Scholarly record
ARSENIC REMOVAL FROM GROUNDWATER BY COAGULATION PROCESS: PERFORMANCE AND LIMITATIONS INFLUENCED BY THE GROUNDWATER SOURCES CHEMISTRY USED FOR DRINKING WATER PURPOSE IN THE WEST REGION OF ROMANIA
Abstract
Arsenic (As) contaminated groundwater is a critical issue of concern, in view of its toxicity through drinking water and health impacts on the human body. In this regard, the World Health Organization (WHO, 1993) has recommended 10 ?g/L for dissolved As concentration in water as standard value for drinking purposes. Special attention should be paid to the monitoring the quality of the groundwater, the chemistry and composition of arsenic-contaminated water are the major factors, determining the applied technologies for removal of arsenic. The coagulation-flocculation process is well known as physico-chemical technique for As removal, which provides high removal efficiency, even at high concentrations of As(V). This method have many advantages: high stability, low cost, simple operation and fast sedimentation. This paper examines the current scenario of arsenic contamination of groundwater in the West Region of Romania, and evaluate the As removal performances and limitation of different coagulants used, their operating conditions, properties, and efficiencies. The coagulation experiments were conducted through the Jar test, which simulates three steps including coagulation, flocculation, and settling. The coagulants tested comparatively were ferric and aluminum-based coagulants, respectively ferric chloride, ferric sulfate, aluminum sulfate and polyaluminum chloride. Better coagulating performance of the ferric salts compared with the aluminum salts has been confirmed due to their higher density of adsorption.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References13
Alarcon-Herrera M.T., Gutierrez M., Geogenic arsenic in groundwater: Challenges, gaps, and future directions, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, vol. 27, pp 100349, 2022; DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100349
Babu D. S., Vijay K., Nidheesh P.V., Kumar M. S., Performance of continuous aerated iron electrocoagulation process for arsenite removal from simulated groundwater and management of arsenic-iron sludge, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 47, pp 101476, 2021; DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101476
Baskan M.B., Pala A., A statistical experiment design approach for arsenic removal by coagulation process using aluminum sulfate, Desalination, vol. 254 (1-3), pp 42-48, 2010; DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.12.016
Kumar R., Patel M., Singh P., Bundschuh J., Pittman Jr. C. U., Trakal L., Mohan D., Emerging technologies for arsenic removal from drinking water in rural and peri-urban areas: Methods, experience from, and options for Latin America, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 694, pp 133427, 2019; DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.233
Nicomel N. R., Leus K., Folens K., Van Der Voort P., Laing G. D., Review-Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Water: Current Status and Future Perspectives, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol.13, pp. 62, 2016; DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13010062
Pacala A., Neidoni D.G., Negrea S.C., Diaconu L.A., Tenea A.G., Dinu C., Stefanescu M., General aspects of the coagulation process for the removal of arsenic from simulated groundwater, Proceedings of 30th International Symposium on Analytical and Environmental Problems, Hungary, ISBN 978-963-688-009-5, pp 146-149, 2024;
Raheja H., Goel A., Pal M., An evaluation of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and irrigation uses under the GIS framework, Water Practice & Technology, vol. 00, /issue 0, 1, DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2022.134, 2022;
Shafiquzzaman Md., Hasan Md. M., Haider H., Bari Quazi H., Ghoul Y.E., Nakajima J., Evaluating configuration of dual unit ceramic filter for arsenic removal from highly contaminated groundwater, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 319, pp 115664, 2022; DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115664
Singh R., Singh S., Parihar P., Singh V.P., Prasad S.M., Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: A review, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 112, pp 247�270, 2015; DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.10.009
Order 621/07.07.2014 regarding the approval of the threshold values for ground-water in Romania, Official Monitor 535/18.07.2014, Romania, 2014;
Ordinance 7/18.01.2023 regarding the quality of water intended for human con-sumption, Official Monitor 63/25.01.2023, Romania, 2023;
Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12.12.2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration, 2014;
Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition Incorporating the first and second addenda. Chemical fact sheets: Arsenic, World Health Organization, 2022;
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

