SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF FOREST

Nodar Khujadze, Lia Matchavarian

First published: 2024-11-01https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024/3.1/s14.40View metrics

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate carbon storage dynamics in pure pine, oak, and mixed forests within a one-hectare area. Tree samples were collected to measure their weight, size, and density. Each type of forest was estimated how much carbon is hold per hectare. The findings revealed significant differences in carbon storage capacities among them. Pure oak forests emerged as the top carbon reservoirs, with 57% of their trees' mass comprising carbon. Pure pine forests followed closely with 51% carbon storage. Interestingly, mixed forests, hosting both pine and oak trees, exhibited a considerable carbon storage potential of about 53%. This finding highlights the ecological advantages of mixed forests over pure ones. Mixed forests stand out for their biodiversity, benefiting from the complementary strengths of multiple tree species. While oak trees tend to store more carbon in their dense wood, pine trees excel in capturing carbon through their rapid growth and expansive root systems. This diverse composition creates a synergistic effect, enhancing carbon capture and storage capabilities within mixed forests. The superiority of mixed forests in carbon storage has significant implications for forest management and climate change mitigation efforts. Protecting and promoting mixed forests can maximize carbon sequestration potential while fostering resilient and sustainable ecosystems. Recognizing the value of mixed forests, policymakers, conservationists, and land managers can prioritize conservation efforts and implement strategies to safeguard these invaluable carbon sinks. In summary, this research highlights the significance of forest composition in carbon storage dynamics. By emphasizing the ecological benefits of mixed forests over pure ones, our study contributes to informed decision-making and sustainable forest management practices aimed at preserving and enhancing carbon sequestration in natural landscapes.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 4
Dimensions ID: pub.1183084761

Publication details

Title
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF FOREST
Authors
Nodar Khujadze, Lia Matchavarian
Proceedings
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2024, Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems, Vol 24, Issue 3.1
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2024
Pages
339-346
SWS Citekey
Khujadze202414339346
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603705
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References19
  1. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis � The Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Switzerland, pp 27, 2013.

  2. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Sixteenth Session, Held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010, Framework Convention on Climate Change, Cancun, Mexico, 2010.

  3. Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Climate Change Conference, Paris, pp 33, 2015.

  4. Barrett S. Climate treaties and approaching catastrophes, J. Environ. Econ. Management 66, pp 235-250, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2012.12.004

  5. Gibson R., Habib M.A., Ziegler A. Reinsurance securitization: the case of natural catastrophe risk, J. Math. Econ. 53, pp 79-100, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.05.007

  6. Arora V., Montenegro, A. Small temperature benefits provided by realistic afforestation efforts. Nature Geosci., 4, pp 514-518, 2011. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1182

  7. Pretzsch H., Schutze G. Tree species mixing can increase stand productivity, density, and growth efficiency and attenuate the tradeoff between density and growth throughout the whole rotation. Annals of Botany, 2021. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcab077

  8. Rodriguez de Prado D., Vazquez Veloso A., Quian Y.F., Ruano I., Bravo F., Herrero de Aza C. Can mixed forests sequester more CO2 than pure forests in future climate scenarios? A case study of Pinus sylvestris combinations in Spain. Europian Journal of Forest Research, Springer. Vol. 142(1), pp 91-105, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s10342-022-01507-y

  9. Chomel M., Desrochers A., Baldy V., Guittonny M., Gauquelin T. Non-additive effects of mixing hybrid poplar and white spruce on aboveground and soil carbon storage in boreal plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 328, pp 292-299, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.048

  10. Giberti G.S., Wellstein C., Giovannelli A., Bielak K., Uhl E., Aguirre-Raquira W., Giammarchi F., Tonon G. Annual carbon sequestration patterns in trees: A case study from scots pine monospecific stands and mixed stands with sessile oak in central Poland. Forests, 13(4), p.582, 2022 DOI: 10.3390/f13040582

  11. Google earth V 7,3. (December 1, 2020). Akhaltsikhe, Georgia. 41� 36� 30.31� N, 42� 58� 43.57� W, Eye alt 1000 feet. Maxar technologies 2024, CNES/Airbus 2024. http://www.earth.google.com [April 26, 2024] .

  12. Chave J., Sabatier U.P. Measuring wood density for tropical forest trees, 2006.

  13. Bettinger P., Boston K., Siry J., Grebner D. Forest Management and Planning: Second Edition, pp 21-63, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809476-1.00002-3

  14. Leverett R.T. Rejuvenated White Pine Lists and Volume Modeling. November 11, 2008.

  15. Guttler B., Bettin H., Brown R., Davis R., Mester Z., Milton M., Pramann A., Rienitz O., Vocke R., Wielgosz R. Amount of substance and the mole in the SI. Metrologia, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1681-7575/ab1fae

  16. Kleinn C., Traub B., Hoffmann C. A note on the slope correction and the estimation of the length of line features. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32(4), pp 751-756, 2002. DOI: 10.1139/x02-004

  17. Vachnadze G.S., Tiginashvili Z.T., Tsereteli G.V., Aptsiauri, B.N., Nishnianidze Q.G. Carbon stock sequestered from the atmosphere by coniferous forests of Eastern Georgia in conditions of global warming. Annals of Agrarian Science, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.aasci.2016.05.014

  18. Vachnadze G., Tiginashvili Z., Tsereteli G., Aptsiauri B., Basilidze L. Carbon Stock Sequestered in the phytocenosis of oak forests in Georgia. Annals of Agrarian Science, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.aasci.2018.05.002

  19. Holtmann A., Huth A., Pohl F., Rebmann C., Fischer R. Carbon sequestration in mixed deciduous forests: The influence of tree size and species composition derived from model experiments. Forests, 12(6), 726, 2021 DOI: 10.3390/f12060726

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list