Scholarly record
AN ANALYSIS OF ENERGY AND FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIOR OF HYDROSTATIC TRANSMISSIONS
Abstract
Hydrostatic transmissions create compliance between rigid functional parameters of a power-machine, e.g. an electric motor, and flexible functional parameters of the work machine, e.g. a crane hoist. Hydrostatic transmissions equip fixed or mobile machinery and guidance systems for: aviation, artillery, wind turbines, hydraulic turbine blades, etc. Any hydrostatic transmission includes at least two positive displacement machines: a pump, called transmission пїЅprimaryпїЅ and a motor, called transmission пїЅsecondaryпїЅ. Hydrostatic transmissions with fixed-displacement pumps and motors are ineffectual as regards energy consumption; primary control (pump displacement control), secondary control (motor displacement control) and mixed control (pump and motor displacement control) improve energy efficiency of hydrostatic transmissions. Mixed control is the most energy-efficient; it requires finding solutions to simultaneously achieve reduction of: - speed variation at the positive displacement motor in the secondary, depending on its load variation; - flow discharged through the safety valve of the pump in the primary, main cause for dissipation of hydraulic energy into heat. An experimental model of a hydrostatic transmission has been optimized as regards energy and functionality; it allowed for primary, secondary or mixed control, through the next two solutions: - for secondary control: the solution of introducing an electronic PID (Proportional Integrative Derivative) controller in the motor speed control loop; - for mixed control: the solution of equipping the pump with pressure regulator and introducing an electronic P (proportional) controller in the motor speed control loop. The analysis performed used as methods mathematical modeling and numerical simulation in AMESim. Results showed: - for secondary control: reduction of about 50% in hydraulic motor speed variation, depending on its load variation, when using the PID controller, against using the P controller; - for mixed control: cancellation of flow conveying through the pump safety valve, if the pump in the primary is equipped with pressure regulator, against transmission with secondary control. There has been achieved a case of hydrostatic transmission control with energy and functional optimal behavior, based on displacement control in both positive displacement machines: it was when the pump was equipped with pressure regulator and a P type electronic controller was introduced in the positive displacement motor speed control loop.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References0
Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

