SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF MANAGING SECONDARY WASTE FROM INCINERATION PLANT IN CONCRETE - CARBON FOOTPRINT AND ABIOTIC DEPLETION.

Nikolina Poranek, Beata Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk, Krzysztof ikon

First published: 2023-12-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023v/6.2/s26.62View metrics

Abstract

The use of secondary waste from municipal solid waste incineration plant in concrete has been studied for its potential to reduce the carbon footprint and abiotic depletion associated with traditional concrete production. Fly ash is a hazardous waste and it can be used as a substitute for cement in the production of concrete. Bottom ash can be used as a substitute for light natural aggregate, which was previously soaked in water for internal treatment of concrete. The composition of concrete includes: CEM I 42.5R, CSA, basalt, sand, zeolite, additives and admixtures. Studies have shown that concrete with secondary waste can decrease CO2 emissions and abiotic depletion compared to traditional concrete. In the article 4 scenarios are introduced (1 - concrete with fly ash, 2 - concrete with bottom ash, 3 - concrete with both secondary waste, 4 - reference concrete). The tests were performed for 1 kg of concrete, in the cradle-to-gate range, excluding transport. 4th scenario has the biggest carbon footprint and abiotic depletion influence. The least impact on environmental has 3rd scenario. Closing the loop by managing secondary waste in concrete fits into Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Goals, especially in SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production and SDG13 - Climate Action.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 7

Publication details

Title
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF MANAGING SECONDARY WASTE FROM INCINERATION PLANT IN CONCRETE - CARBON FOOTPRINT AND ABIOTIC DEPLETION.
Authors
Nikolina Poranek, Beata Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk, Krzysztof ikon
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference- EXPO Proceedings; 23rd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2023, Nano, Bio, Green and Space: Technologies for a Sustainable Future, Vol. 23, Issue 6.2
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2023
Pages
501-506
SWS Citekey
Poranek202326501506
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-66-8
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References17
  1. H. Birgisdottir, G. Bhander, M. Z. Hauschild, and T. H. Christensen, �Life cycleassessment of disposal of residues from municipal solid waste incineration:Recycling of bottom ash in road construction or landfilling in Denmark evaluatedin the ROAD-RES model,� Waste Management, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. S75�S84, 2007,DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.016.

  2. �The EU Green Deal � a roadmap to sustainable economies.� Accessed: Aug. 20,2021.[Online]. Available: https://www.switchtogreen.eu/the-eu-green-deal-promoting-a-green-notable-circular-economy/?fbclid=IwAR3Qjwk5f6D-OQGlSniG0iZSE8uACoVsI4fkEeTs6RsH38GCG-FcN6nAZdE

  3. A. Wajda, �Management of wastes from energy industry in the frame of circulareconomy on the example of microspheres,� International MultidisciplinaryScientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management,SGEM, vol. 18, no. 4.3, pp. 71�78, 2018, DOI: 10.5593/SGEM2018V/4.3/S05.009.

  4. M. Kajda-Szczesniak, T. Jaworski, and A. Wajda, �Theoretical and experimentalmodel of the combustion process in a layer on the grate of the waste thermaltreatment installation,� International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferenceSurveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, vol. 19, no. 5.2,pp. 759�766, 2019, DOI: 10.5593/SGEM2019/5.2/S20.095.

  5. �Deloitte. Raport: Closed loop - open opportunities.� Accessed: Nov. 20, 2021.[Online]. Available: https://www2.deloitte.com/pl/pl/pages/zarzadzania-procesami-i-strategiczne/articles/innowacje/raport-zamkniety-obieg-otwarte-mozliwosci.html

  6. �Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy.� Accessed: Sep.19, 2021.[Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1453384154337&uri=CELEX:52015DC0614

  7. N. Poranek, B. Lazniewska-Piekarczyk, A. Czajkowski, and K. Pikon,�Possibilities of Management of Fly Ash from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Plant in Building Industry in the Circular Economy,� IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng,vol. 1203, no. 3, p. 032087, Nov. 2021, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1203/3/032087.

  8. N. Poranek, B. Lazniewska-Piekarczyk, A. Czajkowski, and K. Pikon, �CircularEconomy for Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash (MSWIBA)Management in Mortars with CSA and CEM I, MSWIBA Glassy Phase, andDTG,� Energies 2022, Vol. 15, Page 135, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 135, Dec. 2021, DOI: 10.3390/EN15010135.

  9. A. C. J. Franze, �Social and environmental LCA of an ecolabeled notebook |Semantic Scholar.� Accessed: Oct. 21, 2022.[Online]. Available:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Social-and-environmental-LCA-of-an-ecolabeled-Franze-Ciroth/b6e6fdeeb076550ad6ea73518c352f964873145e

  10. A. Czajkowski et al., �Global Water Crisis: Concept of a New Interactive ShowerPanel Based on IoT and Cloud Computing for Rational Water Consumption,�Applied Sciences 2021, Vol. 11, Page 4081, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 4081, Apr. 2021, DOI: 10.3390/APP11094081.

  11. P. Lehner, M. Hornakova, J. Pizon, and J. Golaszewski, �Effect of ChemicalAdmixtures on Mechanical and Degradation Properties of Metallurgical SludgeWaste Concrete,� Materials 2022, Vol. 15, Page 8287, vol. 15, no. 23, p. 8287,Nov. 2022, DOI: 10.3390/MA15238287.

  12. J. Pizon, J. Golaszewski, M. Alwaeli, and P. Szwan, �Properties of Concrete withRecycled Concrete Aggregate Containing Metallurgical Sludge Waste,� Materials2020, Vol. 13, Page 1448, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1448, Mar. 2020, DOI: 10.3390/MA13061448.

  13. A. Czajkowski, A. Wajda, N. Poranek, S. Bhadoria, and L. Remiorz, �Predictionof the Market of End-of-Life Photovoltaic Panels in the Context of Common EUManagement System,� Energies 2023, Vol. 16, Page 284, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 284,Dec. 2022, DOI: 10.3390/EN16010284.

  14. B. Soust-verdaguer et al., �Review of visualising LCA results in the design processof buildings,� vol. 190, no. August 2020, 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107530.

  15. J. Turk, Z. Cotic, A. Mladenovic, and A. Sajna, �Environmental evaluation ofgreen concretes versus conventional concrete by means of LCA,� WasteManagement, vol. 45, pp. 194�205, Nov. 2015, DOI: 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2015.06.035.

  16. A. E. Schwarz, T. N. Ligthart, D. Godoi Bizarro, P. De Wild, B. Vreugdenhil, andT. Van Harmelen, �Plastic recycling in a circular economy; determiningenvironmental performance through an LCA matrix model approach�, DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.020.

  17. C. Lausselet, K. M. Lund, and H. Bratteb, �LCA and scenario analysis of a Norwegiannet-zero GHG emission neighbourhood: The importance of mobility and surplusenergy from PV technologies,� vol. 189, no. June 2020, 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107528.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list