SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

COMPARISON OF TWO THERMAL METHODS OF FOR CHICKEN MANURE TREATMENTS

Liliya Biktasheva

First published: 2019-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/4.1/s18.085View metrics

Abstract

Chicken meat is easy to produce, and as a result, it is a cheap and massively used source of animal protein in food. However, poultry farms produce more than 200 thousand tons of chicken manure per year, which must be treated. In the large scale farms biological treatment requires huge facilities and investments, therefore other methods are required. Among them, high-temperature drying and pyrolysis. The goal of this work was to compare the products of chicken manure treatment by means of two thermal methods - high-temperature drying technology (250 ° C, 30 s) with subsequent granulation (IG) and slow pyrolysis (400 ° C, 2h) with subsequent granulation (BG) - according to a number of parameters: the effect on plant growth, reduction of toxicity after treatment (eluate test using Paramecium caudatum and Cereodaphnia affinis), the content of biogenic elements (C, N) in different forms, the presence of pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli, Salmonella spp, Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, Enterococcus spp, Campylobacter jejuni, Clostridium perfringens, Yersinia enterocolitica, Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus cereus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae and the presence of antibiotic-resistant genes. The results obtained were compared with the data received for unprocessed chicken manure (ChM). In all the three variants (soil treated by IG, BG or ChM), the plant chlorophyll content increased by 30?36% as compared with control soil, plant biomass increased by 30?46% as compared with control, the stem and root length did not differ from those of control. During thermal treatment, ecotoxicity decreased in both cases - on average, by 1.1-1.5 for IG and by 2.3-3.3 for BG. High-temperature drying did not lead to significant changes in the pathogenic microorganisms counts estimated by real time PCR with specific primers as compared with initial ChM, while pyrolysis allowed to get rid of all the pathogens. Thus, from the point of view of final product characteristics, slow pyrolysis is a preferable method to thermally treat chicken manures.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 2
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 4
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 12

Publication details

Title
COMPARISON OF TWO THERMAL METHODS OF FOR CHICKEN MANURE TREATMENTS
Authors
Liliya Biktasheva
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2019, Energy and Clean Technologies
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
669-676
SWS Citekey
Biktasheva201918669676
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-83-6
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References0
0references registered for this publication

Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 2

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list