SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

GENDER-DIFFERENCE PERCEPTION OF URAN PUBLIC SPACES

Michal Kraus

First published: 2021-12-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2021v/6.2/s27.23View metrics

Abstract

In accordance with the principles of sustainable development, people have the right to live in a healthy, comfortable, and pleasant environment that is adapted to their needs. Not only urban planners, urban engineers, or developers, but the whole society are starting to deal with the issue of public space in cities more intensively. However, most of the discussions mainly concern the height and density of buildings within the city and do less about the resulting changes in urban space, which will affect the entire city and its parts. Spatial planning aims is to create such public spaces that are attractive and usable for all social groups, regardless of gender, age, social affiliation, culture, or religion, but also restrictions on mobility. Gender differences in perception are very often a neglected factor in the creation and shaping of public space, especially in small towns. In general, women are more sensitive to the quality of urban space. From previous surveys, it can be determined that women use public spaces more often than men, mainly due to the predominance of walking to work, accompanying children to school or extracurricular activities, to shopping, etc. The criteria for choosing public spaces for women range from the quality of the surface material of paved surfaces (allowing movement even in high heels) to the feeling of security in each place. The element of safety and the perceived personal feeling of security throughout the day is very important.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
GENDER-DIFFERENCE PERCEPTION OF URAN PUBLIC SPACES
Authors
Michal Kraus
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 21st SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2021, Nano, Bio, Green and Space: Technologies for Sustainable Future
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2021
Pages
149-154
SWS Citekey
Kraus202127207212
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-36-1
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References11
  1. Nigel T., Urban Planning Theory since 1945, United States, 1998, ISBN 978-0-7619-6093-5.

  2. European Union, UN-Habitat, World Bank, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Applying the degree of urbanisation — A methodological manual to define cities, towns and rural areas for international comparisons: 2021 edition, Luxembourg, 2021.

  3. Guo X., Yang Y., Cheng Z., Wu Q., Li Ch. Lo T., Chen F., Spatial social interaction: An explanatory framework of urban space vitality and its preliminary verification, Cities, 103486, in press, corrected proof.

  4. Schraven D., Joss S., Jong de M., Past, present, future: Engagement with sustainable urban development through 35 city labels in the scientific literature 1990–2019, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 292, 125924, 2021.

  5. Zhang X., Hes D., Wu Y., Hafkamp W., Lu W., Bayulken B., Schnitzer H., Li F., Catalyzing sustainable urban transformations towards smarter, healthier cities through urban ecological infrastructure, regenerative development, eco towns and regional prosperity, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 122, pp. 2-4, 2016.

  6. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

  7. Li X., Liu L., Zhang Z., Zhang W., Liu D., Feng Y., Gender Disparity in Perceived Urban Green Space and Subjective Health and Well-Being in China: Implications for Sustainable Urban Greening, Sustainability, 12, 10538, 2020.

  8. Kern K., Feminist City, Claiming Space in a Man-made World, Verso, 2020.

  9. Zavadskas E.K., Bausys R., Mazonaviciute I., Safety evaluation methodology of urban public parks by multi-criteria decision making, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 189, pp 372-381, 2019.

  10. Perkins Ch., International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Oxford: Elsevier, pp 126-132, 2009.

  11. Kankovsky A., Kraus M., Perception of Space and Mental Maps: The Case Study of City Chotebor (Czechia), IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 6th World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium (WMAUS 2021), in publishing process.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database