SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

ARSENATE AND ANTIMONATE ADSORPTION ON NATURAL MATERIALS

Barbora Doušová, Eva Bedrnová, Katerina Maxovaf, Miloslav Lhotka

First published: 2025-12-27https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2025v/4.2/s17.29View metrics

Abstract

Arsenic (As) and antimony (Sb) are highly toxic, carcinogenic elements from the same group of periodic system. They occur naturally as oxyanions, predicting their affinity to anionactive adsorbents in aqueous environment. The differences in adsorption properties of arsenate (AsO43-) and antimonate (Sb(OH)6-) were tested on natural adsorbents (zeolite, biochar, birnessite, hydrated ferric oxides - HFO) in their original and iron (Fe) or manganese (Mn) - modified forms, using the model solutions of AsO43- and SbO43-. Arsenate (AsO43-) and antimonate (Sb(OH)6-) showed a significantly higher adsorption affinity to the adsorbents with a higher pH of zero charge (pHZPC), specifically HFO, birnessite, and Fe/Mn modified adsorbents. The adsorption yield reached maximum values (99%) for the adsorbents with a high natural content of Fe/Mn (HFO, birnessite), and about 70-95% for Fe/Mn modified materials (zeolite and biochar). In any event, arsenate (AsO43-) was more intensively adsorbed compared to antimonate (Sb(OH)6-), with an increase of 3-15%.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.
Dimensions ID: pub.1199508339

Publication details

Title
ARSENATE AND ANTIMONATE ADSORPTION ON NATURAL MATERIALS
Authors
Barbora Doušová, Eva Bedrnová, Katerina Maxovaf, Miloslav Lhotka
Proceedings
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2025, Energy and Clean Technologies
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2025
Pages
267-274
SWS Citekey
Doušová202517267274
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603934
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References15
  1. Wilson S.C., Lockwood P.V., Ashley P.M., Tighe M., The chemistry and behaviour of antimony in the soil environment with comparisons to arsenic: a critical review. Environmental Pollution, vol. 158, pp. 1169�1181, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envpol.2009.10.045 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.10.045

  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Water Related Fate of the 129 Priority Pollutants; Doc. 745-R-00-007; USEPA: Washington, DC, Vol. 1, 1979.

  3. Dinake P., Mokgosi S.M., Kelebemang R., Kereeditse T.T., Motswetla, O., Pollution assessment of antimony in shooting range soils, S. Afr. J. Chem., vol. 76, 72-78, 2022. DOI: 10.17159/0379-4350/2022/v76a11

  4. Mitsunobu S., Takahashi Y., Sakai, Y., Abiotic reduction of antimony(V) by green rust (Fe4(II)Fe2(III)(OH)12SO4.3H2O), Chemosphere, vol. 70, 942-947, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.021

  5. Anjum M., Miandad R., Waqas M., Gehany F., Barakat M., Remediation of wastewater using various nano-materials, Arab. J. Chem., vol. 12, 4897�4919, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.10.004

  6. Li X., Wu X., Liu S., Li Y., Fan J., Lv K., Effects of fluorine on photocatalysis, Chin. J. Catal., vol. 41, 1451�1467, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63594-X

  7. Chen L, Chen X.L, Zhou C.H, Yang H.M, Ji S.F, Tong D.S, Zhong Z.K, Yu W.H, Chu M.Q., Environmental-friendly montmorillonite-biochar composites: Facile production and tunable adsorption-release of ammonium and phosphate, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 156, pp. 648�659, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.050

  8. Dousova B., Fuitova L., Grygar T., Machovic V., Kolousek D., Herzogova L., Lhotka M., Modified aluminosilicates as low cost sorbents of As(III) from anoxic groundwater, J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 165, pp. 34�140, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jhazmat.2008.09.088 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.088

  9. Dousova B., Kolousek D., Keppert M., Machovic V., Lhotka M., Urbanova M., Brus J., Holcova L., Use of waste ceramics in adsorption technologies, Applied Clay Science, vol. 134, pp. 145-152, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2016.02.016

  10. Fiol N., Villaescusa I., Determination of sorbent point zero charge: usefulness in sorption studies, Environ. Chem. Lett., vol. 7, pp. 79-84, 2009. https: //doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/s10311-008-0139-0

  11. Sherman D.M., Randall S.R., Surface complexation of arsenic (V) to iron (III) (hydr)oxides: Structural mechanism from ab initio molecular geometries and EXAFSspectroscopy, Geochimica et Cosmochimica. Acta, vol. 67/issue 22, pp. 4223-4230, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00237-0

  12. Dousova B., Grygar T., Martaus A., Fuitova L., Kolousek D., Machovic V., Sorption of AsV on aluminosilicates treated with FeII nanoparticles, Journal of Colloidand Interface Science, vol. 302, pp. 424-431, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.06.054

  13. Bonin D, Method of removing arsenic species from an aqueous medium usingmodified zeolite minerals, US Patent no. 6,042,731, 2000.

  14. Dousova B., Lhotka M., Bedrnova E., Use of low-grade and recycled materials as selective arsenate and antimonate sorbents. In: 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, vol. 22, No. 4.2, 133�139, 2022. https://doi.org./DOI: 10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2/s18.17

  15. McKenzie R. J. M., The synthesis of birnessite, cryptomelane, and some other oxides and hydroxides of manganese, Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 38, pp. 493-502, 1971. DOI: 10.1180/minmag.1971.038.296.12

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list