Scholarly record
DISAGREEMENTS BETWEEN LEGAL ACTS REGULATING ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USE AND PROTECTION OF LAND IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRUNK PIPELINES
Abstract
The article reveals the types of negative impact on land and soil in the construction of pipelines and discusses the regulatory problems in the field of reclamation of disturbed lands. To this end, the legal acts of Federal legislation, as well as the main regulatory and technical documentation in the field of environmental protection in the construction of trunk pipelines are studied. The main legal conflicts of legal regulation of environmental activities are identified. In particular, the analysis of environmental legislation has found that measures for the reclamation of disturbed and contaminated land should be reflected in a separate document - the project of land reclamation, the development and approval of which are required for the construction of pipelines. But the Law on environmental protection does not explicitly require the development and approval of a "land reclamation project". The law on environmental protection operates only with the concept of" projects for the restoration of contaminated land", which do not guarantee the implementation of land reclamation works. The proposals formulated in the article can be used as a basis for the development of new theoretical models for improving environmental legislation, as well as for other research in the field of legal regulation of environmental protection in the construction of trunk pipelines. The practical significance of the study is determined by the possibility of using the findings and recommendations in law-making, law enforcement practice of public authorities, law enforcement agencies.
Publication Impact Profile
- Citations
- CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 4
- Scopus - Citation Indexes: 4
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 2
Publication details
References0
Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.
Citing literature
Number of times cited according to Crossref: 4
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.