Scholarly record
STUDY OF THE LEVEL OF PERSONALIZATION IN MODERN TRAINING SYSTEMS
Abstract
With each passing day, consumers, particularly students, expect more intelligent and personalized services. The key to providing such services is the concept of a personalized learning. Applying appropriate personalized learning models to students is a process that is filled with many challenges. The aim of this article is to study the level of personalization in modern training systems. As a result, the main problems in modern software solutions for developing interactive learning content are considered. The main approaches for providing adaptive personalized learning are presented (based on prior knowledge; user modeling / profiling; adaptation rules; support for student diversity, etc.) and the key problems (technological and non-technological) in creating personalized interactive e-learning are systematized. The software components of the e-personalized training systems are differentiated. Personalized e-learning based on analysis of learners' prior knowledge is key to increasing the motivation of online learners and increasing the effectiveness of e-learning.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References12
M. Yarandi, H. Jahankhani, and A.-R. H. Tawil, ‘A personalized adaptive e-learning approach based on semantic web technology’, Webology, vol. 10, Dec. 2013.
E. Gourova, V. Kadrev, A. Stancheva, G. Petrov, and M. Dragomirova, ‘Adapting educational programmes according to e-competence needs: The Bulgarian case’, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ., vol. 11, Jun. 2014.
G. Vassileva, V. Monov, and I. Blagoev, E-LEARNING MODEL FOR PERSONALISED ONLINE EDUCATION BASED ON DATA ANALYSIS AND COMPETENCE PROFILE. 2019.
T. Atanasova, N. Filipova, S. Sulova, Y. Alexandrova, and J. Vasilev, Intelligent Analysis of Students Dataset. 2019.
M. Khademi, H. Keynejad, M. Haghshenas, and H. Kabir, E-Learning Content authoring tools and introducing a Standard Content Constructor Engine. 2011.
N. A. Alias and A. M. Zainuddin, ‘Innovation for better teaching and learning: Adopting the learning management system’, Malaysian Online J. Instr. Technol., vol. 2, pp. 27–40, Jan. 2005.
A. Sharma, ‘Learning Management System for Virtual Teaching and Learning’, World Acad. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 4, pp. 5–7, Nov. 2020.
P. Avgeriou, A. Papasalouros, S. Retalis, and E. Skordalakis, ‘Towards a Pattern Language for Learning Management Systems’, Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 6, Apr. 2003.
J. Gonzalez-Sanchez, M.-E. Chavez-Echeagaray, R. Atkinson, and W. Burleson, Towards a Pattern Language for Affective Systems. 2012.
A. Paramythis and S. Loidl-Reisinger, ‘Adaptive Learning Environments and e-Learning Standards’, Electron. J. E-Learning, vol. 2, Jan. 2004.
E. O’Donnell, S. Lawless, M. Sharp, and V. Wade, ‘A review of personalised e-learning: Towards supporting learner diversity’, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol., vol. 13, pp. 22–47, Jan. 2015.
G. Petrov, T. Stefanova, I. Bogomilov, and A. Slavinski, ‘Students’ Desired IT Positions and Preferred Areas for Additional Qualification and Practical Preparation in Tellecommunications Department’, Tech. Technol. Educ. Saf., May 2014.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

