rezai B., Milani S. et al.Microbial leaching of uranium ore. // Asian J. Chem. 2009.V. 21. P. 5808-5820

  3. Guay R., Silver M., Torma E. Microbiological leaching of a low-grade uranium ore by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. // Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1976. V. 3. P. 157-167 DOI: 10.1007/bf00928434

  4. Tuovinen O., Bhatti T. Microbiological leaching of uranium ores. // Miner. Metall. Proc. 1999.V. 16. P. 51-60 DOI: 10.1007/bf03403234

  5. Munoz J., Gonzalez F., Blazquez M., Ballester A. A study of the bioleaching of a Spanish uranium ore. Part I: A review of the bacterial leaching in the treatment of uranium ores. // Hydrometallurgy. 1995. V. 38. P. 39-57 DOI: 10.1016/0304-386x(94)00039-6

  6. Brierley C., Briggs A. Selection and sizing of biooxidation equipment and circuits. / Mineralprocessing plant design, practice and control. Ed. A. Mular, D. Halbe, D. Barret. / SME. 2002. P. 1540-1568

  7. Cerda J.. Gonzalez S., Rios J., Quintana T. Uranium concentrates bioproduction in Spain: a case study. // FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1993. V. 11. P. 253-260 DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00292.x

  8. Benedetto J., de Almeida S., Gomes H., Vazoller R. Monitoring of sulfate-reducing bacteria inacid water from uranium mines. // Miner. Eng. 2005. V. 18. P. 1341-1343 DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2005.08.012

  9. McCready R., Gould W. Bioleaching of uranium. / Microbial mineral recovery. Ed. H. Ehrlich,C. Brierley. / McGraw-Hill. N. Y. 1990. P. 107-126.

  10. Campbell K., Gallegos T., Landa E. Biogeochemical aspects of uranium mineralization, mining,milling, and remediation. // Appl. Geochem. 2015. V. 57. P. 206�235 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.07.022

  11. Watling H. Review of biohydrometallurgical metals extraction from polymetallic mineral resources. // Minerals. 2015. V. 5. N 1. P. 1-60 DOI: 10.3390/min5010001

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list