SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

COMPARISON OF SOIL LOSS DUE TO WATER EROSION BEFORE AND AFTER A CHANGE IN AGRONOMIC PRACTICES

David Dezericky, David Dezericky, Sára Daxnerová, Zlatica Muchová

First published: 2024-12-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024v/3.2/s12.26View metrics

Abstract

Between September 13th and 16th, 2024, heavy rainfall led to widespread flooding across the municipalities in the Senica district, as well as significant soil erosion on intensively farmed arable land. According to data from the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMU), the Senica district received a total of 230 millimeters of precipitation during this period. In the village of Smolinske, located in the lowlands of Zahorie in western Slovakia, experienced substantial flooding of agricultural areas, leading to considerable surface and gully erosion across many agricultural parcels. In this study, we present the effects of this rainfall on soil block 5002/1 Sastin (LPIS designation), with a total area of 34.86 ha. In the area, we conducted a detailed unmanned aircraft system (UAS) flight from a height of 70 m, producing an orthophotomosaic that depicted the erosion-damaged areas. These areas were vectorized and used to verify the results of the erosion rate calculation. The calculation of water erosion was performed using the Universal Soil Loss Equation methodology. The K and R factors were determined based on tabular data derived from the national soil rating system (BPEJ) and on the data of the rainfall measuring stations. The LS factor was derived from airborne laser scanning data based on DMR5.0 (1 m resolution). The support practice - P and cover management - C factors were determined through field reconnaissance conducted during the flooding event. The estimated soil loss was approximately 2.5 t.ha-1.yr-1. The proposed change to the status was implemented by altering the current land management. We proposed the measure of strip crop rotation, which significantly affects the C and P factors. The erosion loss calculation was again carried out. The two outputs were compared, and the differences were balanced. The results suggest that even a "simple" change in agrotechnical measures can mitigate the effects of extreme events.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2
Dimensions ID: pub.1186962894

Publication details

Title
COMPARISON OF SOIL LOSS DUE TO WATER EROSION BEFORE AND AFTER A CHANGE IN AGRONOMIC PRACTICES
Authors
David Dezericky, David Dezericky, Sára Daxnerová, Zlatica Muchová
Proceedings
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2024, Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems, Vol 24, Issue 3.2
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2024
Pages
195-202
SWS Citekey
Dezericky202414195202
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603767
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References16
  1. Anders I., Stagl J., Auer I., Pavlik D., Climate Change in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Rannow S., Neubert M. (eds) Managing Protected Areas in Central and Eastern Europe Under Climate Change. Advances in Global Change Research, Springer, Dordrech, New York, London vol. 58, pp 17-30, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7960-0_2

  2. Albrecht J., Hartmann T., Land for flood risk management - Instruments and strategies of land management for polders and dike relocations in Germany, Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 118, pp 36-44, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.008

  3. McIvor I., Youjun H., Daoping L., Eyles G., Pu Z., Agroforestry: Conservation Trees and Erosion Prevention, Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, 2014, pp 208-221. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00247-3

  4. Lal R., Soil erosion and the global carbon budget, Environment International, vol. 29, no. 4, 2003, pp. 437-450, ISSN 0160-4120, DOI: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00192-7.

  5. Kothyari, U. C., Soil erosion and sediment yield modeling, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 14, pp 84�103, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2008.10514895

  6. Quinton J.N., Catt J.A, Enrichment of heavy metals in sediment resulting from soil erosion on agricultural fields, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 41, pp 3495-3500, 2007. DOI: 10.1021/es062147h

  7. Gazzola P., Belcakova I., Pauditsova E., Case studies. Landscape impact assessment in planning processes, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, vol. 163, pp 139-189, 2019. DOI: 10.1515/9783110601558-007

  8. Meinen B.U., Robinson D.T., Agricultural erosion modelling: Evaluating USLE and WEPP field-scale erosion estimates using UAV time-series data, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 137, pp 104962, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104962

  9. d'Oleire-Oltmanns S., Marzolff I., Peter K.D., Ries J.B., Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Monitoring Soil Erosion in Morocco, Remote Sensing, vol. 4, pp 3390-3416, 2012. DOI: 10.3390/rs4113390

  10. Lal R., Soil Erosion by Wind and Water: Problems and Prospects, Soil Erosion Research Methods, pp 1-10, 2017. DOI: 10.1201/9780203739358-1

  11. Wischmeier W.H., Smith D., Predicting rainfall erosion losses, Agricultural Handbook No. 537, USDA, Washington D.C., 1978.

  12. Onderka M., Pecho J., Update of the erosive rain factor in Slovakia using data from the period 1961�2009, Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, vol. 49, no. 3, 2019, pp. 355�371. DOI: 10.2478/congeo-2019-0018

  13. Ilavska B., Jambor P., Lazur R., Identification of threats to soil quality from water and wind erosion and proposals for measures, VUPOP, Bratislava, 2005, 60 pp. (in Slovak).

  14. McCool D.K., Foster G.R., Mutchler C.K., Meyer L.D., Revised slope length factor for the Universal Soil Loss Equation, Transactions of the ASAE, vol. 32, no. 5, 1989, pp. 1571-1576, DOI: 10.13031/2013.31192.

  15. Janus J., Ertunc E., Muchova Z., Tomic H., Impact of selected land fragmentation parameters and spatial rural settlement patterns on the competitiveness of agriculture: Examples of selected European and Asian countries, Habitat International, vol. 140, 2023, Art. No. 102911, ISSN 0197-3975. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102911

  16. Dumbrovsky, D., Sarapatka B., Bednar M., Sobotkova V., Prazan J., Mrnustik Konecna M., Vrstevnicove obdelavani a pasove stridani plodin. Certifikovana metodika, VUT v Brne, 2021. https://protieroznipasy.vumop.cz/data/Vrstevnicov%C3%-A9%20obd%C4%9Bl%C3%A1v%C3%A1n%C3%AD%20a%20p%C3%A1sov%C3%A9%20st%C5%99%C3%ADdan%C3%AD%20plodin.pdf

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list