SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

DATA SOURCE EVALUATION FOR SHORELINE DELINIATION APPLICATIONS

Julia Ahlen, Stefan Seipel, Marie-Loise Kautz

First published: 2017-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017/21/s08.108View metrics

Abstract

This paper proposes an evaluation of data acquired with various sensors and used in coastal water segmentation applications. Correct monitoring of coastal changes in dynamic coastal environments strongly depends on accurate and frequent detection of shoreline position. Automatic shoreline delineation methods are preferable, especially in terms of time, cost, labor intensiveness and difficulties of in-situ measurements. Two main issues have been encountered within this application field, the quality of data and the segmentation algorithms. In this work, potential benefits of various data sources including optical and active sensors for extraction of shorelines have been investigated. The goal with shoreline detection from digital data sources is to obtain information as efficiently as possible and as reliably as necessary. Starting with that observation the paper discusses the effectiveness of coastal information extraction provided different data sources. This question is especially important to address since we observe a fast development of high spatial resolution data acquisition. There are many of segmentation algorithms described in the field of image processing and yet there is currently no single theory or method, no universal segmentation framework, that can be applied on all images to precisely and robustly extract shorelines. Nether there is a uniform standard for the assessment of segmentation results, and this process still largely relies on visual analysis and personal judgment. Out of myriads of image segmentation algorithms, we chose the most frequently and successfully applied within the application field and considering the data sources. In optical sensor data cases, the most frequently used methods are NDWI (Normalized Difference Water Index) and thresholding techniques. We do not aim to create yet another method to segment out the particular objects from remotely sensed data and then tailor it to work efficiently on that data set. Instead, we evaluate the data quality regarding the given application field. The case study is carried out on a 10 km coastal stretch facing the Baltic Sea (Sweden) and belonging to the Municipality of GпїЅvle. In citu measurements were acquired to evaluate the extracted coastal lines and comparisons with reference were performed based on the average mean distance. A conclusion is done regarding the most reliable data source for this particular application of shoreline delineation.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
DATA SOURCE EVALUATION FOR SHORELINE DELINIATION APPLICATIONS
Authors
Julia Ahlen, Stefan Seipel, Marie-Loise Kautz
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2017, Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2017
Pages
849-858
SWS Citekey
Ahlen20178849858
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-01-0
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Brinkmann, W. A. Causes of variability in monthly Great Lakes water supplies and lake levels. Climate Research, vol. 15(2), 2000, pp.151-160.

  2. R. M. Goncalves and J. L. Awange. (2017) Three Most Widely Used GNSS-Based Shoreline Monitoring Methods to Support Integrated Coastal Zone Management Policies. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 05017003. Online publication date: 27-Feb-2017.

  3. Yousef, A., Iftekharuddin, K. Shoreline extraction from the fusion of LiDAR DEM data and aerial images using mutual information and genetic algorithms. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2014 International Joint Conference on, pp.1007-1014. DOI: 10.1109/IJCNN.2014.6889863.

  4. Wernette, P., Shortridge, A., Lusch, D.P. and Arbogast, A.F. Accounting for positional uncertainty in historical shoreline change analysis without ground reference information. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 38:13, 2017, pp. 3906- 3922. Online publication date: 3-Apr-2017.

  5. Kermani, S., Boutiba, M., Guendouz, M., Guettouche, M.S. and Khelfani, D. (2016) Detection and analysis of shoreline changes using geospatial tools and automatic computation: Case of jijelian sandy coast (East Algeria). Ocean & Coastal Management Vol.132, pp. 46-58. Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016.

  6. Blain, C., Linzell, R., & McKay, P. (n.d). Simple Methodology for Deriving Continuous Shorelines from Imagery: Application to Rivers. Journal Of Waterway Port Coastal And Ocean Engineering, vol. 139(5), pp. 365-382.

  7. Pardo-Pascual, J. E., Almonacid-Caballer, J., Ruiz, L. A., & Palomar-Vázquez, J. (2012). Automatic extraction of shorelines from Landsat TM and ETM+ multi-temporal images with subpixel precision. Remote Sensing Of Environment, vol.123, pp.1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.024.

  8. Gonçalves, G. )., Sousa, E. )., Figueiredo, I. )., & Duro, N. ). Automatic extraction of tide-coordinated shoreline using open source software and Landsat imagery. International Archives Of The Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing And Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, vol. 40(7W3), 2015, pp. 953-957. DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W3-953-2015.

  9. Al Fugura, A., Billa, L., & Pradhan, B. Semi-automated procedures for shoreline extraction using single RADARSAT-1 SAR image. Estuarine, Coastal And Shelf Science, 2011, pp. 95395-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.10.009.

  10. Lee, I.-C., Cheng, L. and Li, R. Optimal parameter determination for mean-shift segmentation-based shoreline extraction using lidar data, aerial orthophotos, and satellite imagery, 2013, BASE, EBSCOhost (accessed April 25, 2017).

  11. Wu, H., Liu, C., Zhang, Y. and Sun, W. “Water feature extraction from aerial-image fused with airborne lidar data,” in Urban Remote Sensing Event, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–7.

  12. Åhlén, J., Seipel, S., Segmentation of shadows and water bodies in high resolution images using ancillary data, 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2016: SGEM2016 Conference Proceedings : Book 2, 2016, Vol. 1, 827-834.

  13. Zhang, H., Jiang Q., Xu J. Coastline Extraction Using Support Vector Machine from Remote Sensing Image, Journal of multimedia, vol. 8(2), 2013, pp.175-182.

  14. Hu, X., Qin, Z., Wang, J. and Su, G. Coastline Extraction on Remote Sensing Image Using Gaussian Process Classification, Atlantis Press, 2015.

  15. Cassé, C., Viet, P.B., Nhung, P., Dao, H., International Symposium on Geoinformatics for Spatial Infrastructure Development in Earth and Allied Sciences, 2012.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database