SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

CROP PROTECTION COSTS AND FARMING INTENSITY IN LATVIA

Valda Bratka, Artūrs Prauliņš

First published: 2024-11-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024/5.1/s21.57View metrics

Abstract

Nowadays, sustainability has become the core concept affecting the public perception of economic development and natural resource management all over the world. Although intensification of agricultural practices is typically viewed as a way to achieving and retaining food independence at national and supra-national levels, there are concerns about its potential negative impact on biological diversity, natural habitats, healthy ecosystem and resilience to climate change. As a result, intensive farming might be regarded as unsustainable, damaging and environmentally unfriendly mode of agricultural production. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the trends in intensification of agricultural practices adopted by crop farms of various economic sizes and specialization in Latvia since its accession to the EU in 2004. Our calculations are based on information obtained from SUDAT - a national system of data collection in Latvia that constitutes an integral part of the EU Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Statistical data are adjusted for inflation and input price fluctuations using the price indices of the means of agricultural production. In our analysis, crop protection costs are used as an environmental indicator of natural resource and biodiversity conservation. Results provide evidence of high heterogeneity in farming intensity in Latvia where sustainable crop farming coexists with conventional farming based on intensive production technology.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 3
Dimensions ID: pub.1183084886

Publication details

Title
CROP PROTECTION COSTS AND FARMING INTENSITY IN LATVIA
Authors
Valda Bratka, Artūrs Prauliņš
Proceedings
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2024, Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation, Vol 24, Issue 5.1
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2024
Pages
441-450
SWS Citekey
Bratka202421441450
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603729
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References13
  1. Popp, J., Peto, K., Nagy, J. Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol. 33, pp. 243-255, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-012-0105-x

  2. Antonini, C., Argiles-Bosch, J. M. Productivity and environmental costs from intensification of farming. A panel data analysis across EU regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 140 / issue 2, pp. 796-803, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.009

  3. Swinton, S. M., Van Deynze, B. Hoes to herbicides: Economics of evolving weed management in the United States. European Journal of Development Research, vol. 29, pp. 560-574, 2017. DOI: 10.1057/s41287-017-0077-4

  4. Burger, J., deMol, F., Gerowitt, B. Influence of cropping system factors on pesticide use intensity - a multivariate analysis of on-farm data in Northeast Germany. European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 40, pp. 54-63, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2012.02.008

  5. Popp, J. Cost-benefit analysis of crop protection measures. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, vol. 6 / supplement 1, pp. 105-112, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00003-011-0677-4

  6. Skarzynska, A., Abramczuk, L., Jablonski, K. Impact of growing costs on the profitability of crop production in Poland in the mid-term perspective. Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 17 / issue 1, pp. 119-138, 2016. DOI: 10.5513/jcea01/17.1.1680

  7. Xu, R., Kuang, R., Pay, E., Dou, H., de Snoo, G. R. Factors contributing to overuse of pesticides in western China. Environmental Sciences, vol. 5 / issue 4, pp. 235-249, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/15693430802346543

  8. Zhang, C., Guanming, S., Shen, J., Hu, R. Productivity effect and overuse of pesticide in crop production in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, vol. 14 / issue 9, pp. 1903-1910, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61056-5

  9. Jacquet, F., Butault, J.-P., Guichard, L. An economic analysis of the possibility of reducing pesticides in French field crops. Ecological Economics, vol. 70 / issue 9, pp. 1638-1648, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.003

  10. Barnes, A. P., Thomson, S. G., Measuring progress towards sustainable intensification: How far can secondary data go? Ecological Indicators, vol. 36, pp. 213- 220, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.001

  11. Westbury, D. B., Park, J. R., Mauchline, A. L., Crane, R. T., Mortimer, S. R. Assessing the environmental performance of English arable and livestock holdings using data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Journal of Environment Management, vol. 92 / issue 3, pp. 902-909, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.051

  12. Gerrard, C. L., Padel, S., Moakes, S., The use of Farm Business Survey data to compare the environmental performance of organic and conventional farms. International Journal of Agricultural Management, vol. 2 / issue 1, pp. 5-16, 2012. DOI: 10.5836/ijam/2013-01-02

  13. Uthesa, S. et al. Costs, quantity and toxicity: Comparison of pesticide indicators collected from FADN farms in four EU-countries. Ecological Indicators, vol. 104, pp. 695-703, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.028

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list