SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

CICER ARIETINUM L. AS A CLIMATE-RESILIENT ALTERNATIVE TO PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L. IN SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE

Ioana-Alina HÎNDA, Georgeta Pop, Simona Nita, Ilinca-Merima Imbrea, Denisa-Cristiana Hetea

First published: 2025-12-27https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2025v/4.2/s19.52View metrics

Abstract

Climate change and increasing drought frequency pose major risks to legume production in Southeastern Europe, threatening food security and sustainable land use. This study evaluates chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as a climate-resilient alternative to common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under the pedoclimatic conditions of Southwestern Romania. A bifactorial field experiment (species - preceding crop) was conducted in 2023 (favorable year) and 2024 (drought year). Results showed that chickpea maintained significantly higher yield stability (average 1205 kg ha?-) than common bean (961 kg ha?-), with yield reductions under drought of only 15-20% compared to over 45% for bean. Although protein content was similar, protein yield was higher in chickpea due to its stable productivity. Wider row spacing (50-70 cm) improved performance in both species. Beyond agronomic advantages, chickpea enhances soil fertility through biological nitrogen fixation and supports biodiversity and carbon sequestration. These findings highlight chickpea-s potential to strengthen climate resilience, improve crop rotation sustainability, and align local farming practices with European Green Deal objectives.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.
Dimensions ID: pub.1199508362

Publication details

Title
CICER ARIETINUM L. AS A CLIMATE-RESILIENT ALTERNATIVE TO PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L. IN SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE
Authors
Ioana-Alina HÎNDA, Georgeta Pop, Simona Nita, Ilinca-Merima Imbrea, Denisa-Cristiana Hetea
Proceedings
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2025, Energy and Clean Technologies
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2025
Pages
485-490
SWS Citekey
Hinda202519485490
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603934
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References17
  1. Arif, A., et al. (2021). A comparative study for assessing the drought-tolerance of chickpea genotypes under field conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 607869. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.607869

  2. Asati, R., et al. (2022). Molecular breeding and drought tolerance in chickpea. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1015403. DOI: 10.3390/life12111846

  3. del-Canto, A., et al. (2023). Selected indigenous drought-tolerant rhizobium strains enhance common bean performance under drought. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1046397. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1046397

  4. Galan, P. M., et al. (2023). Assessment of the geographic origin of Romanian common beans by seed morphometry. Agronomy, 13(11), 2820. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13112820

  5. Koul, B., et al. (2024). Yield of chickpea genotypes as a function of row spacing: A review and recent evidence. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 210(11), 1�12.

  6. Labastida, D., et al. (2023). Dissecting the genetic basis of drought responses in common bean. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1270167. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1143873

  7. Lago-Olveira, S., et al. (2023). Environmental and economic benefits of wheat�chickpea rotations in Mediterranean systems. Science of the Total Environment, 903, 166080. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165124

  8. Negussu, M., et al. (2023). Drought tolerance mechanisms in chickpea: Recent advances and future prospects. Plant Science, 330, 111651.

  9. Ouji, A., et al. (2021). Effect of row spacing and seed rate on Ascochyta blight incidence and yield of chickpea. Tunisian Journal of Plant Protection, 16(1), 9�20. DOI: 10.18805/lr-627

  10. Shi, C., et al. (2024). Effects of different preceding crops on soil nutrients and subsequent crop performance: A review. Plants, 13(9), 1221.

  11. Tay, K., et al. (2025). Screening terminal drought tolerance in dry common bean under contrasting water regimes. Agronomy, 15(7), 1499. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy15071499

  12. Tzemi, D., et al. (2024). The introduction of legume-based crop rotations: Agronomic and environmental gains. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 22(4), 555�572. DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2024.2335085

  13. Wang, Z., et al. (2025). Immediate and second-year effects of preceding crops on subsequent wheat performance. Crop Science, 65(3), 1234�1249. DOI: 10.1002/csc2.70047

  14. Zhang, L., et al. (2025). Legume-based rotation benefits crop productivity and energy efficiency: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 318, 109216.

  15. Zhou, Y., et al. (2023). Intercropping chickpea with flax enhances yield and disease management. Agronomy Journal, 115(6), 3504�3519. DOI: 10.1002/agj2.21280

  16. Singh, R. N., et al. (2025). Optimizing chickpea yield prediction under wilt disease using machine learning. Scientific Reports, 15, 15234. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87134-0

  17. Basavaraj, P. S., et al. (2025). Index-based selection of chickpea for drought tolerance under field conditions. Scientific Reports, 15, 12456. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93273-1

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list