SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

COMPARISON OF SECONDARY CRUSHING OPERATIONS THROUGH CONE AND HORIZONTAL SHAFT IMPACT CRUSHERS

Ekin Köken, Jili Qu

First published: 2020-09-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/1.1/s04.096View metrics

Abstract

Industrial size reduction processes such as crushing and grinding play vital roles in rock quarrying. The present study states real field data concerning secondary crushing operations through the cone and horizontal shaft impact (HSI) crushers. In this regard, a total of 44 case studies were collected from several rock quarries located in various parts of the world. Based on the field data, crushing performances of the cone and HSI crushers were compared by statistical analyses. The statistical analyses demonstrated that the specific energy consumption of HSI type crushers is relatively higher than those of cone crushers when comparing their production capacities. However, the difference in the specific energy consumption decreases with increasing the Los Angeles abrasion loss (LAA) of rocks. Specifically, the difference closes remarkably up when the LAA approaches 40%. It was also achieved that there is no remarkable superiority over the crushers with a specific energy consumption lower than 0.75 kWh/ton. Furthermore, the maximum feed size for cone and HSI crushers could be estimated at 12% of the mainframe opening and 39% of the rotor diameter, respectively. The ratios statistically found could be declared a start-up. These ratios are, therefore, beneficial for initial sizing related to secondary crushing operations. It was also claimed that for higher achievements in the production capacity (e.g.,> 8000 ton/day), cone crushers could be more feasible for handling rocks whose LAA is lower than 30%. Otherwise, the selection of secondary crushing equipment is associated with rock lithology, its reserve, economic constraints, targets, and marketplaces of rock aggregate manufacturers.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 4
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 2
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 11

Publication details

Title
COMPARISON OF SECONDARY CRUSHING OPERATIONS THROUGH CONE AND HORIZONTAL SHAFT IMPACT CRUSHERS
Authors
Ekin Köken, Jili Qu
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 20th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2020, Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration And Mining
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2020
Pages
789-796
SWS Citekey
Koken20204789796
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-04-0
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References12
  1. Gupta A. and Yan D. Mineral processing, desing, and operations: An introduction, Second Edition, ISBN: 978-0-444-63589-1, Elsevier Press, 2016, 856 pp.

  2. Mitchell C. J., Mitchell P., and Pascoe R. D. Quarry fines minimisation: Can we really have 10 mm aggregate with no fines? In: Proceedings of the 14th Extractive Industry Geology Conf. Scott, P.W.,Walton, G. (Eds.), 2008, pp 37 – 44.

  3. Bengtsson M. and Evertsson C.M. An empirical model for predicting flakiness in cone crushing, Int. J. Min. Proc., 79(1), 2006, pp 49 ? 60.

  4. Rajan B. and Singh D. Investigation on effects of different crushing stages on morphology of coarse and fine aggregates, Int. J. Pavement. Eng. 21(2), 2020, pp 177 ? 195.

  5. Quist J. and Evertsson C.M. Cone crusher modelling and simulation using DEM, Miner. Eng. 85, 2016, pp 92 ? 105.

  6. Djordjevic N. Shi F.N. and Morrison R.D. Applying discrete element modelling to vertical and horizontal shaft impact crushers, Miner. Eng. 16(10), 2003, pp 983 ? 991.

  7. Numbi B.P. Xia X. and Zhang J. Optimal energy control modelling of a vertical shaft impact crushing process, Energy Procedia, 61, 2014, pp 560 ? 563.

  8. Nikolov S. Modelling and simulation of particle breakage in impact crushers, Int. J. Min. Proc. 74(10), 2004, pp S219 ? S225.

  9. Rahimdel M.J. and Mohammad A. Application of analytical hirerachy process to selection of primary crusher, Int. J. Min. Sci. Tech. 24, 2014, pp 519 ? 523.

  10. Bearman R.A., Briggs C.A., and Kojovic T., The application of rock mechanics parameters to the prediction of comminution behavior, Miner. Eng., 10(3), 1997, pp 255 ? 264.

  11. Koken E. and Ozarslan A. New testing methodology for the quantification of rock crushability: Compressive crushing value (CCV), Int. J. Miner. Metal. Mater., 25(11), 2018, pp 1227 - 1236.

  12. Lee E. and Evertsson C.M. A comparative study between cone crushers and theoretically optimal crushing sequences, Miner. Eng., 24(3-4), 2011, pp 188 – 194.

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 4

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list