SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND LIVESTOCK ANIMAL WELFARE: THE CASE OF THE DAIRY COW

Carla Zarbà, Gioacchino Pappalardo, Gaetano Chinnici, Roberta Selvaggi, Biagio Pecorino

First published: 2023-12-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023v/6.2/s29.96View metrics

Abstract

Technological devices, which promote animal welfare in livestock farming and contribute to a reduction in environmental impact, have known increasing interest in the European Union (EU). For dairy cows, the contact technologies (sensors) on the body of animals not only facilitate animal welfare, but also support the milk productivity and better quality, thus economic production efficiency. According with available statistical data, showing a boost on productivity, the aim of the present work was to test whether the increase in the realised levels of raw milk could derive from technological factors. To validate this hypothesis a study on the evolutionary development of the reported statistical indicators of the two biologically related variables (cow, raw milk) was presented. The method chosen, made statistically significant, i.e. comparable in the statistical unit of measurement (coefficient of variation) to establish the strength of the linear relationship between the two variables and the corresponding evolution r2, relied on the intensity of the correlation (correlation coefficient r) between two statistical indicators, dairy cattle (independent variable) and raw milk (dependent variable). The results showed that EU quantity of raw cows-s milk realised in EU dairy farms, even in the presence of breaking events, never stopped growing. The representation of the variables- trends showed, a part of an exception, situations where the respective evolution were not perfectly linear between them. The values of the determination coefficient r2, from 2012-2016 to 2017-2021, in most of the Countries examined decreased. Thus, there were increases in cow-s milk, which conclusively could also be attributed to the adoption of digital devices and specifically to the contact sensors on the cow-s body adopted to ensure animal welfare, to optimize the use of production factors and to detect animal-s physiological activities.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 4

Publication details

Title
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND LIVESTOCK ANIMAL WELFARE: THE CASE OF THE DAIRY COW
Authors
Carla Zarbà, Gioacchino Pappalardo, Gaetano Chinnici, Roberta Selvaggi, Biagio Pecorino
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference- EXPO Proceedings; 23rd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2023, Nano, Bio, Green and Space: Technologies for a Sustainable Future, Vol. 23, Issue 6.2
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2023
Pages
779-789
SWS Citekey
Zarba202329779789
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-66-8
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References14
  1. Sudhakaran V. A., Minj J., Basic Facts About Dairy Processing and Technologies.In: Minj, J., Sudhakaran V, A., Kumari, A. (eds) Dairy Processing: Advanced Researchto Applications. Springer, 2020, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-2608-4_1

  2. Grodkowski G., Sakowski T., Puppel K., Baars T., Comparison of differentapplications of automatic herd control systems on dairy farms, Journal of the Science ofFood and Agriculture, vol. 98(14), pp 5181-5188, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9194

  3. Poczta W., Sredzinska J,. Chenczke. M., Economic situation of dairy farms inidentified. Clusters of European Union Countries, Agriculture, vol. 10, 92. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10040092

  4. Abeni F., Petrera F., Galli A., A Survey of Italian Dairy Farmers� Propensity forPrecision Livestock Farming Tools�, Animals, vol. 9(5), 202, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ani9050202

  5. Dematteis G., Per una geografia della territorialita attiva e dei valori territoriali�,SLoT, P. Bonora (a cura), Baskerville, 2001, Bologna.

  6. Groeneveld A., Peerlings J., Bakker M., Heijman W., The effect of milk quotaabolishment on farm intensity: Shifts and stabilityNJAS - Wageningen Journal of LifeSciences, vol. 77, pp 25�37, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.003

  7. Jongeneel R., Gonzalez-Martinez A., EU Dairy after the Quota Abolition: InelasticAsymmetric Price Responsiveness and Adverse Milk Supply during Crisis Time,Agriculture, vol 12, 1985, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12121985

  8. Litvina N.I., Dolgova E.A., Litvina N.V., Innovative development of cattle breeding:status, problems and prospects, IOP Conference Series: Earth and EnvironmentalScience, vol. 650(1), 012027, 2021 DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/650/1/012027

  9. Warner D., Vasseur E., Robichaud M.V., Lefebvre D.M., Lacroix R., Developmentof a Benchmarking Tool for Dairy Herd Management Using Routinely Collected HerdRecords, Animals, vol. 10(9), 1689, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ani10091689

  10. Singh A.K., Bhakat C., Ghosh M.K., Dutta T.K., Technologies used at advanceddairy farms for optimizing the performance of dairy animals: A review, Spanish Journalof Agricultural Research, vol. 19(4), e05R01, 2021. DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2021194-17801

  11. Ramin M., Fant P., Huhtanen P., 2021, The effects of gradual replacement ofbarley with oats on enteric methane emissions, rumen fermentation, milk production,and energy utilization in dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 104(5), pp 5617�5630, 2021. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19644

  12. Kiesse T.S., Corson M.S., Wilfart A., Analysis of milk production and greenhousegas emissions as a function of extreme variations in forage production among Frenchdairy farms, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 307(1), 114537, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114537

  13. Dallago G.M., Kevin W.M., Cue R.I., McClure J.T., Lacroix R., Pellerin D.,Vasseur E., Keeping Dairy Cows for Longer: A Critical Literature Review on DairyCow Longevity in High Milk-Producing Countries, Animals, 11(3), 808, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ani11030808

  14. Palladino R.A., Buckley F., Prendiville R., Murphy J. J., Callan J., Kenny D.A., Acomparison between Holstein-Friesian and Jersey dairy cows and their F1 hybrid onmilk fatty acid composition under grazing conditions, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 93,pp 2176-2184, 2010. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2453

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list