SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

TOOLS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING IN POLAND - HOW EFFECTIVE THEY ARE AND COULD BECOME

Jolanta Harasymiuk, Elżbieta Szafranko, Marlena Jurczak

First published: 2024-12-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024v/6.2/s25.25View metrics

Abstract

The study attempts to examine the current and potential effectiveness of selected tools used in environmental planning of construction projects in Poland. Environmental planning is a complicated and demanding process, and as such it should be supported by the use of environmental management applications. At the early investment planning stage, it is necessary to verify whether a construction project to be developed, in addition to a building permit, does not require a decision on environmental conditions. This decision precedes the issuance of building permits for projects implemented as undertakings with a significant impact on the environment. It should provide the authorities responsible for the procedures and the public with the information on what environmental effects the construction project may have on a local scale. The environmental impact assessments (EIA) database is an IT system used to collect, process and share information on EIA proceedings on a national scale. One of the key functionalities of this system should be to streamline the work of bodies participating in EIAs and to accelerate investment processes. The study focuses on a multidimensional analysis of the effectiveness of environmental management tools from the point of view of main stakeholders in construction projects, and proposes appropriate improvements.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2
Dimensions ID: pub.1187057666

Publication details

Title
TOOLS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING IN POLAND - HOW EFFECTIVE THEY ARE AND COULD BECOME
Authors
Jolanta Harasymiuk, Elżbieta Szafranko, Marlena Jurczak
Proceedings
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2024, Nano, Bio, Green and Space: Technologies for Sustainable Future, Vol 24, Issue 6.2
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2024
Pages
197-206
SWS Citekey
Harasymiuk202427197206
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603781
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References14
  1. Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., & Setunge, S. (2019). Estimation of environmental emissions and impacts of building construction � A decision making tool for contractors. Journal of building engineering, 21, 173-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.023

  2. Akanni, P. O., Oke, A. E., & Akpomiemie, O. A. (2015). Impact of environmental factors on building project performance in Delta State, Nigeria. HBRC journal, 11(1), 91-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.02.010

  3. Haapio, A., Viitaniemi, P. (2008). A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28, 7, pp. 469-482. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002

  4. Guggemos, A. A., & Horvath, A. (2006). Decision-support tool for assessing the environmental effects of constructing commercial buildings. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 12(4), 187-195. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(2006)12:4(187)

  5. Poch, M., Comas, J., Rodriguez-Roda, I., Sanchez-Marre, M., & Cortes, U. (2004). Designing and building real environmental decision support systems. Environmental modelling & software, 19(9), pp. 857-873. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.03.007

  6. Forsberg, A., Malmborg, F. (2004). Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment, Building and Environment, 39, pp. 223 � 228. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.004

  7. Dietz, T. (2003). What is a Good Decision? Criteria for Environmental Decision Making. Human Ecology Review, 10 (1), pp. 33�39.

  8. Harasymiuk, J.; Szafranko, E. (2022). Method of Construction Projects� Classification for Habitat Assessment in Poland and the Problem of Choosing Materials Solutions, Sustainability, 14, 4277. DOI: 10.3390/su14074277

  9. Strulak-Wojcikiewicz, R., Lemke, J. (2019). Concept of a Simulation Model for Assessing the Sustainable Development of Urban Transport, Transportation Research Procedia, 39, pp. 502�513 DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.052

  10. Harasymiuk, J., Szafranko, E., Tyburski, J. (2019). Methods of habitat reports� evaluation, Open Engineering, 9,1, pp. 26-33. DOI: 10.1515/eng-2019-0001

  11. Galas, S., Bohatkiewicz, J. (2014). The application of checklists in environmental studies in the field of road construction, Building and Architecture, 13(1), pp. 295-304. DOI: 10.35784/bud-arch.1947

  12. Harasymiuk, J., Fadrowski, S. (2013). Selected problems in issuing environmental decisions based on experiences of the province Warmia and Mazury in 2009�2011, Scientific Review � Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 61, pp. 348�360.

  13. Nowak, M. (2012). Decisions Regarding Environmental Conditions as a Management Tool for a Balanced Development at the Local Scale in Poland, Regional and Local Studies, 4(50), pp. 111-125.

  14. Collective work edited by Wilzak, T. Procedural issues in environmental impact assessments. General Directorate of Environmental Protection, Warsaw, 2013.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list