SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

NATURAL RESOURCE SIGNIFICANCE IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN LATVIA: THE FIVE-YEAR PERSPECTIVE

Zane Vītoliņa

First published: 2023-10-01https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023/5.1/s21.53View metrics

Abstract

In the previous research by author conducted in 2016 [1], the indicators characterizing natural resources in Latvian rural municipalities were analysed, looking for connections with the overall territorial development and growth. The study concluded that there are significant differences in the development of municipalities, using the complex territorial development index (TDI) and analysing the available natural resources, such as forests, agricultural land areas, receiving EU funding, etc. The municipalities with the highest TDI values did not have significant natural resources. Their development was mainly determined by their location - close to the capital Riga, which is the largest economic centre in Latvia, thus forming a distinctly monocentric spatial structure. The positions of the Latvian government regarding regional policy, which are included in the National Development Plan 2021-2027, are oriented towards the promotion of polycentrism, thus forming the basis for sustainable and balanced development of all territories. Policy makers point out that the fact that growth has not been territorially balanced, as inequality is still high and the growth of remote regions lags behind the Riga region, creates significant long-term risks. This study analyses whether there have been changes in the five-year period, both in terms of the overall territorial development of rural municipalities, as well as in evaluating the changes in natural resource indicators, raising the issue of the effective use of natural resources.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 4

Publication details

Title
NATURAL RESOURCE SIGNIFICANCE IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN LATVIA: THE FIVE-YEAR PERSPECTIVE
Authors
Zane Vītoliņa
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference- EXPO Proceedings; 23rd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2023, Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation, Vol. 23, Issue 5.1
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2023
Pages
411-420
SWS Citekey
Vitolina202321411420
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-60-6
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References12
  1. Bulderberga Z., Rivza B, Natural resource significance in rural development evaluation: the case of Latvia, 16th International multidisciplinary scientific GeoConference SGEM 2016: conference proceedings, Bulgaria, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Book 5: Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation, Vol. 3: Environmental economics. Education and accreditation in geosciences, p. 373-380. 2016. DOI: 10.5593/SGEM2016/B53/S21.048

  2. Clotteau M., Policy Guidelines for Sustainable Mobility in Rural and Mountain Areas. 40p. OECD. 2014

  3. OECD. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide; OECD, European Union and Joint Research Centre - European Commission 162 p., 2008.

  4. Karnitis, E.; Bicevskis, J.; Karnitis, G. Measuring the Implementation of the Agenda 2030 Vision in Its Comprehensive Sense: Methodology and Tool. Energies 2021, 14, 856. DOI: 10.3390/en14040856

  5. UN program Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, United Nations. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. 35 p. 2015.

  6. Wolf, M. J., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., Wendling, Z. A., et al. 2022 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. 2022

  7. Rivza, B., Kruzmetra, M., & Rivza, P. Linear and structural changes in rural space � the positive and problematic aspects (case of Latvia). Open Agriculture. 5 (1), 669�676. DOI: 10.1515/opag-2020-0068., 2020

  8. Central Statistical Bureau. 2023. Available at: https://stat.gov.lv/en/search?Search=%22municipalities%22&DataSource=%22data%22

  9. OECD. Innovation and modernising the rural economy. 2014. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/Innovation-Modernising-Rural- Economy.pdf

  10. EC. A harmonised definition of cities and rural areas: the new degree of urbanization. 2014. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/work/2014_01_new_urban.pdf.

  11. Boisier S. Is there Room for Local Development in a Globalized World? Cepal Review, Vol. 86, pp. 45-60, 2005. DOI: 10.18356/811a95d3-en

  12. Quan, J., Nelson, V. Territory and Rural Development: Concepts, Methods and Approaches (literature review). Land and Territory Research Paper No. 2. p. 50, 2005.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list