SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

CONCEPT FOR IMPLEMENTING INTERDISCIPLINARY INTEGRATION IN THE TEACHING OF GEOGRAPHY AND HISTORY IN BULGARIAN SCHOOLS

Maya Vasileva

First published: 2025-08-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2025/5.1/s21.094View metrics

Abstract

The relevance of interdisciplinary integration and the application of an interdisciplinary approach in the contemporary educational context is driven by the need to develop and enhance key competencies among students. This necessity also stems from the fact that the formation of critical thinking and creative problem-solving skills is inherently linked to the establishment of causal relationships across different fields of knowledge. Knowledge and skills acquired in isolation within individual disciplines and subjects often do not meet the modern demands of a globalized society. In this regard, education that is based on interdisciplinary integration and addresses complex, real-world problems encourages the development of a holistic understanding of the world in students. The rationale for seeking interdisciplinary integration, particularly between geography and history, is both regulatory and content-based. The interdisciplinary approach has even been recognized as a -key tool for modernizing the national educational system.- In this context, the present study proposes a conceptual model for implementing interdisciplinary integration in the teaching of geography and history in Bulgaria. This model is constructed based on an empirical study conducted in a real educational setting, following a pre-developed methodological framework. The constructed concept is presented in three dimensions: normative, content-related, and technological. These three dimensions address three essential questions: why the subject matter will be taught (based on socially significant expected outcomes), what will be taught (in terms of educational content), and how it will be taught (within the context of a cognitive and activity-based learning construct). All three dimensions are central to the preparation of both teachers and students. The results of the study confirm the applicability of the model in the practice of secondary education in Bulgaria and provide a solid foundation for future research on the subject.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 6
Dimensions ID: pub.1195348636

Publication details

Title
CONCEPT FOR IMPLEMENTING INTERDISCIPLINARY INTEGRATION IN THE TEACHING OF GEOGRAPHY AND HISTORY IN BULGARIAN SCHOOLS
Authors
Maya Vasileva
Proceedings
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM2025, Ecology, Environmental Economics, Education, and Legislation, Vol25, Issue 5.1.
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2025
Pages
743-750
SWS Citekey
Vasileva202521743750
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603859
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References10
  1. Alberta Education Guide., Primary Programs Framework-Curriculum Integration: Making Connections. Alberta, Canada: Alberta Education. 2007, https://education.alberta.ca/media/563581/guidingprinc_curr2007.pdf

  2. Fogarty, R., Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership 49: 1991. pp 61�65. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_199110_fogarty.pdf

  3. ??????, ?. ?., ????????????? ????? ? ?????? ? ???????? ???????????? ???????????. � ????????????? ???????? ? ??????? ???????????? ???????????: ????????? ????????????? ??????-???????????? ???????????. ?????-???????: ??? �??????-?????�, 1999, pp 27�29. ISSN 2311-1305 https://science.cfuv.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/vyp-56-p-9-2017.pdf

  4. Harden, R. M. The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. � Medical Education 34: 2000. pp 551�557. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00697.x

  5. Jones, C., Interdisciplinary Approach � Advantages, Disadvantages, and the Future Benefits of Interdisciplinary Studies. � ESSAI: Vol. 7, Article 26. 2009

  6. ?????, ?., ????????????? ????? ???????????????? ? ??????????????????? ??- ????????? ??? ???????? ???????????? ???????? ?????????????, 2007, disserCat http://www.dissercat.com/

  7. ?????, ?. ?., ????????????? ????? ??? ????????????? ?????? ??? ???????????? ?????????????????? ??????????, 2012, https://superinf.ru/view

  8. Lederman, N. G., M. L. Niess., Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics? � School Science and Mathematics, 97 (2), pp 57�58.1997 DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17342.x

  9. ???????, ?. ?????????????? ?????????? ? ???????? ???????. ?? �??. ??. ???????�. ?????. ISBN 978-954-07-4679-1. 2019

  10. Venville, G. J., V. M. Dawson., The art of teaching primary science. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin Publishers. 2004. DOI: 10.4324/9781003114871

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list