SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

A MODEL FOR MAPPING PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY TO LANDSLIDES

Adrian Grozavu, Ionel Muntele, Alexandru Banica, Lucian Rosu, Iulian Catalin Stanga

First published: 2016-06-28https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2016/b23/s11.002View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
A MODEL FOR MAPPING PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY TO LANDSLIDES
Authors
Adrian Grozavu, Ionel Muntele, Alexandru Banica, Lucian Rosu, Iulian Catalin Stanga
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016, Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2016
Pages
11-18
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-60-5
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References18
  1. Bai S.B., Wang J., Lü G.N., Zhou P.G., Hou S.S. , Xu S.N., GISbased logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China, Geomorphology, vol. 115, pp. 23-31, 2010.

  2. Bell R., Glade T., Quantitative risk analysis for landslides – Examples from Bíldudalur, NW-Iceland, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 4, pp 117-131, 2004;

  3. Fell R., Corominas J., Bonnard C., Cascini L., Leroi E., Savage W.Z., Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning, Engineering Geology, vol. 102 , pp 85-98, 2008;

  4. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., Charlton M., Quantitative Geography, Sage, 270 p, 2000.

  5. Fuchs S., Birkmann J., Glade T., Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges, Nat Hazards , vol. 64, pp 1969-1975, 2012.

  6. Hollenstein K., Reconsidering the risk assessment concept: Standardizing the impact description as a building block for vulnerability assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 5, pp 301-307, 2005;

  7. Hufschmidt G., A comparative analysis of several vulnerability concepts, Nat. Hazards, vol. 58, pp 621-643, 2011;

  8. Kappes M.S., Papathoma-Köhle M., Keiler M., Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator –based methodology, Applied Geography, vol. 32 , pp 577-590, 2012.

  9. Mărgărint M.C., Juravle D.T., Grozavu A., Patriche C.V., Pohrib M., Stângă I.C., Large landslide risk assessment in hilly areas. A case study of Huşi town region (north - east of Romania), Italian Journal of Engineering Geology and Environment - Book Series, Italy, vol. 13/issue 1, pp 275-286, 2013;

  10. Bai S.B., Wang J., Lü G.N., Zhou P.G., Hou S.S. , Xu S.N., GISbased logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China, Geomorphology, vol. 115, pp. 23-31, 2010.

  11. Bell R., Glade T., Quantitative risk analysis for landslides – Examples from Bíldudalur, NW-Iceland, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 4, pp 117-131, 2004;

  12. Fell R., Corominas J., Bonnard C., Cascini L., Leroi E., Savage W.Z., Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning, Engineering Geology, vol. 102 , pp 85-98, 2008;

  13. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., Charlton M., Quantitative Geography, Sage, 270 p, 2000.

  14. Fuchs S., Birkmann J., Glade T., Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges, Nat Hazards , vol. 64, pp 1969-1975, 2012.

  15. Hollenstein K., Reconsidering the risk assessment concept: Standardizing the impact description as a building block for vulnerability assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 5, pp 301-307, 2005;

  16. Hufschmidt G., A comparative analysis of several vulnerability concepts, Nat. Hazards, vol. 58, pp 621-643, 2011;

  17. Kappes M.S., Papathoma-Köhle M., Keiler M., Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator –based methodology, Applied Geography, vol. 32 , pp 577-590, 2012.

  18. Mărgărint M.C., Juravle D.T., Grozavu A., Patriche C.V., Pohrib M., Stângă I.C., Large landslide risk assessment in hilly areas. A case study of Huşi town region (north - east of Romania), Italian Journal of Engineering Geology and Environment - Book Series, Italy, vol. 13/issue 1, pp 275-286, 2013;

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 1

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org