SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

HG REDUCTION POTENTIAL IN COAL CLEANING PROCESSES A FEW CASE STUDIES

Eng.

First published: 2015https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2015/b13/s3.048View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2
PLUMX see details

Publication details

Title
HG REDUCTION POTENTIAL IN COAL CLEANING PROCESSES A FEW CASE STUDIES
Authors
Eng.
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2015, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGIES IN GEOLOGY, EXPLORATION AND MINING
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2015
Pages
369-376
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-33-9
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References30

  1. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2014, bp.com/statisticalreview.

  2. IEA Statistics. Energy Balances of OECD Countries, 2014 Edition.

  3. SWAINE D.J. Why trace elements are important. Fuel Processing Technology, -66, 21-33, 2000.

  4. SLOSS L. L., 2012, Legislation, standards and methods for mercury emissions control. CCC/195. London, UK, IEA Clean Coal Centre.

  5. UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME (UNEP). The Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment: Sources, Emissions and Transport, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008, http://www.chem.unep.ch International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences SGEM2015

  6. UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME. Process Optimization Guidance for Reducing Mercury Emissions from Coal Combustion in Power Plants. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE) Chemicals Branch Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.

  7. PAVLISH J.H., SONDREAL E.A., MANN M.D., OLSON E.S., GALBREATH K.C., LAUDAL D.L., BENSON S.A. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Processing Technology 82, 89– 165, 2003.

  8. DAS T.B., PAL S.K., GOURICHARAN T., SHARMA K.K., CHOUDHURY A., Evaluation of Reduction Potential of Selected Heavy Metals from and Indian Coal by Conventional Coal Cleaning. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 33, 300-312, 2013.

  9. DZIOK T., STRUGAŁA A., ROZWADOWSKI A. GÓRECKI J., ZIOMBER S. Changes of mercury content in hard coal during a cleaning process. Polityka Energetyczna Vol.17, Issue 4, 277-288 , 2014 (in Polish).

  10. Guangqian Luo, Jingjing Ma, Jun Han, Hong Yao, Minghou X, Cheng Zhang, Gang Chen, Rajenda Gupta, Zhenghe Xu., 2013, Hg occurrence in coal and its removal before coal utilization. Fuel, 104, 70–76.

  11. HUGGINS F.E., SEIDU L.B.A., SHAH N., HUFFMAN G.P., HONAKER R.Q., KYGER J.R., HIGGINS B.L. Elemental modes of occurrence in an Illinois #6 coal and fractions prepared by physical separation techniques at a coal preparation plant. International Journal of Coal Geology 78, 65– 76, 2009.

  12. LÓPEZ-ANTÓN M. A., DI’AZ -SOMOANO M., GARCI’A, A.B., MARTI’NEZ-TARAZONA M.R. Evaluation of mercury associations in two coals of different rank using physical separation procedures. Fuel 85, 1389 – 1395, 2006.

  13. MASTALERZ M., DROBNIAK A., 2005, Vertical variations of mercury in Pennsylvanian coal beds from Indiana. International Journal of Coal Geology 63, 36– 57.

  14. OZBAYOGLU G. Removal of hazardous air pollutants based on commercial coal preparation data. Physicochem. Probl . Miner. Process. 49(2), 621−629, 2013.

  15. PYKA I., WIERZCHOWSKI K. Technological Conditions of Mercury Content Reduction in Hard Coal Based on the ROM Coal from Several Polish Collieries. Arch. Min. Sci., Vol. 55, 2, 349–371, 2010. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

  16. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2014, bp.com/statisticalreview.

  17. IEA Statistics. Energy Balances of OECD Countries, 2014 Edition.

  18. SWAINE D.J. Why trace elements are important. Fuel Processing Technology, -66, 21-33, 2000.

  19. SLOSS L. L., 2012, Legislation, standards and methods for mercury emissions control. CCC/195. London, UK, IEA Clean Coal Centre.

  20. UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME (UNEP). The Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment: Sources, Emissions and Transport, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008, http://www.chem.unep.ch International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences SGEM2015

  21. UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME. Process Optimization Guidance for Reducing Mercury Emissions from Coal Combustion in Power Plants. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE) Chemicals Branch Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.

  22. PAVLISH J.H., SONDREAL E.A., MANN M.D., OLSON E.S., GALBREATH K.C., LAUDAL D.L., BENSON S.A. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Processing Technology 82, 89– 165, 2003.

  23. DAS T.B., PAL S.K., GOURICHARAN T., SHARMA K.K., CHOUDHURY A., Evaluation of Reduction Potential of Selected Heavy Metals from and Indian Coal by Conventional Coal Cleaning. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 33, 300-312, 2013.

  24. DZIOK T., STRUGAŁA A., ROZWADOWSKI A. GÓRECKI J., ZIOMBER S. Changes of mercury content in hard coal during a cleaning process. Polityka Energetyczna Vol.17, Issue 4, 277-288 , 2014 (in Polish).

  25. Guangqian Luo, Jingjing Ma, Jun Han, Hong Yao, Minghou X, Cheng Zhang, Gang Chen, Rajenda Gupta, Zhenghe Xu., 2013, Hg occurrence in coal and its removal before coal utilization. Fuel, 104, 70–76.

  26. HUGGINS F.E., SEIDU L.B.A., SHAH N., HUFFMAN G.P., HONAKER R.Q., KYGER J.R., HIGGINS B.L. Elemental modes of occurrence in an Illinois #6 coal and fractions prepared by physical separation techniques at a coal preparation plant. International Journal of Coal Geology 78, 65– 76, 2009.

  27. LÓPEZ-ANTÓN M. A., DI’AZ -SOMOANO M., GARCI’A, A.B., MARTI’NEZ-TARAZONA M.R. Evaluation of mercury associations in two coals of different rank using physical separation procedures. Fuel 85, 1389 – 1395, 2006.

  28. MASTALERZ M., DROBNIAK A., 2005, Vertical variations of mercury in Pennsylvanian coal beds from Indiana. International Journal of Coal Geology 63, 36– 57.

  29. OZBAYOGLU G. Removal of hazardous air pollutants based on commercial coal preparation data. Physicochem. Probl . Miner. Process. 49(2), 621−629, 2013.

  30. PYKA I., WIERZCHOWSKI K. Technological Conditions of Mercury Content Reduction in Hard Coal Based on the ROM Coal from Several Polish Collieries. Arch. Min. Sci., Vol. 55, 2, 349–371, 2010. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list