SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PREFERENCE IN PURCHASING DECISIONS OF HEALTHCARE INSTITUTIONS

O. Ozyaral, O. Yarar, A. Tukel

First published: 2009DOI pendingView metrics

Abstract

Biggest challenge experienced by hospitals in 21st century is integrating social values into business operations. Corporate Social Responsibility is a term used for determining responsibility of a healthcare institute whereby the institute not only takes financial economic dimension in decision-making process, but it also considers social and environmental consequences.1 Healthcare institutions are required to invest socially responsible manner; this term is related with use of money in accordance with social and ethical targets. Consequently, healthcare institutions should be socially responsible not only from shareholders and employees, but also from all parties including future generations affected from operations of the institution. In a study where potential risks for healthcare institutions are investigated, corporate social responsibility level and extent of environmental sensitivity in decision-making for purchasing a good or service were revealed as a significant assessment for consumers and employees of company2. Considering healthcare institutions, strategies taking environmental and social aspects into account for purchasing decisions should be implemented and the institutions neglecting those strategies should be exposed to financial, legal and reputation risks due to their anti-environmental acts. At initiation phase for implementing environmentally preferable purchasing in healthcare institutions, policies and procedures compatible with environment should be incorporated. Individual who will ensure that those policies are followed and how they will be held responsible (for example, regular reporting) should be determined in writing monitoring those policies and how those individuals will be considered and thus, an audit process should be developed where concurrent performance will be regularly reviewed. However, it is obvious that training requirement healthcare personnel responsible from purchasing services on environmentalist policies should be fulfilled. Training is critical part of implementation. In this study, integration of social values into purchasing activities by healthcare institutions, which should be a model in terms of social responsibility and environmental conscience, is evaluated and modest recommendations on this issue are developed.

Publication details

Title
USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PREFERENCE IN PURCHASING DECISIONS OF HEALTHCARE INSTITUTIONS
Authors
O. Ozyaral, O. Yarar, A. Tukel
Proceedings
9th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2009
Publisher
SGEM Scientific GeoConference
Year
2009
Pages
785-790
ISSN
Not available yet
ISBN
954-91818-1-2
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References25
  1. PJC, Corporate responsibility: Managing risk a

  2. ADL, Arthur D Little Ltd, The Business Case

  3. 2003, Cambridge

  4. DesJardins, J. (1998). Corporate environme

  5. Ethics, 17(8),

  6. 825. Retrieved February 4, 2006,

  7. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2000). Corp performance: Correlation or misspecification?

  8. 603. Retrieved February 4, 2006 from ProQues Adrian Henriques, ‘Ten things you always wan to ask); Part One: A brief history of corporate social res

  9. Magazine, May 26, 2003, http://www.ethicalco R. Edward Freeman & Jeanne Liedtka’s Cor Approach- Corporate Social Responsibility no

  10. Horizons, July- August 1991, as retrieved on 25

  11. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2000). Corp performance: Correlation or misspecification?

  12. 603. Retrieved February 4, 2006 from ProQues

  13. Aupperle, K, Carroll, A and Hatfield, J 19 relationship between corporate social responsi Management Journal, Volume 28, no 2, June, p Environmental Economics comotive organizations, are subject to the duty ial responsibility. Basic target of a corporate is to carry the company to the highest level of al decisions similar to above mentioned ones plications similar to above mentioned ones in y regards those social responsibilities, ethical icant long-term financial profits. role model for community, are subject to the with social responsibility. Principle target of a ial profit for carrying company to the top level ethical and moral decisions should be made h purchasing phase, as mentioned above. This

  14. -term financial profit for those companies. risk and creating value, Jun 2006, Canberra. Case for Corporate Responsibility, December onmental responsibility. Journal of Business

  15. 2006, from ProQuest database. Corporate social responsibility and financial ation? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), oQuest database. ys wanted to know about CSR (but were afraid al responsibility (CSR),’ Ethical Corporation icalcorp.com/content.asp s Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical ty no Longer a Useful Concept ; refer Business on 25th/11/2008 Corporate social responsibility and financial ation? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), oQuest database. J 1985 “An empirical examination of the ponsibility and profitability”, The Academy of une, pp 446-43 International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfe

  16. Blackburn, V,

  17. Shrader, C 1994, Responsibility and the Consequences for Corp Managerial Issues”, Volume 6, no 2, pp 195-2 Globescan Inc 2005, Definition of corporate February 2007, http://www.globescan.com/rf_c

  18. McGuire, J, Sundregen, A and Scheeweis, T 1 firm financial performance ”, The Academy of pp 854-72.

  19. Orlitzky, M, scmidt, F&Rynes, S 2003, “Corpo Meta analysis” Organization Studies, Volume 2

  20. PJC, Parliamentary Joint Committee on Cor corporate responsibility: Managing risk and cr

  21. Tsoutoura, M 2004, Corporate Social Resp California University, Berkeley, March.

  22. Waddock, S and

  23. Graves, S 1997, “The C Performance Link ”, Strategic Management Jo

  24. 1994, “Investigating the Dimensions of Social Corporate Financial Performance”, Journal of

  25. 195-218. porate social responsibility survey, viewed 3 m/rf_csr_first_01.htm. s, T 1988, “Corporate social responsibility and my of Management Journal, Volume 31, no. 4, Corporate social and financial performance: A ume 24, no. 3, pp 403-11. n Corporations and Financial Services 2006, and creating value, June, Canberra. Responsibility and Financial Performance, The Corporate Social Performance-Financial nt Journal”, Volume 18, no. 4, pp 303-19

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list