SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

THE ANALYSIS OF BLAST-INDUCED GROUND VIBRATION AT CAN OPEN–PIT LIGNITE MINE IN TURKEY

A. Kahriman, U. Ozer, A. Karadogan, M. Aksoy, D. Adiguzel

First published: 2006DOI pendingView metrics

Abstract

The principal disturbances created by blasting in open pit mines can be listed as ground vibrations, air blast and fly rock. All of them can, under some circumstances, cause damage to structures nearby, and can become the source of permanent conflict with the inhabitants living close to the operation site. Therefore, the prediction of ground vibration components is of great importance for the minimization of the environmental complaints. This paper presents the result of ground vibration measurements induced by bench blasting at Can Open Pit Lignite Mine located close to the residential area of Can town. Within the scope of this study, in order to predict peak particle velocity and determine the slope of the attenuation curve for this site, ground vibration components were measured for blast events during bench blast optimization studies over a long period. During the study, while the parameters of scaled distance were recorded carefully, the ground vibration components were measured by means of White Mini-Seis Model vibration monitor for 348 blast events. Afterwards, the results of these measurements have been interpreted by transferring these data to the computer aided data evaluation unit. These records have been evaluated in terms of damage norms according to international standards due to the lack of a national standards and criteria related with this subject. At the end of evaluation, an empirical relationship with reasonable correlation was established between peak particle velocity and scaled distance for this site.

Publication details

Title
THE ANALYSIS OF BLAST-INDUCED GROUND VIBRATION AT CAN OPEN–PIT LIGNITE MINE IN TURKEY
Authors
A. Kahriman, U. Ozer, A. Karadogan, M. Aksoy, D. Adiguzel
Proceedings
6th International Scientific Conference - SGEM
Publisher
SGEM Scientific GeoConference
Year
2006
Pages
61-74
SWS Citekey
Kahriman20066174
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
954-918181-2
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References23
  1. and the site observations [15] . Modeler can assign values for each operation related variables.

  2. EVALUATION OF MODEL An interactive simulation software was developed to implement the model described in the previous sections. The simulation software, in fact, was constructed as part of a complete production system modeling software of the sublevel stoping mining method. It was developed using C programming language. Since a discrete event time simulation modeling is used in the simulation, the major variables defining the activity in each event are identifie d by a statistical distribution model. The modeler can define values and statistical distributions (or related statistical parameters) for the event variables. As default, the model performs simulations employing uniform distributions. The model produces various data to be used to calculate performance or productivity data. This group of data is related to the duration of the special events, or processes, in the operation. In Figure 4, a screen capture shoving the data kept during simulation routine has been illustrated. Figure 4. The major operating variables generated for the drilling operation. A hypothetical model was used to assess the model. Below given are the major drilling pattern and equipment variables. Drilling Pattern: Parallel Cut Length of Holes (cut/stoping/empty): 4400 mm. Number of Stoping Holes: 27 Diameter of Stoping Holes: 38 mm. Number of Cut Holes: 16 Diameter of Cut Holes: 38 SGEM 200 6 - Section I 59 Diameter of Empty Hole: 102 mm Rock Drillability Index: 70 Road Rolling Resistance: 3% Grade of Road: Tree segment road, one segment has 12o down grade Drilling Units: One 1 x 16 kW Jumbo, one 2 x16 kW jumbo The results obtained using different drilling units have been illustrated on Table 2. The values given in columns 1 and 2 are obtained by the same machi nes, but different round numbers. Given in 3rd column are the results obtained by a 2 drill machine. Table 2. Simulation results using different drilling units. Drill Number x Drill Power

  3. x 16 kW 1 x 16 kW 2 x 16 kW Round Simulated 15 50 15 Tram ming Distance 4139.920, sec. 14071.167, sec. 4139.920, m. Tramming Time 3486.251, sec. 10749.143, sec. 3528.424, sec. Machine -Face Prepare Time

