SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PAHS IN SOILS USING GC-MS

Alina Kamalova, Polina Galitskaya, Alexander Gordeev, Aliia N. Khamieva, Polina Kuryntseva

First published: 2023-10-01https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023/5.1/s20.11View metrics

Abstract

Soil contamination by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is a widespread concern due to the high potential for human exposure through inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact. In this study, we compared the efficiency of three different methods for PAHs extraction from model samples, including ultrasonic (US), mechanical shaking and purification with commercial QuEChERS kit (Shq), and ultrasonic extraction coupled with QuEChERS (USq) by gas chromatography coupled to a triple quadrupole tandem mass-spectrometry (GC-MS). The results showed that in the ultrasonic extraction with subsequent purification using QuEChERS, the content of PAHs in the sample varied from 86.91 to 2211.60 ng/g. Whereas, in mechanical shaking method, this range was in the range 1.56-761.20 ng/g. In the case of ultrasonic extraction without sorbent purification, only for acenaphthene, fluorene, and benzo(g,h,i)perylene, the values were higher compared to the other two methods: 285.78-27.56 ng/g, 577.48-73.62 ng/g, and 266.35-177.30 ng/g, respectively. The comparison of PAH extraction efficiency showed that the combination of ultrasonic extraction and purification with QuEChERS (USq) was the most efficient method and rapid, obtaining the highest yields for all tested PAHs.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 2
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 4

Publication details

Title
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PAHS IN SOILS USING GC-MS
Authors
Alina Kamalova, Polina Galitskaya, Alexander Gordeev, Aliia N. Khamieva, Polina Kuryntseva
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference- EXPO Proceedings; 23rd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2023, Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation, Vol. 23, Issue 5.1
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2023
Pages
89-96
SWS Citekey
Kamalova2023208996
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-60-6
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References14
  1. Fabbri D, Rombola A G, Torri C � Spokas K A 2013 Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar and biochar amended soil Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.10.003

  2. Buhaug H � Urdal H 2013 An urbanization bomb? Population growth and social disorder in cities Glob. Environ. Chang. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.016

  3. Kim K H, Jahan S A, Kabir E � Brown R J C 2013 A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects Environ. Int. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.07.019

  4. Blankenhorn I, Meijer D � van Delft R J 1992 Inter-laboratory comparison of methods used for analysing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil samples Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. DOI: 10.1007/bf00322157

  5. USEPA 2008 USEPA, Office of Solid Waste (2008) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Encycl. Earth Sci. Ser. Accessed 1

  6. Keith L H 2015 The Source of U.S. EPA�s Sixteen PAH Priority Pollutants Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 35 147�60 DOI: 10.1080/10406638.2014.892886

  7. Slowik-Borowiec M, Szpyrka E, Ksiazek-Trela P � Podbielska M 2022 Simultaneous Determination of Multi-Class Pesticide Residues and PAHs in Plant Material and Soil Samples Using the Optimized QuEChERS Method and Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis Molecules DOI: 10.3390/molecules27072140

  8. Song Y F, Jing X, Fleischmann S � Wilke B M 2002 Comparative study of extraction methods for the determination of PAHs from contaminated soils and sediments Chemosphere DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00180-7

  9. Banjoo D R � Nelson P K 2005 Improved ultrasonic extraction procedure for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments J. Chromatogr. A DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.01.033

  10. Oluseyi T, Olayinka K, Alo B � Smith R M 2011 Comparison of extraction and clean-up techniques for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil samples African J. Environ. Sci. Technol.

  11. Berset J D, Ejem M, Holzer R � Lischer P 1999 Comparison of different drying, extraction and detection techniques for the determination of priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in background contaminated soil samples Anal. Chim. Acta DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(98)00817-4

  12. Lian W, Ren F, Tang L � Dong D 2016 Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette samples using gel permeation chromatography clean-up by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Microchem. J. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.06.021

  13. Auer W � Malissa H 1990 Determination of trace amounts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil Anal. Chim. Acta DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)83949-5

  14. Martens D, Maguhn J, Spitzauer P � Kettrup A 1997 Occurrence and distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in an agricultural ecosystem Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. DOI: 10.1007/s002160050630

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list