SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

ONE APPROACH TO DECISION MAKING IN THE TASK OF MILTI-OBJECT OPTIMIZATION

M. S. Petrov, Vyatcheslav Kolbin

First published: 2020-09-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/5.2/s21.046View metrics

Abstract

The decision making theory finds its application literally at any field of science, especially at geosciences, because working with natural resources requires the most accurate tools. This paper considers one question of the given theory, which is called the solution priority problem. The priority problem in multi-object optimization is quite complex, many authors understand it in their own way. Perhaps this is because now the theory of multi-purpose optimization is in its infancy: there is no holistic understanding of the priority problem from its definition and task to its consideration. However, this work is not intended to bring final clarity to this issue, this task should be solved in the near future. There are numerous approaches to define improvability of the given solution, but this work considers only one of it. The considered approach can be applied for defining of solution improvability in the field of multi-objective optimization. This approach is based on applying of simple preference relation of one solution to another one. For defining the task of multi-object optimization a vector criteria consisting of solutions of the task is given. After the task of multi-purpose optimization is formulated, the problem arises of determining the principle of choosing the elements that are optimal according to this principle and according to a given priority, or taking into account a given priority when using any principle, depending on which of the following sample set of cases is implemented. Moreover, the conditions under which the given solution is unimprovable (so it is Pareto optimal) have been shown. If the Pareto optimal element is unique, then it is a solution to the problem of multi-purpose optimization; if the set of Pareto optimal elements contains a significant number of elements, then it is here that the problem of narrowing this set arises on the basis of priority, restrictions, etc., finding optimal and super-optimal elements. The results presented in this paper should help solve this problem. At the end of the work, improvability and optimum conditions by given preference relations also have been presented.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
ONE APPROACH TO DECISION MAKING IN THE TASK OF MILTI-OBJECT OPTIMIZATION
Authors
M. S. Petrov, Vyatcheslav Kolbin
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2020, Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2020
Pages
373-380
SWS Citekey
Petrov202021373380
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-11-8
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References35
  1. Kolbin V.V. Decision making and programming. World Scientific Publ. Company. Singapore, 2003. 745 p.

  2. Petrov M.M, Kolbin V.V. One Approach to the Problem of Multi-Objective Optimization Solutions Improvement // Process Management and Scientific Developments. Birmingham, UK: Infinity, 2020. р. 45-49.

  3. Petrov M.M, Kolbin V.V. One Approach to Researching the Priority Problem in the Tasks of Multi-object Optimization // Process Management and Scientific Developments. Birmingham, UK: Infinity, 2020. р. 49-54.

  4. Aizerman M.A., Aleskerov F.T. Choosing og the variants: fundamentals of the theory, Moscow, Nauka, 1990.

  5. Wilkas A., I. Optimum in games and solutions, Nauka, Moscow, 1990.

  6. Williams A.C. On stochastic linear programming. J. Soc. Induzt. Appl. MTH. 927- 940, 1965.

  7. Kiruta A.Ya., Maiminas E.Z. Solutions: theory, information, modelling. Radio i svyaz, Moscow, 1981.

  8. Shtoier R. Multi-criteria optimization. Theory, computation and application. Radio i svyaz, Moscow, 1992.

  9. Larichev O.I. Science and the art of decision-making. Nauka, Moscow, 1979.

  10. Main H., Osaki S. Markov processes in decision-making. Nauka, Moscow, 1977.

  11. Truhaev R. I. Models of decision-making under uncertainty. Nauka, Moscow, 1981.

  12. Fishburn, Peter C. Utiliti theory for decision making / Peter C. Fishburn New York, 1970.

  13. Yudin D.B. Computational methods of decision-making theory. Nauka, Moscow, 1989.

  14. Abramov L.M., Kapustin V.F. Mathematical programming. SPbU publ., Leningrad, 1976.

  15. Karlin S. Mathematical methods in game theory, programming and economy. Mir, Moscow, 1964

  16. Germeier Yu.B. Introduction to operation research. Nauka, Moscow, 1972.

  17. Ioffe A.D., Tikhomirov V.M. Theory of extremal problems. SPbU publ., Leningrad 1974.

  18. Zubov V.I., Petrosyan L.A. The problem of capital distribution. SPbU publ., Leningrad 1971.

  19. Zubov V.I., Petrosyan L.A. Mathematical methods for planning. SPbU publ., Leningrad, 1982

  20. Yudin D.B. Mathematical methods of control under conditions of incomplete information. Soviet radio, Moscow, 1989

  21. Demianov V.F. Malozemov V.N. Introduction to minimax. Nauka, Moscow, 1972.

  22. Zhukovin V.E. Multi-criteria models of decision-making under uncertainty. Nauka, Moscow, 1983.

  23. Zhukovin V.E. Models and procedures of decision-making. Nauka, Moscow, 1981.

  24. Karmanov V.G. Mathematical programming. Nauka, Moscow, 1975.

  25. Melamed I. I. Linear convolution in multi-criteria optimization. Avtomatica I telemekhanika, Moscow, 1997, p. 119-125.

  26. Mirzoakhmedov F., Milakhevich M.V. Applied aspects of stochastic programming. Nauka, Moscow, 1989.

  27. Neiman J., Morgenshtern O. Game theory and economic behavior. Nauka, Мoscow, 1970.

  28. Tabak A., Kuo B. Optimal control and mathematical programming. Nauka, Moscow, 1975.

  29. Kozeletskyi Yu. Psicological theory of decisions. Progress, Moscow, 1979.

  30. George F.H. Problem solving, 1980.

  31. Fishburn P.C. General theory of subjective probabilities and expected utilities. Ann. Math. Statistics, 40, 1969.

  32. Fishburn P.C. Even-chance lotteries in social choice theory. Theory and Decision, 18-40, 1972.

  33. Packard D.J. A preference logic minimally complete for expected utility maximization. J. Philosophical logic, 223-235, 1975.

  34. Packard D.J. Preference relations. J. Math. Psych. 295-306, 1979.

  35. Wets R. Stochastic programs with fixed recourse. SIAM Rev., 309-339, 1974.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database