SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

CONSIDERATION ON APPRAISAL OF THE RESERVOIR PRESSURE BY GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Cristina Jugastreanu

First published: 2018-11-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018v/1.5/s01.004View metrics

Abstract

Establishing of pore fluids pressure is one of the critical challenges encountered in the formations opening in drilling. Pores fluids pressure evaluation through geophysical methods involves live recordings of the collector parameters using LWD (Logging While Drilling)/MWD (Measurements While Drilling) techniques. Empirical relationships of the dependence of pore pressure and the measured parameters use exponents whose values are accepted as constant. These exponents were determined on the basis of experimental data on certain oil fields or structures. These exponents can be considered constant for that area or structure, but cannot be extended to all basins, especially because in the evolution of normal clays, large differences occur from one basin to another due to both the very different clay composition (lower or higher content of quartz, silt, mica, calcite, organic matter, different clay minerals) as well as different geological and tectonic evolutions. Studies conducted by various researchers on different types of clay show that compaction of clays cannot follow a general law, but it is admitted, however, in the first approximation, that the analysis of geophysical parameters with depth allows obtaining of pressure data valid over an important depth range or geological age. In this study will be analyzed the variation of the exponent used in B. Eaton's relation for calculating the formation pressure from the electrical resistivity data. Electrical devices for conductivity measuring do not give the same values in the clay formations due to the anisotropy of this type of rocks (different vertical and horizontal resistivities). Beside the above mentioned causes of variation for ? exponent, can be highlighted also the following additional factors which affect the resistivity values measurements: (1) the temperature that increases with the depth, causing a decrease in resistivity for waters with the same salinity; (2) the presence of hydrocarbons in the porous clay space has the effect of increasing its resistivity considerably; (3) the presence of organic matter in significant proportions in the clays leads to the increase of the resistivity and the underestimation of the pressure in the pores. The following study is focused on the validation of the reservoir pressure based on the processing of electrical diagrams, valid for clay of a certain type of lithology and a certain age in a sedimentary basin. To get the value of the exponent ? from B. Eaton equation will be used the equivalent depth method ? estimation of pore pressures. Consequently, the scope will be the analysis of the B. Eaton's equation exponent ? variation for the accurate estimation of the formation pressure from the electrical resistivity data. The authors suggest a new approach for pore fluid pressure evaluation (in order to establish a different value for ? exponent). This is necessary in the case of abnormal pore pressure (abnormal clay compaction) and influenced by geological age and lithology of the formation.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 1

Publication details

Title
CONSIDERATION ON APPRAISAL OF THE RESERVOIR PRESSURE BY GEOPHYSICAL METHODS
Authors
Cristina Jugastreanu
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 18th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2018, Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration And Mining
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2018
Pages
27-34
SWS Citekey
Jugastreanu201812734
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-72-0
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References0
0references registered for this publication

Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list