SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

GREEN CITIES AS BIODIVERSITY HUBS

Denis Vasiliev, Lennart Bornmalm, Rodney Stevens

First published: 2024-12-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024v/6.2/s26.37View metrics

Abstract

Global biodiversity decline is dramatic. Urbanization is a global trend that is often driving biodiversity loss. At the same time urban green spaces can maintain high levels of biodiversity. However, for urban Nature-based Solutions to maintain biodiversity they have to be designed and managed with this goal in mind. Furthermore, there are certain risks to biodiversity associated with the urban green infrastructure. These risks merit consideration when urban planning is undertaken. Approaches to green infrastructure planning and design can differ depending on whether it is being integrated into existing cities or into new cities at the planning stage. Social and economic considerations can play an important role in determining whether the Nature-based Solutions projects are sufficiently supported in order to be capable of maintaining biodiversity. The presence of both ecosystem services and disservices can shape public attitude towards the solutions. This is a multi-dimensional question requiring thorough consideration to inform policymakers. Here we conduct a multi-factor analysis and based on it propose recommendations to policymakers and practitioners.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 8
Dimensions ID: pub.1187057678

Publication details

Title
GREEN CITIES AS BIODIVERSITY HUBS
Authors
Denis Vasiliev, Lennart Bornmalm, Rodney Stevens
Proceedings
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2024, Nano, Bio, Green and Space: Technologies for Sustainable Future, Vol 24, Issue 6.2
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2024
Pages
299-306
SWS Citekey
Vasiliev202428299306
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603781
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References17
  1. Filazzola, A., Shrestha, N. and MacIvor, J.S. The contribution of constructed green infrastructure to urban biodiversity: A synthesis and meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 56(9), pp 2131-2143, 2019. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13475

  2. Veerkamp, C.J. et al. A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure, Ecosystem Services, vol. 52, 101367, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101367

  3. Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Green Infrastructure and Health, Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 52, pp. 317 � 328, 2021. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102511

  4. Kumar, P. et al. Urban heat mitigation by green and blue infrastructure: Drivers, effectiveness, and future needs, The Innovation, vol. 5(2), 100588, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100588

  5. Green, D. et al. Green infrastructure: The future of urban flood risk management? WIRES Water, vol.8(6), e1560, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1560

  6. IUCN, Nature-based Solutions, Available from: https://iucn.org/our-work/nature-based-solutions#:~:text=Nature%2Dbased%20Solutions%20address%20societal,nature%20at%20the%20same%20time. [Accessed on the 3rd of November 2024].

  7. Liu, H. et al. Associations of multiple ecosystem services and disservices of urban park ecological infrastructure and the linkages with socioeconomic factors, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 174, pp. 868-879, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.139

  8. Cwik, A. et al. Ecosystem Services and Disservices of Vegetation in Recreational Urban Blue-Green Spaces�Some Recommendations for Greenery Shaping, Forests, vol. 12(8), 1077, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/f12081077

  9. Chmura, D. et al. Novel Ecosystems in the Urban-Industrial Landscape�Interesting Aspects of Environmental Knowledge Requiring Broadening: A Review, Sustainability, vol. 14(17), 10829, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/su141710829

  10. Hudson, J.A., Rock Engineering Systems Theory and Practice. Ellis Horwood, New York, 1992.

  11. Vester, F., The Art of Interconnected Thinking. Ideas and Tools for Tackling Complexity. MCB Verlag GmbH, Germany, 2007.

  12. Scholz, R. W. and Tietje, O., Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. Sage, UK, 2002. DOI: 10.4135/9781412984027

  13. Husqvarna Urban Green Space Insights (HUGSI). Available from: https://www.hugsi.green/ [Accessed on the 17th of November 2024].

  14. Russo, A. et al. Edible green infrastructure: An approach and review of provisioning ecosystem services and disservices in urban environments, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 242, pp 53-66, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.026

  15. Vicarelli, M. et al. On the cost-effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions for reducing disaster risk, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 947, 174524, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174524

  16. Thompson, R. et al. Urban bird diversity: does abundance and richness vary unexpectedly with green space attributes? Journal of Urban Ecology, vol. 8(1), juac017, 2022. DOI: 10.1093/jue/juac017

  17. Daniels, B. et al. A �plan bee� for cities: Pollinator diversity and plant-pollinator interactions in urban green spaces, PLOS ONE, vol. 15(7), e0235492. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235492

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list