SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

DRIVERS AND MODERATING FACTORS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND INVOLVEMENT

Vanya Kraleva, Svilen Ivanov

First published: 2020-09-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/5.2/s21.020View metrics

Abstract

The paper aims at analysing the effect of different motivational drivers and moderating factors to the activation of sustainable behaviour in its two main forms ? consumption and involvement. Further it aims at testing the relationship between activism and the choice and usage of products in a sustainable manner. To fulfil these tasks a theoretical model is designed on the basis of previous quantitative and qualitative research on the antecedents of sustainable behaviour. The research builds on a survey with a sample of 212 participants from Bulgaria with a different background. To analyse data there were used hypothesis testing and regression analysis. The results from the study confirm the moderating effect of locus of control and self-efficacy emphasized in literature and provide evidence for the relation between sustainable behaviour and activism. The findings, however, reveal also that behaviour, often categorized as sustainable (the triad reuse-reduce-recycle and active citizenship) is predominantly driven by factors other than the typical eco-centric values. These conclusions point on the need for rethinking how sustainable behaviour can be activated and can guide policy makers in designing a system of measures to help the transition to sustainable development. The results from this study can also assist responsible companies in building strategies for growing the segment of sustainable consumers and can be used to help further research on the relationship between sustainable consumption and involvement to track cross-national differences on similar markets.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 2
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 5

Publication details

Title
DRIVERS AND MODERATING FACTORS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND INVOLVEMENT
Authors
Vanya Kraleva, Svilen Ivanov
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2020, Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2020
Pages
169-176
SWS Citekey
Kraleva202021169176
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-11-8
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. United Nations. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/Res/70/1, 2015.

  2. Linnenluecke, M. K., Verreynne, M.-L., de Villiers Scheepers, M. J., & Venter, C. A review of collaborative planning approaches for transformative change towards a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, Part 4, 3212-3224, 2017.

  3. Sharma, R., & Jha, M. Values influencing sustainable consumption behaviour: Exploring the contextual relationship. Journal of Business Research, 76, 77-88, 2017.

  4. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. The "New Environmental Paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, Vol. 9, pp. 10-19, 1978.

  5. Akenji, L., & Chen, H. A Framework for Shaping Sustainable Lifeslyles: UNEP, 2006.

  6. Emerich, M. LOHAS means business. Lohas Journal, 2000.

  7. Brochado, A., Teiga, N. & Oliveira-Brochado, F. The ecological conscious consumer behaviour: are the activists different? International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 41, 2, pp. 138-146, 2017.

  8. Foxall, G. The behavioral perspective model of purchase and consumption: From consumer theory to marketing practice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20. 189-198, 1992.

  9. Gregory-Smith D., Smith, A., & Winklhofer, H. Emotions and dissonance in ‘ethical’ consumption choices. Journal of Mar- keting Management. Volume 29, Issue 11-12, pp. 1201-1223, 2013.

  10. Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing, 24(8), 723–742, 2007.

  11. Antonetti, P., Maklan, S. Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices. Journal of Business Ethics, 124:117-134, 2014.

  12. Ajzen, I. Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683, 2002.

  13. Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control: Worth Publishers, 1997.

  14. Chiang, Y, Fang, W., Kaplan, U. & Ng. E. Locus of Control: The Mediation Effect between Emotional Stability and Pro-Environmental Behavior. Sustainability, 11, 820, 2019.

  15. Fogg, B. A Behavior Model for Persuasive Design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Persuasive '09. New York, NY, 2009.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list