Scholarly record
WHERE PUBLICATIONS AND RANKINGS MEET: A CASE OF PERSONALIZED IT-SERVICE AT ITMO UNIVERSITY
Abstract
Academic rankings can be referred to as a tool of external evaluation of university performance, and a crucial role that the rankings play now in government decisions to fund university research around the world is undoubtful, despite all the ambiguity and skewness of rankings methodologies. Having said that the publication productivity and citation impact are important criteria of rankings evaluation, not only university management needs to be sure that the rankings trajectory is well applied, or incorporated into publication strategy. The researchers themselves should have easy and instant access to customized service helping them at least better understand the rankings dimension of their publication activities. This article presents hands-on experience of ITMO University in designing and applying special algorithmic model aimed to monitor and evaluate the personal contribution of university authors - through their publications indexed by Scopus - to QS and THE subject areas. The sources - such as an author's profile, publications indexed by Scopus database, rankings subject, year of rankings release as well as the correspondence matrix of ASJC codes and rankings subject areas - form the basis of a software module which allows an author to see the distribution of his/her publications into corresponding rankings subjects. Likewise, the module enables the author to choose publication sources which will allow to enhance the personal and institutional performance in the given subject rankings.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References10
Yudkevich, M., Altbach, P. G., Rumbley, L. E. Global university rankings: The “Olympic games” of higher education? Prospects, 2015, 45(4), pp 411-419.
Hazelkorn, E., Loukkola, T., Zhang, T. Rankings in Institutional Strategies and Processes: Impact or Illusion? EUA Publications, 2014, 60 p.
West J., Mattis G., Philippou G. Demystifying the Rankings: A Guide for Universities. QS White Paper, 2019, p. 14.
QS Rankings by Subject methodology: http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/subject-tables/
Downing, K., Ganotice, F. World university rankings and the future of Higher education. A volume in the Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership (AEMAL) book series, 2016, 534 p.
Times Higher Education Rankings by Subject methodology: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings-subject-ranking-2020-computer-science-methodology
Hazelkorn, E., Gibson, A. Global science, national research, and the question of university rankings. Palgrave Communications, 2017, vol. 3, issue 1, art. 11.
Navarro, G. A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Computing Surveys, 2001, vol. 33, issue 1, pp 31–88.
Kotsemir, M. Dynamics of Russian and world science through the prism of international publications. Foresight Russia, 2012, vol. 6, issue 1, 2012, pp 38-59.
Markina, G., Shlei, M., Kuznetsova, O., Mazur, Ya., Markina, T. & Leontieva V. Assessment of the potential of the scientific activity of the performers' collective when submitting applications for participation in competitive selection. Internet Journal of Science, 2017, vol. 9, issue 1, 19 p.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

