SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GEOSPATIAL DATA RECEIVED BY TLS AND UAV TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE QUARRY

Bartosz Mitka

First published: 2018-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/2.3/s10.008View metrics

Abstract

Currently, it is possible to capture geospatial data, which represents terrain surfaces in the form of point cloud, by using two diametrically different technologies: laser scanning and ?structure from motion? technology which is based on sets of properly acquired 2D photos. Both of these technologies allow to obtain a substantially the same product - point cloud, although it is a direct measurement product from laser scanning technology (TLS), while in the case of the structure from motion technology it is a derived product of the source data processing, such as photos. The article presents the results of comparative research both in the preparation and implementation of measurements, as well as the processing of data, which were captured by TLS technology and by the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) (equipped with a digital camera). The products of point cloud: Digital Surface Models and Digital Terrain Models have also been analysed. Geometric compatibility of the obtained data, their completeness and density of information obtained depending on the terrain and vegetation cover were examined. The research object was a quarry in Lutowiska, which is located in the mountainous area of Bieszczady in the south-eastern part of Poland. The measurements from TLS and UAV were developed on the basis of the same Geodetic Control Points, expressed in the PL-2000 geodetic coordinates system (EPSG 2179). This allowed the assumption that all geometrical differences between the developed products come from the use of various data acquisition and processing techniques. For each of the technologies, depending on the total time required to carry out the works, the total project cost was also estimated. The work was conducted by using the same hardware configuration and by operators of similar advancement level. Both technologies are equally mastered and used in professional practice by authors which also allows to prepare an objective analysis. The works (carried out in this way) allowed not only to a reliably compare the geometrical characteristics of analogous products coming from two different measurement methods, but also to compare the timeconsuming and costs of their implementation.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 3
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 4

Publication details

Title
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GEOSPATIAL DATA RECEIVED BY TLS AND UAV TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE QUARRY
Authors
Bartosz Mitka
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2018, Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2018
Pages
57-64
SWS Citekey
Mitka2018105764
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-41-6
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References0
0references registered for this publication

Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 1

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list