SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

ARCHITECTURAL REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN TOOL BASED ON ZACHMAN FRAMEWORK

Alexander Belikov

First published: 2019-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/2.1/s07.014View metrics

Abstract

According to statistical studies, a large number of IT projects end in failure. One of the rea-sons is the complexity of transferring the originally inherent meaning into the system. As you know, any project should be implemented and should be understood by the performer. According to researchers, the cause of the current situation is the inconsistency of the form (meaning) of the target system, which arises due to a misunderstanding between the actors involved in the development at different life cycle stages. This problem arises because of the inconsistency of the forms (artifacts: project document, specification or model) used by the specialists to represent the system (meaning). In this case, the meaning is understood as the collection of artifacts and the process of their obtaining. Existing implementations on the development of the system form or meaning relate to the field of architectural design. Analysis of existing approaches to architectural design shows that the basis of the approaches is the notion of the ?final result? in the form of an artifact. And the meaning that is formed inside the specialists (the process of receiving, i.e. design) is not displayed in any form. Consequently, a problem arises, which consists in disunity and the following differences in the goals and forms of meaning representation among different groups (domain experts, system analysts, developers, etc.) involved in the project and the emergence of so-called ?misunderstanding gaps?. The article proposes solutions to the indicated problems by incorporating into the existing architecture models the tools for creating (the design process) artifacts. To test the results, the proposed structure of artifact creation tools was applied to the Zach-man model. The result is a methodologically interconnected architecture model. Based on the results obtained, an assessment of the meaning mapping is made in the resulting model.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
ARCHITECTURAL REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN TOOL BASED ON ZACHMAN FRAMEWORK
Authors
Alexander Belikov
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2019, Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
107-114
SWS Citekey
Belikov20197107114
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-79-9
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References10
  1. Standish Group 2015 Chaos Report – Q&A with Jennifer Lynch, URL: https://www.infoq.com/articles/standish-chaos-2015

  2. Schooley, B. L., Feldman, S. S., & Alnosayan, N. S. (2011). Development of a Disability Employment Information System: An Information Systems Design Theory Approach // System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on, 1-10.

  3. Herre H. General Formal Ontology (GFO): A Foundational Ontology for Conceptual Modelling. In: Poli R., Healy M., Kameas A. (eds) // Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications. Springer, Dordrecht (2010).

  4. Sally W. Aboelela, Elaine Larson, Suzanne Bakken, Olveen Carrasquillo, Allan Formicola, Sherry A. Glied, Janet Haas, Kristine M. Gebbie Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature // Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb; 42(1 Pt 1): 329–346.

  5. Belikov A.N., Rogozov Y.I., Shevchenko O.V. Synthesis of the life cycle stages of information systems development // Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2019. Т. 763. С. 331-337.

  6. Belikova S.A., Rogozov Y.I., Sviridov A.S. Method of user interface design based on semantic approach. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2019. V. 763. pp. 311-318.

  7. Kruchten, P.B.: The 4+ 1 view model of architecture. IEEE softw. 12(6), 42–50 (1995)

  8. Mrdalj, S., Jovanovic, V.: Mapping the UML to the Zachman framework. In: AMCIS 2005 Proceedings, p. 315 (2005)

  9. Krzysztof Kluza, Piotr Wi´sniewski, Antoni Ligeza, Anna Suchenia,and Joanna Wyrobek Knowledge Representation in Model Driven Approach in Terms of the Zachman Framework // ICAISC 2018, LNAI 10842, pp. 689–699, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91262-2_60

  10. Feglar, T., Levy, J.K., Feglar, T. et al. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. (2006) 15: 141. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-006-5003-9

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database