SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

THE PROBLEM OF VALUING THE RESULTS OF LCA IN MONETARY TERMS

Agnieszka Janik

First published: 2015-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2015/b53/s21.090View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2
PLUMX see details

Publication details

Title
THE PROBLEM OF VALUING THE RESULTS OF LCA IN MONETARY TERMS
Authors
Agnieszka Janik
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2015, ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2015
Pages
697-704
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-41-4
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References32

  1. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015

  2. Baran J., Janik A., Ryszko, A., Knowledge based eco-innovative product design and development - conceptual model built on life cycle approach, SGEM2014 Conference on Arts, Performing Arts, Architecture and Design. SGEM 2014 Conference Proceedings. ISBN 978-619-7105-30-8, Albena, Bulgaria, 2014, pp. 775-787.

  3. de Bruyn S., Korteland M., Markowska A., Davidson M., de Jong F., Bles M., Sevenster M., Shadow Prices Handbook. Valuation and weighting of emissions and environmental impacts, CE Delft, March 2010, pp. 61-99.

  4. Desaigues B., Ami D., Bartczak A., Braun- Kohlová M., Chilton S., M., Farreras V., Hunt A., Hutchison M., Jeanrenaud C., Kaderjak P., Máca V., Markiewicz O, Metcalf H., Navrud S., Nielsen J.S., Ortiz R., Pellegrini S., Rabl A., Riera R., Scasny M., Szántó R., Urban J., Final Report on the monetary valuation of mortality and morbidity risks from air pollution. NEED Project, Paris, 2007.

  5. Dong Y., Laurent A., Hauschild M.Z., Recommended assessment framework, characterization models and factors for environmental impacts and resource use, Report prepared within the EC 7 th framework project PROSUITE, Denmark, 2013, pp. 5-16.

  6. EN ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, 2006.

  7. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Characterisation factors of the ILCD Recommended Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods. Database and Supporting Information, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2012, p. 10-23.

  8. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Framework and Requirements for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Models and Indicators, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2010, p. 12-29.

  9. Goedkoop M., Spriensma R., The Eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology report, Pre Consultants B.V, Amersfoort 2000, s. 53-75

  10. Hendrinks Ch. F., Vogtl ӓnder J.G., Janssen G.M.T., The Eco-costs/value ratio, a tool to determine the long-term strategy of de-linking economy and environmental ecology, International Journal of Ecodynamics, vol. 1, no 2, 2006, pp. 136-148.

  11. Itsubo N., Inaba A., LIME 2. Life-cycle Impact assessment Method based on Endpoint modeling, JLCA NEWS, no 12, 2012, pp. 1-16.

  12. Jan ik A., Considering the Value of Life Year (VOLY) in Technology Assessment (TA) – case of Poland. 25 Th IBIMA Conference on Innovation Vision 2020: from Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth. ISBN 978-0- 9860419-4-5, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2015.

  13. Ott W., Baur M., Kaufmann Y., Frischknecht R., Steiner R., Assessment of Biodiversity Losses. Final report, NEEDS Project, Zurich, 2006, pp. 22-63.

  14. Ponsioen T.C., Vieira M.D.M., Goedkoop M.J., Surplus cost as a life cycle impact indicator for fossil resource depletion, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment vol. 19, 2014, pp. 872–881.

  15. Teki e H., Lindblad M., Methodologies for monetary valuation of environmental impacts - State of the art, CPM the Swedish Life Cycle Center, Gothenburg, 2013, pp. 22-25.

  16. WHO , The global burden of disease: 2004 update, WHO Press, Geneva, 2008, pp. 1- 51. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

  17. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015

  18. Baran J., Janik A., Ryszko, A., Knowledge based eco-innovative product design and development - conceptual model built on life cycle approach, SGEM2014 Conference on Arts, Performing Arts, Architecture and Design. SGEM 2014 Conference Proceedings. ISBN 978-619-7105-30-8, Albena, Bulgaria, 2014, pp. 775-787.

  19. de Bruyn S., Korteland M., Markowska A., Davidson M., de Jong F., Bles M., Sevenster M., Shadow Prices Handbook. Valuation and weighting of emissions and environmental impacts, CE Delft, March 2010, pp. 61-99.

  20. Desaigues B., Ami D., Bartczak A., Braun- Kohlová M., Chilton S., M., Farreras V., Hunt A., Hutchison M., Jeanrenaud C., Kaderjak P., Máca V., Markiewicz O, Metcalf H., Navrud S., Nielsen J.S., Ortiz R., Pellegrini S., Rabl A., Riera R., Scasny M., Szántó R., Urban J., Final Report on the monetary valuation of mortality and morbidity risks from air pollution. NEED Project, Paris, 2007.

  21. Dong Y., Laurent A., Hauschild M.Z., Recommended assessment framework, characterization models and factors for environmental impacts and resource use, Report prepared within the EC 7 th framework project PROSUITE, Denmark, 2013, pp. 5-16.

  22. EN ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, 2006.

  23. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Characterisation factors of the ILCD Recommended Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods. Database and Supporting Information, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2012, p. 10-23.

  24. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Framework and Requirements for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Models and Indicators, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2010, p. 12-29.

  25. Goedkoop M., Spriensma R., The Eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology report, Pre Consultants B.V, Amersfoort 2000, s. 53-75

  26. Hendrinks Ch. F., Vogtl ӓnder J.G., Janssen G.M.T., The Eco-costs/value ratio, a tool to determine the long-term strategy of de-linking economy and environmental ecology, International Journal of Ecodynamics, vol. 1, no 2, 2006, pp. 136-148.

  27. Itsubo N., Inaba A., LIME 2. Life-cycle Impact assessment Method based on Endpoint modeling, JLCA NEWS, no 12, 2012, pp. 1-16.

  28. Jan ik A., Considering the Value of Life Year (VOLY) in Technology Assessment (TA) – case of Poland. 25 Th IBIMA Conference on Innovation Vision 2020: from Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth. ISBN 978-0- 9860419-4-5, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2015.

  29. Ott W., Baur M., Kaufmann Y., Frischknecht R., Steiner R., Assessment of Biodiversity Losses. Final report, NEEDS Project, Zurich, 2006, pp. 22-63.

  30. Ponsioen T.C., Vieira M.D.M., Goedkoop M.J., Surplus cost as a life cycle impact indicator for fossil resource depletion, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment vol. 19, 2014, pp. 872–881.

  31. Teki e H., Lindblad M., Methodologies for monetary valuation of environmental impacts - State of the art, CPM the Swedish Life Cycle Center, Gothenburg, 2013, pp. 22-25.

  32. WHO , The global burden of disease: 2004 update, WHO Press, Geneva, 2008, pp. 1- 51. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list