Scholarly record
MINING METHOD SELECTION BY TOPSIS APPROACH (CASE STUDY OF REZA ABAD BALL CLAY \& BAUXITE MINE)
Abstract
One of the most critical and complicated steps in mine design is to select an suitable mining method based upon geological, geotechnical, geographical and economical parameters. Since there are many factors involved for the selection of mining method, which is decision-making process, the problem is very difficult to solve. In this paper, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with 18 criteria is used to develop a suitable mining method for the Reza Abad ballclay \& bauxite ore deposit in Damqan. Three alternatives (Open pit, Shrinkage stoping and cut and fill stoping) are evaluated. The studies show that the suitable mining method appropriate mining technique for this deposit with regard to the present situation is cut and fill method.
Publication details
References2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.133 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. Wang,Y.M, Taha M.S. 2006, Elhag, Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.029 0 0 0 0 0 level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment, Expert Systems with 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.043 0 0 0 0 Applications 31 (2006) 309-319. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.011 0 0 0 2. Ataei, M, 2005, mining method selection by Technique for Order 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.031 0 0 Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution approach, 24 geo science congress Iran. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.039 0 3. Dezyani, H., 2006, "Mining Method Selection in Ball Clay and Bauxite mine 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.013 of Reza Abad", M.S. thesis, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, 4) Tehran, Iran, pp. 75-100. 0.045 0.052 0.043 0.036 0.022 0.021 0.007 0.039 0.02 0.056 0.189 0.068 0.02 0.039 0.006 0.01 0.026 0.004 V 0.08 0.04 0.019 0.018 0.022 0.021 0.002 0.019 0.002 0.019 0.021 0.112 0.006 0.017 0.003 0.017 0.013 0.007 objec ti . v e M l . a A r . g e A -s b c o a - l S e in n n o a n , lin A e .H ar . p A r m og e r r a , m m in g , E pr x o t b en le s m io s n , s A o p f p li T ed O P M S a I t S h em fo a r t ic m s u a l n ti d - 0.007 0.011 0.005 0.004 0.05 0.032 0.009 0.005 0.015 0.066 0.041 0.023 0.018 0.006 0.009 0.024 0.016 0.01 Computation 162 (2005) 243-256. 5) A0.08 0.0520.0430.036 0.05 0.0320.0090.039 0.02 0.066 0.189 0.1120.02 0.0390.009 0.024 0.0260.01 5. C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon,1981, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods A0.007 0.011 0.005 0.004 0.022 0.021 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.019 0.021 0.023 0.006 0.006 0.003 0.017 0.013 0.004 and Applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
6. Chen,C.T, 2000, Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making Final result of mining method selection of Reza Abad ball clay & bauxite ore under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114 (2000) 1-9. deposit by TOPSIS technique shown in table 3. 7. Y.J. Lai, T.Y. Liu, C.L. Hwang,1994, TOPSIS for MODM, European Journal of Operational Research 76 (3) (1994) 486-500.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.