Scholarly record
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DIFFERENT BIOCHAR FOR PROSPECTIVE USE IN PYROMETALLURGY AS REDUCTANTS
Abstract
The environmental impact of the long-standing fossil fuel, namely coke as a reducing agent has been a challenge in the pyrometallurgical industry for decades. The threats that it poses have become increasingly unbearable. Few attempts on different biochar have been conducted and their impact on the quality of slag investigated. More improvements are still underway for industrial scale use. The current project evolves on the reducing capabilities that spent malt waste biochar in the reduction zone during carbothermic reduction of basic manganese ores. X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy have been used for characterization. Alumina tube furnace was used for the experiment. The challenge that the malt waste biochar presents is mainly the size particles. It is in more powdery form which requires preconditioning to make its usage efficient. Amongst the possibilities is the formation of pellets that combine the fines of the biochar, ore fines and the use of binders that would not hinder the quality of the slag. In the present project, pellets were made of manganese ore fines, malt waste biochar fines and Altotech CB6 an organic binder. Results have revealed that spent malt waste biochar is indeed a reducing agent and that the impact of the ash is minimal. For the two temperatures experimented in this project namely 1200oC and 1300oC, XRD results have revealed that MnO did form which depicts a fast reduction stage as observed when metallurgical coke is used. Also, the presence of iron carbide was detected. Further, the fixed carbon in the malt waste biochar is very competitive compared to metallurgical coke. However, further studies are still required to investigate its behavior in the melting zone to assess the physical properties of slag especially its immiscibility with the metal.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References19
Saidur, R., Abdelaziz, E.A., Demirbas, A., Hossain, M.S. and Mekhilef, S., A review on biomass as fuel for boilers. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 15(5), pp.2262-2289, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.015
Bilgili, F., Ko�ak, E., Bulut, �. and Kuskaya, S., Can biomass energy be an efficient policy tool for sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, pp.830-845, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.109
Petrie, B., A case for biomass. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, 2014.
Toklu, E., Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 107, pp.235-244, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.008
Ragauskas, A.J., Williams, C.K., Davison, B.H., Britovsek, G., Cairney, J., Eckert, C.A., Frederick Jr, W.J., Hallett, J.P., Leak, D.J., Liotta, C.L. and Mielenz, J.R., The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. science, 311(5760), pp.484-489, 2006. DOI: 10.1126/science.1114736
Tursi, A., A review on biomass: importance, chemistry, classification, and conversion. Biofuel Research Journal, 6(2), pp.962-979, 2019. DOI: 10.18331/brj2019.6.2.3
Malico, I. and Gon�alves, A.C., Sources and Distribution of Forest Biomass for Energy. In Forest Bioenergy: From Wood Production to Energy Use (pp. 25-52). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-48224-3_2
Ehite, E.H., Abdoulmoumine, N., Woody and Herbaceous Biomass Feedstocks and Their Physical, Chemical, and Energy Properties. In: Bisaria, V. (eds) Handbook of Biorefinery Research and Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6724-9_55-1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6308-1_55
Anderson, W.F., Sarath, G., Edme, S., Casler, M.D., Mitchell, R.B., Tobias, C.M., Hale, A.L., Sattler, S.E. and Knoll, J.E., Dedicated herbaceous biomass feedstock genetics and development. BioEnergy Research, 9, pp.399-411, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s12155-015-9709-8
K�Otuto, G.O., Otieno, D.O., Seo, B., Ogindo, H.O. and Onyango, J.C., Carbon dioxide exchange and biomass productivity of the herbaceous layer of a managed tropical humid savanna ecosystem in western Kenya. Journal of Plant Ecology, 6(4), pp.286-297, 2013. DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rts038
Fahmy, T.Y., Fahmy, Y., Mobarak, F., El-Sakhawy, M. and Abou-Zeid, R.E., Biomass pyrolysis: past, present, and future. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, pp.17-32, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-018-0200-5
Grzegorz C., "Pyrolysis and Gasification of Biomass and Waste" Energies 15, no. 19: 7299. DOI: 10.3390/en15197299, 2022.
Kan, T., Strezov, V. and Evans, T.J., Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: A review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 57, pp.1126-1140, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185
Is�en, A., �znacar, K., Tun�, K.M. and G�nay, M.E., Exploring the critical factors of biomass pyrolysis for sustainable fuel production by machine learning. Sustainability, 15(20), p.14884, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/su152014884
Nyoni, B., Duma, S., Shabangu, S.V. and Hlangothi, S.P., Comparison of the slow pyrolysis behavior and kinetics of coal, wood and algae at high heating rates. Natural Resources Research, 29, pp.3943-3955, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11053-020-09687-3
Karkach, B., Tahiri, M., Haibi, A., Bouya, M. and Kifani-Sahban, F., Review on Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass for Biofuel Production from Date Palm. Applied Sciences, 13(18), p.10463, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/app131810463
Ighalo, J.O., Iwuchukwu, F.U., Eyankware, O.E., Iwuozor, K.O., Olotu, K., Bright, O.C. and Igwegbe, C.A., Flash pyrolysis of biomass: a review of recent advances. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24(8), pp.2349-2363, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-022-02339-5
Fan, X.H., Deng, Q., Gan, M. and Wang, H.B., Effect of biochar as reductant on magnetizing-roasting behavior of pyrite cinder. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 22(5), pp.371-376, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/s1006-706x(15)30014-5
Kayombo, G and MK Wa Kalenga, Palm nutshell biochar quality correlation with pyrolysis temperature, Proceedings SGEM Vienna Green, Vienna, Austria, pp. 101-108, 2022. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2/s18.13
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.