SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

Microbial platforms for sustainable aviation fuel production: Metabolic pathways, engineering constraints, and biorefinery integration

Odi Fawwaz Alrebei

First published: 2024https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024v/3.2/s06.44View metrics

Abstract

Sustainable aviation fuels represent the most viable near-term option for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation sector, as they can be deployed within existing aircraft and fuel infrastructure. Despite significant advances in microbial metabolic engineering, the contribution of biological platforms to aviation fuel supply remains marginal, indicating persistent limitations that extend beyond laboratory-scale performance. This review provides a critical analysis of microbial systems proposed for sustainable aviation fuel production, examining their metabolic architectures, physiological boundaries, and compatibility with industrial fuel requirements. Major biological routes are evaluated, including fatty acid-based platforms, isoprenoid biosynthesis, direct biological hydrocarbon formation, and platform chemical intermediates. Instead of focusing solely on conventional metrics such as titer or yield, the analysis integrates biological constraints with downstream upgrading severity, hydrogen demand, regulatory blend limits, and biorefinery integration. Across diverse pathways, convergent bottlenecks emerge, including high redox and energy requirements for hydrocarbon biosynthesis, toxicity of fuel-range molecules to microbial hosts, kinetic limitations of terminal enzymes, and genetic instability under sustained production. In parallel, pathways that achieve robust fermentation performance frequently require energy- and hydrogen-intensive catalytic finishing to meet aviation fuel specifications, decoupling biological efficiency from overall process viability. These findings reveal a systemic misalignment between what microorganisms naturally produce and what aviation infrastructure can accept as certified fuel. The review concludes that transformative progress is unlikely to arise from incremental optimization of isolated metabolic pathways. Instead, it depends on integrated biorefinery concepts and hybrid bio-thermochemical strategies that explicitly co-design microbial metabolism with downstream processing requirements.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 2
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 37
Dimensions ID: pub.1201680001

Publication details

Title
Microbial platforms for sustainable aviation fuel production: Metabolic pathways, engineering constraints, and biorefinery integration
Authors
Odi Fawwaz Alrebei
Proceedings
Not available yet
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2024
Pages
391-396
SWS Citekey
Alrebei20247391396
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-76-7
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References14
  1. Lee D. S., Fahey D. W., Skowron A., et al., The contribution of global aviation toanthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018, Atmospheric Environment, UK, 2021,pp. 117834. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834

  2. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Environmental Protection:Aviation Emissions, ICAO, Canada, 2022.

  3. Schafer A. W., Barrett S. R. H., Doyme K., et al., Technological, economic andenvironmental prospects of all-electric aircraft, Nature Energy, UK, 2016, pp. 16063.

  4. Hileman J. I., Stratton R. W., Alternative jet fuels, Environmental Science &Technology, USA, 2014, pp. 14043-14049.

  5. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), CORSIA: The Carbon Offsettingand Reduction Scheme for International Aviation, ICAO, Canada, 2019.

  6. Zhang X., Myhre G., Kramer L. J., Aviation fuel and climate mitigation pathways:Long-term scenarios, Nature Sustainability, UK, 2022, pp. 125-133.

  7. ASTM International, ASTM D1655 - Standard Specification for Aviation TurbineFuels, ASTM, USA, 2020.

  8. De Jong S., Antonissen K., Hoefnagels R., et al., Life-cycle analysis of greenhousegas emissions from renewable jet fuel production, Biotechnology for Biofuels,Netherlands, 2017, pp. 64. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7

  9. Lobo P., Hagen D. E., Whitefield P. D., Comparison of PM emissions from acommercial jet engine burning conventional, biomass, and Fischer-Tropsch fuels,Environmental Science & Technology, USA, 2015, pp. 4087-4095.

  10. Liu X., Zhang Y., Wang J., Chen P., Advances in biofuel production technologiesfor aviation applications, Renewable Energy, USA, 2022, pp. 203-216.

  11. Yan Q., Wang J., Lin H., Hydroprocessed renewable jet fuels: Production pathwaysand catalytic challenges, Catalysis Today, China, 2022, pp. 65-79.

  12. Cames M., Graichen J., Siemons A., Aviation biofuels: Technology roadmap andpolicy recommendations, Transport Research Part D: Transport and Environment,Germany, 2021, pp. 103088.

  13. Dhar A., Kumar S., Bose P. K., Electrochemical pathways for sustainable jet fuelproduction: Advances and prospects, Energy & Environmental Science, India, 2022, pp.1043-1057.

  14. Arora P., Deshmukh A. G., Catalyst developments in hydroprocessing for renewableaviation fuel production, Fuel Processing Technology, India, 2023, pp. 107170.

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 2

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list