SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

WIND BARRIERS AS A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO PM10 EMISSIONS IN INDUSTRIAL PLANTS

Stefano Carbone, V. De Brito

First published: 2024-11-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024/1.1/s03.53View metrics

Abstract

This paper refers on the outcomes of an experimental study developed in an industrial plant in the centre of Italy in which dust emission represents an important annoyance affecting the whole activity and so requiring to be managed in order to guarantee legal compliance but, above all, a safe workplace. This case study consists in the assessment of the efficacy of different reduction measures designed to avoid and, where not possible, to reduce dust emissions from stockpiles. According to a monitoring campaign based on field sampled data, these areas were identified as the most pollutant sources in the plant itself and many solutions were taken into consideration to reduce the emission due to wind erosion. Under these conditions wind fences represent a significant solution to be tested in addition to usual measures which are usually installed. In particular some simulations are performed in order to define the variation of wind velocity all around the stockpile and so to select and design the best solution and configuration to reduce the emission of fugitive dust from stockpiles when caused by wind erosion.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 1
Dimensions ID: pub.1183084649

Publication details

Title
WIND BARRIERS AS A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO PM10 EMISSIONS IN INDUSTRIAL PLANTS
Authors
Stefano Carbone, V. De Brito
Proceedings
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2024, Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration And Mining, Vol 24, Issue 1.1
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2024
Pages
407-414
SWS Citekey
Carbone20243407414
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603675
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References11
  1. Vella, J.A., Camilleri, R.,. Fine dust emissions from softstone quarrying in Malta. Xjenza. 10. pp. 47-54. 2005.

  2. Tartakovsky D. Stern E, Broday D.M, Dispersion of TSP and PM10 emissions from quarries in complex terrain, 2016, Science of the Total Environment, 542, pp. 946-954, 2016; DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.133.

  3. Alfaro Degan, G., Di Bona, G., Lippiello D., Pinzari M. �PM10 dispersion model in quarrying activities, a comparison of an ISC3 approach to a mono/multivariate geostatistical estimation�. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 86, 2006, ISSN 1743-3541, pp. 111-120, DOI: 10.2495/AIR06012.

  4. Alfaro Degan, G., Lippiello, D., Pinzari, M. Effectiveness of airborne dust control strategies in opencast quarrying activities: A case study near Rome. GEAM Geoingegneria Ambientale e Mineraria 139 (2), pp. 5 � 12, 2013, ISSN 1121-9041.

  5. Roney, J.A.; White, B.R. Estimating fugitive dust emission rates using an environmental boundary layer wind tunnel. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 7668�7685. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.015

  6. Torshizi, M. R., Miri, A., Shahriari, A., Dong, Z., & Davidson-Arnott, R. The effectiveness of a multi-row Tamarix windbreak in reducing aeolian erosion and sediment flux, Niatak area, Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 110486. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110486

  7. Qiu, Y., Yuan, Y., Yu, R., & Liu, J. (2022). Aerodynamic shape optimization of porous fences with curved deflectors using surrogate modelling. Optimization and Engineering. DOI: 10.1007/s11081-022-09777-6.

  8. Alghamdi, A. A., & Al-Kahtani, N. S. (2005). Sand Control Measures and Sand Drift Fences. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 19(4), 295�299. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:4(295). )

  9. Dong, Z., Qian, G., Luo, W., & Wang, H. (2006). Threshold velocity for wind erosion: The effects of porous fences. Environmental Geology, 51(3), 471�475. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-006-0343-9.

  10. Bruno, L., Fransos, D., & Lo Giudice, A. (2018). Solid barriers for windblown sand mitigation: Aerodynamic behavior and conceptual design guidelines. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 173, 79�90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.005

  11. Alfaro Degan G, Lippiello D, Pinzari M (2015). A comparison between methods for assessment of whole-body vibration exposure: A case study in a limestone quarry. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 8 (1), p. 90-97, 2018. ISSN: 2041-904X, DOI: 10.2495/SAFE-V8-N1-90-97.

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 1

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list