Scholarly record
MUNICIPAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOVERNANCE INDICATOR SYSTEM INNOVATION: INTRODUCTION AND ASSESSMENT
Abstract
Quantitative supervision of the implementation of planning documents is one of the fundamental elements of good governance and is vital for ensuring sustainable development perspective. The sustainability of a territory may be specifically defined in developmental planning documents as a long-term goal or indirectly emanate from the territorial vision and set of defined measurable objectives. The most effective way to supervise progress towards planned objectives is with the help of the relevant indicator system (IS). In the Latvia, such IS having been first introduced as a municipal governance instrument in Saulkrasti Municipality in 2013. Currently, the ISпїЅs first measurement cycle of their 64 indicators has concluded and evaluated by the University of Latvia within SUSTINNO project framework. The main results are twofold: 1) an assessment of the municipality's sustainability based on four main sustainable development dimensions has been done with recommendations for the decision-makers and a special innovative report (Sustainability Governance Outlook) for the needs of the general public, and 2) an assessment of the functioning of the IS itself and proposals for the improvement of the system were done too. The sustainability report is compiled according to the dimension principles, with the separate attachment of an assessment regarding the municipalityпїЅs long-term developmental objectives. On a five-point scale, the sustainability of Saulkrasti Municipality is evaluated as being 3.3 in relation to the natural environment, 2.8 in regard to the social environment, and 2.7 in terms of the economic and governance environments. The indicators themselves were evaluated according to a seven criteria system. Five criteria applied to data obtainability and quality, while the remaining two were applicable to the compatibility of an indicator to its objective. Individual indicators that were deemed to be largely ineffective or incalculable, because of a lack of adequate data, were replaced with others. The system as a whole was improved by slightly restructuring it, identifying primary indicators for dimensions and individual sectors, and by augmenting the list of strategic indicators. Regardless of its individual shortcomings, the specific municipal IS functions successfully, but the problem is the lack of resources allocated by the municipality to the maintenance of the IS. Moreover, the system is not satisfactorily integrated with others, including higher level developmental planning documents. This is being taken into account in the development of municipal sustainability monitoring systems for other municipalities and in provisional forming of the national network of sustainable development governance evaluation IS.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References14
Sustainable development strategy for 25 years at Saulkrasti Municipality. KBLC Ltd., 2013., 28 p. (in latvian).
Āboliņa K. (2005) Criteria for the development of indicators for the balanced development of Latvian cities. Summary of the PhD thesis. Faculty of Geography and Earth sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, 2005., 34 p.
Labuschagnea C., Brenta A.C., Ron P.G., Van Ercka, P.G. Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 13 (2005) 373–385. The Wuppertal sustainable development indicator framework
Lundin U. Indicators for measuring the sustainability of urban water systems – a life cycle approach. Ph.D. Thesis (2003). Department of Environmental Systems Analysis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Ramos T.B. Development of regional sustainability indicators and the role of academia in this process: The Portuguese practice. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (2009) 1101–1115
Rametsteiner E., Pulzl H., Alkan-Olsson J., Frederiksen P. Sustainability indicator development– Science or political negotiation? Ecological Indicators 11 (2011) 61–70
Valtenbergs V., González A., Piziks R. Selecting indicators for sustainable development of small towns: the case of Valmiera municipality. Procedia Computer Science 26 (2013) 21 – 32
Warhurst, A. Sustainability Indicators and Sustainability Performance Management. Report to the Project: Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development. IIED, Warwick, England (2002), http://www.iied.org/mmsd/mmsd pdfs/sustainability indicators.pdf.
Lancker E., Nijkamp P. A policy scenario analysis of sustainable agricultural development options: a case study for Nepal. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18 (2000), 111–124.
Hák T., Janoušková V., Moldan B. Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators 60 (2016) 565–573
Sara Moreno Pires Teresa Fidelis Local sustainability indicators in Portugal: assessing implementation and use in governance contexts. Journal of Cleaner Production 86 (2015) 289-300
Marti X., Lescrauvaet A-K., Borg M., Valls M. (ed.). Indicators Guidelines: To adopt an indicators-based approach to evaluate coastal sustainable development. DEDUCE Consortium, Interreg IIIc, Barcelona, 2007. 98p.
Kauliņš J., Ernšteins R., Kudreņickis I. Sustainable development indicators for integrated coastal management: definition area and spatial properties. Ecology and the Environment, 2011, vol.144, p.299-311.
Kauliņš J. Indicators for sustainable development governance. Summary of the PhD thesis. Faculty of Geography and Earth sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia. 2015, 36 p.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
