Scholarly record
EFFICIENCY OF GREEN ROOFS WITH DIFFERENT DEPTH AND WAYS TO REFLECT IT IN THE LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS
Abstract
In Bulgaria, every municipality develops an Ordinance for the construction and protection of the green system, which regulates the public relations associated with planning, construction, sustainable maintenance, conservation, and development of the green system, regardless of the ownership. The local authorities are free to customize the ordinance as long as the goals and framework of the Spatial Development Act [1] are maintained. Only 82 of the 265 municipalities have such Ordinances, including some stipulations regarding green roofs. Most of them set high requirements which do not reflect the actual efficiency of the green roofs and impede their construction in the country. Green roofs with depths under 30 cm are considered green area only in one municipality, with a coefficient 0.3. Water retention is one of the main effects of green roofs in an urban environment. It can be used as a base for the comparison of the effect of roofs with different depths and for the calculation of multiplication coefficients for the regional legislative documents, which will help compensate the smaller efficiency of a certain depth with a bigger area. The aim of this article is to analyze the available data for the efficiency of the green roofs in regards to water retention and propose a reasonable way to include green roofs with smaller depths in the green area of the urban territories. The comparative efficiency of green roofs with different depths at equal rainfall conditions is calculated based on the analysis of the current legislative requirements regarding green roofs and literature data regarding the water retention capacity of green roofs. The analysis confirmed the applicability of the currently stipulated in the legislation coefficients for green roofs with a depth between 30 cm and 60 cm and served as a base for calculation of multiplication coefficients allowing green roofs with depth below 30 cm to be included in the green area.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References10
Buccola N., Spolek G., A Pilot-Scale Evaluation of Greenroof Runoff Retention, Detention, and Quality. Water Air Soil Pollution, vol. 216, pp. 83-92, 2011.
Feitosa C.R., Wilkinson S., Modelling green roof stormwater response for different soil depths. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 153, pp. 170–179, 2016.
Landscape Development and Landscaping Research Society (FLL), Green roof guidelines – guildelnes for planning, construction and maintainance of green roofs. 6th edition, 2018.
Li Y., Babcock Jr. R.W., Green roof hydrologic performance and modeling: a review. Water Science & Technology, issue 69/4, pp. 727-738, 2014.
Metselaar, K., Water retention and evapotranspiration of green roofs and possible natural vegetation types. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 64 (RECYCL2519), pp. 49-55, 2012.
Morgan, S., Celik S., Retzlaff B., Green Roof Storm-Water Runoff Quantity and Quality Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 139 (4), pp. 471 – 478, 2013.
Spatial Development Act. 2001. In force from 31.03.2001, last amendment SG No 21, 13.03.2020.
Stovin, V., The potential of Green roofs to manage Urban Stormwater. Water Environmental Journal, vol. 24, pp. 192–199, 2010.
Stovin, V., Po? S., Berretta C., A modelling study of long term green roof retention performance. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 131, 2013.
Rainfall data from https://www.stringmeteo.com.
Citing literature
Number of times cited according to Crossref: 1
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

