SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

COMPARING PERFORMANCE OF STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED CATALYSTS IN DRY REFORMING OF METHANE

Ivan Mitrichev

First published: 2018-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/6.1/s24.015View metrics

Abstract

This study has its aim to compare the performance of modern structured and unstructured catalysts in a dry reforming of methane (DRM). DRM is used to obtain a mixture of H2 and CO with almost equal fractions of both products, which is subsequently used in synthesis of some chemical valuable products. The kinetic scheme for tungsten carbide (WC) catalyst was taken from the literature. Using the experimental data for a fixed bed catalyst, we have fitted the parameters of the kinetic scheme of DRM on WC catalyst. The reaction rates in our model are calculated using the microkinetic approach, the format used allows for direct incorporation of the model into CFD (computational fluid dynamics) calculation. The kinetic model obtained was used to simulate the DRM in a foam reactor using the CFD approach. We compare the results with the experimental conversion data for the membrane reactor and the fixed bed catalytic reactor. This comparison is based on the equal linear velocity and the equal catalyst mass. Under the conditions studied, the foam catalyst does not show any gain obtained due to complex structure and flow distribution. We explain why the membrane reactor should be preferred to other types of catalytic reactors being considered.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
COMPARING PERFORMANCE OF STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED CATALYSTS IN DRY REFORMING OF METHANE
Authors
Ivan Mitrichev
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2018, Nano, Bio and Green - Technologies for a Sustainable Future
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2018
Pages
107-114
SWS Citekey
Mitrichev201824107114
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-50-8
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References10
  1. Krylov, O.V. (2000). Dry reforming of methane to syngas. Russian Chemical Journal, V.44 (1), 19-33.

  2. Aramouni, N. A. K., Touma, J. G., Tarboush, B. A., Zeaiter, J., & Ahmad, M. N. (2018). Catalyst design for dry reforming of methane: Analysis review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, V. 82, P. 3, 2570-2585.

  3. Claridge, J. B., York, A. P., Brungs, A. J., Marquez-Alvarez, C., Sloan, J., Tsang, S. C., & Green, M. L. (1998). New catalysts for the conversion of methane to synthesis gas: molybdenum and tungsten carbide. Journal of catalysis, 180(1), 85-100.

  4. Iyer, M. V., Norcio, L. P., Kugler, E. L., & Dadyburjor, D. B. (2003). Kinetic modeling for methane reforming with carbon dioxide over a mixed-metal carbide catalyst. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 42(12), 2712-2721.

  5. Kislov, V.R., Kryzhnovskiy, A.S., & Skudin, V.V. (2013). Comparison of membrane reactors with conventional reactor on the example of dry reforming of methane (in Russian). Uspekhi v himii i khimicheskoy promyshlennosti, V. XXVII(4), 73-77.

  6. Liu, H., Li, S., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Zhou, G., Chen, L., & Wang, X. (2008). Catalytic performance of novel Ni catalysts supported on SiC monolithic foam in carbon dioxide reforming of methane to synthesis gas. Catalysis Communications, 9(1), 51-54.

  7. Alexandrov, A.V., Gavrilova, N.N., Kislov, V.R., & Skudin, V.V. (2017). Comparison of membrane and conventional reactors under dry methane reforming conditions. Petroleum Chemistry, V. 57(9), 804-812.

  8. Mitrichev, I. I., Zhensa, A. V., & Kol’tsova, E. M. (2017). Thermodynamic criteria for estimating the kinetic parameters of catalytic reactions. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 91(1), 44-51.

  9. Lee, J. S., & Boudart, M. (1991). Reactivity of tungsten carbides I. Catalytic and temperature-programmed reactions of methanol. Catalysis Letters, 8(2-4), 107-114.

  10. ANSYS, Inc. (2016) ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 17.1. ANSYS, Inc.: Canonsburg, PA, USA. 202p.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database