SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

CASE STUDY OF GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL DATA CORROBORATION IN NORTH-WEST PART OF ROMANIA

Natalia-Silvia Asimopolos, Larentiu Asimopolos

First published: 2020-09-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/1.1/s01.005View metrics

Abstract

The study begins with a synthetic presentation of geological and geophysical data at this time. The geological data come from the detailed geological mapping superimposed over the previously elaborated geological maps (at scales 1: 200000 and 1: 50000). The data on the deep structure come from the magnetotelluric and seismic sections interpreted. Of course, the documentation obtained from previous referenced publications and the specialized sites brought an extra knowledge. We performed a multiparametric correlative analysis of various geophysical parameters (Bouguer anomaly, Free Air anomaly, magnetic anomalies, electrical resistivity anomalies, etc.) as well as geodetic surfaces (geoid, quasigeoid, reference ellipsoid and topographic surface). Algorithms and programs used for filtering, smoothing and interpolating data were represented by mobile average with various rectangular windows, calculation of analytical expressions of trend polynomial surfaces, calculation of correlation coefficients with mobile windows and spectral analysis. From a methodological point of view, starting from the programs developed for the trend surfaces with different degrees, they allowed us to determine by an analytical expression a geophysical parameter (dependent variable) according to two independent variables (latitude and longitude). The residual values (those relevant for the surface structures) represent the difference between the measured real values and the calculated values of the trend surfaces. We also used the successive filtering of geophysical parameters, starting with the elimination of the planar trend, then the second-degree surfaces and finally the highest degree trend surface. The results obtained in this way, for geophysical parameters, we were able to correlate them with the surface geological elements as well as with the depth ones and the tectonic elements.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 1

Publication details

Title
CASE STUDY OF GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL DATA CORROBORATION IN NORTH-WEST PART OF ROMANIA
Authors
Natalia-Silvia Asimopolos, Larentiu Asimopolos
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 20th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2020, Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration And Mining
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2020
Pages
43-50
SWS Citekey
Asimopolos202014350
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-04-0
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References12
  1. Asimopolos N.S., Asimopolos L. – 2018 - Highlighting the deep tectonic elements of the eastern carpathians by analyzing the morphology of geoid, Conference Proceedings, Vol.18, Geology, Issue Issue 2.2, pp. 821-828

  2. Asimopolos L., Asimopolos N.S., Cociuba I. – 2019 - Systematization and processing of geological and geophysical data in the part of North-West of Transylvanian Basin, Conference proceedings Volume 19, Science and technologies in geology, exploration and mining, Issue 1.1, Geology, pp 561-568, ISBN 978-619-7408-76-8, ISSN 1314-2704, DOI: 10.539/sgem2019/1.1

  3. Barthelmes F. & Kohler W. - 2016. Journal of Geodesy. The Geodesists Handbook, International Association of Geodesy. 90(10): 907-1205.

  4. Ioane D., Ion D. 2005-A 3D crustal gravity modelling of the Romanian territory: Journal of Balkan Geophysical Society, Vol.8, No 4, November 2005, p.189-198

  5. Martinec, Z., P. Vaníček, A. Mainville, M. Veronneau, 1996, The evaluation of topographical effects in precise geoid computation from densely sampled heights, Journal of Geodesy, 70, , 746-754.

  6. Polonic, G., 1998 - The structure and morphology of the crystalline basement in Romania. CERGOP ―South Carpathians‖ monograph, vol. 7 (37), pp. 127–131. Warszawa.

  7. Rădulescu Fl., 1988. Seismic models of the crustal structure in Romania, Rev.Roum.Geol.Geophys.Geogr.Ser.Geophys., 32, 13–17

  8. Sjöberg, L.E., 1995, On the cvasigeoid to geoid separation, Manuscripta geodaetica,Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 182-192

  9. Tenzer R., Chen W., and Jin S., 2015, Effect of Upper Mantle Density Structure on Moho Geometry, Pure Appl. Geophys. 172 ,1563–1583

  10. Unwin D. 1978. An introduction to trend surface analysis – CAT MOG 5. (Concept and Techniques in Modern Geography, London, 1-40 pag.)

  11. http://bgi.obs-mip.fr

  12. www.mathworks.com

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list