SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

ASSESSING THE INSTABILITY RISKS IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY AND THE MITIGATING ROLE OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

Myrzabike Zhumabayeva, Sezim Yertayeva, Kundyz Madykhanova

First published: 2025-08-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2025/5.1/s20.038View metrics

Abstract

The global economy is confronted with a myriad of risks, encompassing economic instability, climate change, social challenges, and technological transformations. These risks pose significant threats to companies, their financial health, and long-term sustainability. In the era of globalization and heightened awareness of environmental and social issues, sustainable development has emerged as a critical component of business operations worldwide. To address these challenges, organizations are increasingly adopting various risk management strategies, including sustainability reporting. This practice entails the disclosure of information pertaining to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects. In Kazakhstan, as in other nations, there is a growing imperative for companies to disclose their sustainability-related activities. However, the approaches to reporting in this domain remain underdeveloped, underscoring the necessity to examine current practices and formulate corporate standards. This article explores the issue of sustainability reporting by Kazakhstani companies within the framework of sustainable development, which encompasses economic, environmental, and social dimensions. The authors scrutinize current reporting practices, their alignment with international standards, and propose recommendations for enhancing transparency and bolstering business accountability to society and the environment. To investigate the risks of instability in the global economy and the role of sustainability reporting in mitigating them, a variety of methods can be employed. These methods facilitate a deeper understanding of the issue and the identification of key aspects. They include qualitative methods (such as case studies, interviews with experts and industry participants, and document analysis), comparative analysis, and the examination of political and institutional factors (including political economy analysis and regulatory environment analysis). The integration of these methods provides a comprehensive understanding of the risks of instability in the global economy and the role of sustainability reporting in managing them, offering both qualitative and quantitative data for in-depth analysis and the formulation of recommendations for businesses and governmental bodies.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 4
Dimensions ID: pub.1195348590

Publication details

Title
ASSESSING THE INSTABILITY RISKS IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY AND THE MITIGATING ROLE OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING
Authors
Myrzabike Zhumabayeva, Sezim Yertayeva, Kundyz Madykhanova
Proceedings
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM2025, Ecology, Environmental Economics, Education, and Legislation, Vol25, Issue 5.1.
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2025
Pages
305-312
SWS Citekey
Zhumabayeva202520305312
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603859
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References7
  1. Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalization and Its Discontents. W.W. Norton & Company.

  2. Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400831722

  3. Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511817434

  4. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2018). The Nordic Model of Corporate Governance. Oxford University Press.

  5. Kotsantonis, S., Pinney, C., & Serafeim, G. (2016). ESG Integration in Investment Management: Myths and Realities. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 10-27. DOI: 10.1111/jacf.12169

  6. Bremmer, I. (2012). Every Nation for Itself: Winners and Losers in a G-Zero World. Penguin Press. [.]Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 [8]European Commission. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU on Disclosure of Non-Financial and Diversity Information. European Union. [9]GRI Standards (Global Reporting Initiative), available on the official GRI website.

  7. "National Strategy for Sustainable Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2010-2024", Ministry of Ecology, Geology and Natural Resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list