  4. 705, sec. 15630.383, sec. 4690.820, sec. Drilling Time Ordinary* Holes

  5. 797,sec. 402968.062,sec. 60451.891, sec. Drilling Time of Empty Holes

  6. 195, sec. 121993.086 sec. 36600.938, sec. Ordinary* Hole Meters

  7. 000, m. 8800.000, m. 2640.000, m. Empty Hole Meters 660.000, m. 2200.000, m. 660.000, m. Hole Drilling Time 157600.984,sec. 524961.12 5,sec. 97052.828, sec. Machine Stowing Time

  8. 852, sec. 7815.711, sec. 2331.410, sec. Total Round Time 168178.969,sec. 559156.312,sec. 107617.477,sec. * includes the total of cut and stoping holes The statistics given in above table can also be used in cost estimation process. A cost estimation module was developed and to be integrated in the total simulation package intended.

  9. RESULTS Simulation can be seen as a tool to experiment with the design of an engineer. It can be a valuable tool in the design work of the mining engineers, since he/she faces some difficulties in estimating performance of the possible system. Using a simulation model/software alternative operating scenarios can be developed for the system to be designed. Having identified the conditions to affect the system, suitable operating variables and the flexibilities in case of adverse conditions can be identified. The drilling simulation model developed can be used to model drilling operations in drifting. The model and therefore the software can be used for two purposes as modeling of the drilling operation and selection of the drilling machine. When using for the operation model generating aim, it can generate detailed statistics to estimate both 6th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2006 www.sgem.org Int er nat ional Confer ence SGEM 200 6 60 productivity and cost. On the other hand, the drilling machine selection can be done using the software. It is capable of simulating 1 to 4 drill jumbos. REFERENCES

  10. Sturgul, J. R., 1996, History and annotated bibliography of mine system simulation. Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Mine Simulati on via the Internet and Cyber Space , Athens,

  11. Sturgul J. R., 1995, Simulation and animation -come of age in mining, Engineering and Mining Journal , 196, 38-42.

  12. Mutagwaba, W.K. and J.A. Hudson., 1993, Use of object -oriented simulation model to asses operating and equipment conditions for underground mine transport system, Trans. Inst. Min. and Metallurgy: A, 102, A89-94.

  13. Mutagwaba, W.K., and S. Durucan, 1994, A three phase simulation model for mine transport analysis. Proc. ‘Mine Planning and Equipment Selection , Istanbul, 289-

  14. Zaiking, L., 1996, Computer simulation and its application in the extraction, conveyance and hoisting system of coal mines. Proc.26 th APCOM , Pennsylvania,

  15. Lebedev A.A., 1998Staples P., Simulation of materials handling systems in the mines: Two Case Studies, Simulation , 70, , 183 -196

  16. McNearny R.L; and Nie Z.S., 2000, Simulation of a conveyor belt network at an underground coal mine, Mineral Resources Engineering , 9, 343 -355.

  17. Runciman N; Vagenas N; Corkal T., 1997, Simulation of haulage truck loading techniques in an underground mine using WITNESS, Simulation , 68, 291-299.

  18. Frimpong S., 1995, Whiting J.M., Constrained simulation of a mine production system, Simulation , 65, 305-312.

  19. Vagena s N., 1996, Simulation modeling of a fleet of remote -controlled automatic load -haul-dump vehicles in underground mines, Simulation , 67, , 331-342.

  20. Vagenas N, 2000, Scoble, M., Corkal, T. and Baiden, G., Simulation of teleremote mining systems, CIM Bulletin , 93, 61-64.

  21. Runciman, N and Vagenas, N., Evaluation of underground drill and blast systems using discrete -event simulation, Mineral Resources Engineering , 7, 1998, 211-220.

  22. Tamrock, Handbook of underground drilling. (Tamrock, Tampere, 1983). 14] Roos, H. H., 1987, Percussion Drill Jumbos , in “Underground Mining Methods Handbook”, W.A. Hustrulid, ed., SME -AIME, pp. 1034-1049, New York.

  23. CBI, 1999, Site observations was made in 1998 and 1999. 6th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2006 www.sgem.org

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list