Scholarly record
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND LIVESTOCK ANIMAL WELFARE: THE CASE OF THE DAIRY COW
Abstract
Technological devices, which promote animal welfare in livestock farming and contribute to a reduction in environmental impact, have known increasing interest in the European Union (EU). For dairy cows, the contact technologies (sensors) on the body of animals not only facilitate animal welfare, but also support the milk productivity and better quality, thus economic production efficiency. According with available statistical data, showing a boost on productivity, the aim of the present work was to test whether the increase in the realised levels of raw milk could derive from technological factors. To validate this hypothesis a study on the evolutionary development of the reported statistical indicators of the two biologically related variables (cow, raw milk) was presented. The method chosen, made statistically significant, i.e. comparable in the statistical unit of measurement (coefficient of variation) to establish the strength of the linear relationship between the two variables and the corresponding evolution r2, relied on the intensity of the correlation (correlation coefficient r) between two statistical indicators, dairy cattle (independent variable) and raw milk (dependent variable). The results showed that EU quantity of raw cows-s milk realised in EU dairy farms, even in the presence of breaking events, never stopped growing. The representation of the variables- trends showed, a part of an exception, situations where the respective evolution were not perfectly linear between them. The values of the determination coefficient r2, from 2012-2016 to 2017-2021, in most of the Countries examined decreased. Thus, there were increases in cow-s milk, which conclusively could also be attributed to the adoption of digital devices and specifically to the contact sensors on the cow-s body adopted to ensure animal welfare, to optimize the use of production factors and to detect animal-s physiological activities.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References14
Sudhakaran V. A., Minj J., Basic Facts About Dairy Processing and Technologies.In: Minj, J., Sudhakaran V, A., Kumari, A. (eds) Dairy Processing: Advanced Researchto Applications. Springer, 2020, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-2608-4_1
Grodkowski G., Sakowski T., Puppel K., Baars T., Comparison of differentapplications of automatic herd control systems on dairy farms, Journal of the Science ofFood and Agriculture, vol. 98(14), pp 5181-5188, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9194
Poczta W., Sredzinska J,. Chenczke. M., Economic situation of dairy farms inidentified. Clusters of European Union Countries, Agriculture, vol. 10, 92. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10040092
Abeni F., Petrera F., Galli A., A Survey of Italian Dairy Farmers� Propensity forPrecision Livestock Farming Tools�, Animals, vol. 9(5), 202, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ani9050202
Dematteis G., Per una geografia della territorialita attiva e dei valori territoriali�,SLoT, P. Bonora (a cura), Baskerville, 2001, Bologna.
Groeneveld A., Peerlings J., Bakker M., Heijman W., The effect of milk quotaabolishment on farm intensity: Shifts and stabilityNJAS - Wageningen Journal of LifeSciences, vol. 77, pp 25�37, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.003
Jongeneel R., Gonzalez-Martinez A., EU Dairy after the Quota Abolition: InelasticAsymmetric Price Responsiveness and Adverse Milk Supply during Crisis Time,Agriculture, vol 12, 1985, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12121985
Litvina N.I., Dolgova E.A., Litvina N.V., Innovative development of cattle breeding:status, problems and prospects, IOP Conference Series: Earth and EnvironmentalScience, vol. 650(1), 012027, 2021 DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/650/1/012027
Warner D., Vasseur E., Robichaud M.V., Lefebvre D.M., Lacroix R., Developmentof a Benchmarking Tool for Dairy Herd Management Using Routinely Collected HerdRecords, Animals, vol. 10(9), 1689, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ani10091689
Singh A.K., Bhakat C., Ghosh M.K., Dutta T.K., Technologies used at advanceddairy farms for optimizing the performance of dairy animals: A review, Spanish Journalof Agricultural Research, vol. 19(4), e05R01, 2021. DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2021194-17801
Ramin M., Fant P., Huhtanen P., 2021, The effects of gradual replacement ofbarley with oats on enteric methane emissions, rumen fermentation, milk production,and energy utilization in dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 104(5), pp 5617�5630, 2021. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19644
Kiesse T.S., Corson M.S., Wilfart A., Analysis of milk production and greenhousegas emissions as a function of extreme variations in forage production among Frenchdairy farms, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 307(1), 114537, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114537
Dallago G.M., Kevin W.M., Cue R.I., McClure J.T., Lacroix R., Pellerin D.,Vasseur E., Keeping Dairy Cows for Longer: A Critical Literature Review on DairyCow Longevity in High Milk-Producing Countries, Animals, 11(3), 808, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ani11030808
Palladino R.A., Buckley F., Prendiville R., Murphy J. J., Callan J., Kenny D.A., Acomparison between Holstein-Friesian and Jersey dairy cows and their F1 hybrid onmilk fatty acid composition under grazing conditions, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 93,pp 2176-2184, 2010. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2453
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

