SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

ASSESSMENT OF THREE HYDROLOGICAL ROUTING MODELS COUPLED TO THE SURFEX LAND SURFACE MODEL (ISBA SCHEME): AN EXAMPLE OF VARBITSA RIVER BASIN IN BULGARIA

Petko Tsarev, Eram Artinyan, Cédric H. David

First published: 2021-12-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2021/3.1/s12.08View metrics

Abstract

The article is about three hydrological river routing models (RRM) implemented in Bulgaria, coupled to a land surface model (LSM), mainly for flood forecasting purpose. For the evaluation of the three RRMs the authors use a river basin of Mediterranean climate - the Varbitsa River with catchment area of 1200 km2. The river is prone to dangerous flash floods because of their fast propagation. LSM SURFEX (Surface Externalisee) but formally the integrated part ISBA (Interface Soil Biosphere Atmosphere) is used to compute the moisture and energy fluxes over land, including: the surface runoff, ground and snow water storage, and deep drainage. The authors describe the river routing methods, the implementation and the results of three alternative distributed hydrological models used to accumulate and propagate the runoff and to compute streamflow at scales from the river reach to the river basin. MODCOU (Modele hydrogeologique couple), coupled with ISBA, is the first distributed hydrological model implemented for Varbitsa River basin. The river routing part of MODCOU, based on the notion of isochronous zones, is considered. At second place, the authors describe the routing part of TOPODYN based on TOPMODEL that was included in SURFEX version 7.2 for better simulation of Mediterranean flash floods. The third described RRM coupled to SURFEX is RAPID (Routing Application for Parallel computation of Discharge). The models are applied for the period 04.2020 to 03.2021 that contains several high flow peaks and a dry period. Simulated streamflow discharges with the three RRMs are compared to the measured river flow at two hydrological stations with nested catchments. The comparison is not exhaustive as the three RRMs are coupled to different versions of ISBA-SURFEX. Authors do not emphasise at statistical scores of model results but aim to give an overview of scientific and computational features of each of the river routing methods, with special attention to representation of high flow peaks. The simulations with the three coupled applications of LSM and RRM over the considered period show greater differences for the smaller considered catchment and rather similar results for the larger one.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 1

Publication details

Title
ASSESSMENT OF THREE HYDROLOGICAL ROUTING MODELS COUPLED TO THE SURFEX LAND SURFACE MODEL (ISBA SCHEME): AN EXAMPLE OF VARBITSA RIVER BASIN IN BULGARIA
Authors
Petko Tsarev, Eram Artinyan, Cédric H. David
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 21st SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2021, Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2021
Pages
59-66
SWS Citekey
Tsarev2021125966
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-24-8
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References12
  1. Artinyan, E., Habets, F., Noilhan, J., Ledoux, E., Dimitrov, D., Martin, E., Le Moigne, P., Modelling the water budget and the riverflows of the Maritsa basin in Bulgaria. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 12. DOI: 10.5194/hessd-4-475-2007, 2008.

  2. Bouilloud, L., Chancibault, K., Vincendon, B., Ducrocq, V., Habets, F., Saulnier, G., Anquetin, S., Martin, E., & Noilhan, J., Coupling the ISBA Land Surface Model and the TOPMODEL Hydrological Model for Mediterranean Flash-Flood Forecasting: Description, Calibration, and Validation, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 11(2), 315-333, 2010.

  3. Vincendon, B., ISBA-TOP Hydro-Meteorological coupling: Users and Developers guide (for SURFEX 8.1) December 2017, CNRS, Météo-France, 2017.

  4. Dümenil, L. and Todini, E., A rainfall-runoff scheme for use in the Hamburg climate model. In: O’Kane, J. (Ed), Advances in theoretical hydrology, A tribute to James Dooge. European Geophysical Society Series in Hydrological Sciences. Volume1, pp.129–157. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992.

  5. Quintana Seguí, Pere & Martin, Eric & Habets, Florence & Noilhan, J., Improvement, calibration and validation of a distributed hydrological model over France. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 13. DOI: 10.5194/hess-13-163-2009, 2009.

  6. Vincendon B., Ducrocq V., Saulnier G.M., Bouilloud L., Chancibault K., Habets F., Noilhan J., Advantages of coupling the ISBA land surface model with a TOPMODEL hydrological model dedicated to Mediterranean flash floods, Journal of Hydrology, 394(1-2), 256-266, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.012, 2010.

  7. Lehner, B., Verdin, K., Jarvis, A., New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos, Transactions, AGU, 89(10): 93-94, 2008.

  8. Gomez, E., Ledoux, E., Monget, J-M., Marsily, G., Distributed surface-groundwater coupled model applied to climate or long term water management impacts at basin scale. European Water 1/2: 3-8, 2003. © 2003 E.W. Publications, 2003

  9. David, C. H., Maidment, D. R., Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Habets, F., Eijkhout, V., “River Network Routing on the NHDPlus Dataset,” Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 913–934, Oct. 2011.

  10. Le Moigne, P., Besson, F. Martin, E., Boé, J., Decharme, B., Etchevers, P., Faroux, S., Habets, F., Lafaysse, M., Leroux, D., Rousset, F... The Latest Improvements in SURFEX v8.0 of the Safran-Isba-Modcou Hydrometeorological Model over France. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2020-31, 2020.

  11. Decharme, B., Boone, A., Delire, C., and Noilhan, J.: Local evaluation of the Interaction between Soil Biosphere Atmosphere soil multilayer diffusion scheme using four pedotransfer functions, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D20 126, DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016002, 2011.

  12. Lovat, A., Vincendon, B., Ducrocq, V., Assessing the impact of resolution and soil datasets on flash-flood modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions. 1-33. DOI: 10.5194/hess-2018-374, 2018.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list