Scholarly record
GEOTECHNICAL RISK ASSESSMENT VIA EXPERT POLLING METHOD ON THE STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION WORKS
Abstract
Stage of construction works is responsible for the most part of risks, emerging during construction project. Violation of technologies of construction works, unsatisfactory quality of construction materials leads to additional costs of an amount equal to the cost of alteration of works. Each violation on the construction site on itself leads to insignificant damage, however, their frequency and complication at further stages entails a much larger aggregate damage. ThatпїЅs why qualified construction management personnel plays a key role in ensuring the reliability of the structure. Efficiency of construction management personnel can be significantly enhanced by implementation of well-designed system for identification, analysis and elimination of technological risks and their factors on the site. Expert polling method implies collection of information about risks by using personal experience of people, professionally involved in related field. This method is used in cases, where there is a high degree of uncertainty and lack of statistical data. Implementation of this method is justified, as construction works are tied with high level of uncertainty and information about risk occurrence often does not reach official statistical records.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References13
SP 22.13330.2011 Osnovaniya zdaniy i sooruzheniy. Aktualizirovannaya redaktsiya SNiP 2.02.01-83* [Design and construction specifications 22.13330.2011 Foundations of buildings and structures. Updated version of SNiP 2.02.01-83*]
GOST R ISO/MEK 31010—2011 “Menedzhment Riska. Metody upravleniya riskom” [GOST R ISO / IEC 31010-2011 “Risk management. Risk Management Methods”]
Bugrova S.M., Guk N.M. Risk-menedzhment: Uchebnoye posobiye [Risk Management: Textbook]. Kemerovo Technological Institute of Food Industry. Kemerovo, 2005. - 132 p. ISBN-5-89289-327-8
Dubrov A.M., Lagosha B.A., Khrustalev E.Yu., Baranskaya Т.P. Modelirovaniye riskovykh situatsiy v ekonomike i biznese: ucheb. posobiye [Modeling of risk situations in economy and business: textbook.] Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 2001.
Beshelev S.D., Gurvich F.G. Matematiko-statisticheskiye metody ekspertnykh otsenok. [Mathematic-statistical methods of expert evaluations.] Moscow, Statistika, 1980.
Nefedova T. Kolichestvennaya otsenka riskov kak kriteriy ustoychivogo razvitiya predpriyatiy [Nefedova T. Kolichestvennaya otsenka riskov kak kriteriy ustoychivogo razvitiya predpriyatiy] TDR. 2010. №11 pp. 39-41
Granaturov V.M. Ekonomicheskiy risk: sushchnost', metody izmereniya, puti snizheniya. [Economic risk: the essence, methods of measurement, ways to reduce.] Moscow, Atlas, 1996.
Mel'chakov A.P. Raschet i otsenka riska avarii i bezopasnogo resursa stroitel'nykh ob"yektov. (Teoriya, metodiki i inzhenernyye prilozheniya): Uchebnoye posobiye. [Calculation and assessment of the risk of an accident and the safe resource of building objects. (Theory, techniques and engineering applications): Textbook] Chelyabinsk, Izdatel'stvo YUUrGU, 2006. – 49 p.
Tamrazyan A.G. K zadacham monitoringa riska zdaniy i sooruzheniy [To the tasks of monitoring the risk of buildings and structures] Stroitel'nyye materialy, oborudovaniye, tekhnologii XXI veka №3, 2013
Chunyuk D.YU. Otsenka i upravleniye riskami pri stroitel'stve podzemnykh sooruzheniy otkrytym sposobom. [Assessment and management of risks in the construction of underground structures by the open method] – Vestnik MGSU №3, 2009. p.120-124.
Chunyuk D.Yu. Osobennosti klassifikatsii i sostavlyayushchiye geotekhnicheskogo riska v stroitel'stve [Features of classification and components of geotechnical risk in construction] – Promyshlennoye i grazhdanskoye stroitel'stvo. 2013. №9. pp. 42-44
Chunyuk D.YU. Strategiya upravleniya geotekhnicheskim riskom. [Strategy of geotechnical risk management] Vestnik MGSU.2011. №5. p.151-154
Serova Ye.A., Chunyuk D.Yu. Kachestvennyy i kolichestvennyy podkhody pri analize geotekhnicheskogo riska. [Qualitative and quantitative approaches in the analysis of geotechnical risk.] - Vestnik MGSU. 2010. IV-2 p.164-168.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
