SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

3D GAME TECHNOLOGY IN PROPERTY FORMATION

Seipel, Stefan, Milutinovic, Goran, Andree, Martin

First published: 2016-06-28https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2016/b21/s08.068View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 3

Publication details

Title
3D GAME TECHNOLOGY IN PROPERTY FORMATION
Authors
Seipel, Stefan, Milutinovic, Goran, Andree, Martin
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016, Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2016
Pages
539-546
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-58-2
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References24
  1. J. Paulsson, ”Reasons for introducing 3D property in a legal system-Illustrated by the Swedish case,” Land Use Policy, vol. 33, pp. 195--203, 2013.

  2. J. Paasch et al., ”Integration of 3D Cadastre, 3D Property Formation and BIM in Sweden,” 3D cadastre workshop 2014, pp. 17--34, 2014.

  3. A. Aien, ”3D Cadastral Data Modelling,” 2013. Thesis, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne

  4. A. Navarro et al., ”Open Source 3D Game Engines for Serious Games Modeling,” Modeling and Simulation in Engineering, pp. 143--158, 2012.

  5. R. C. Mat et al., ”Using game engine for 3D terrain visualisation of GIS data: A review,” i IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2014.

  6. P. V. Arun, ”A comparative analysis of different DEM interpolation methods,” The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, vol. 16, pp. 133--139, 2013.

  7. N. Yokoya et al., ”Fractal-based analysis and interpolation of 3D natural surface shapes and their application to terrain modeling,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, vol. 46, 1989.

  8. A. Kobler et al., ”Repetitive interpolation: A robust algorithm for DTM generation from Aerial Laser Scanner Data in forested terrain,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 108, nr 1, pp. 9--23, 2007.

  9. N. Tate and F. Fisher, ”Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models,” Progress in Physical Geography, vol. 30, nr 4, pp. 467--489, 2006.

  10. P. J. J. Desmet, ”Effects of Interpolation Errors on the Analysis of DEMs,” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, vol. 22, pp. 563--580, 1997.

  11. M. Gallay et al., ”Using geographically weighted regression for analysing elevation error of detailed digital elevation models,” Accuracy 2010 Symposium, pp. 310--314, 2010.

  12. A. Fotheringham et al., Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships, Wiley, 2002. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016 www.sgem.org

  13. J. Paulsson, ”Reasons for introducing 3D property in a legal system-Illustrated by the Swedish case,” Land Use Policy, vol. 33, pp. 195--203, 2013.

  14. J. Paasch et al., ”Integration of 3D Cadastre, 3D Property Formation and BIM in Sweden,” 3D cadastre workshop 2014, pp. 17--34, 2014.

  15. A. Aien, ”3D Cadastral Data Modelling,” 2013. Thesis, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne

  16. A. Navarro et al., ”Open Source 3D Game Engines for Serious Games Modeling,” Modeling and Simulation in Engineering, pp. 143--158, 2012.

  17. R. C. Mat et al., ”Using game engine for 3D terrain visualisation of GIS data: A review,” i IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2014.

  18. P. V. Arun, ”A comparative analysis of different DEM interpolation methods,” The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, vol. 16, pp. 133--139, 2013.

  19. N. Yokoya et al., ”Fractal-based analysis and interpolation of 3D natural surface shapes and their application to terrain modeling,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, vol. 46, 1989.

  20. A. Kobler et al., ”Repetitive interpolation: A robust algorithm for DTM generation from Aerial Laser Scanner Data in forested terrain,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 108, nr 1, pp. 9--23, 2007.

  21. N. Tate and F. Fisher, ”Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models,” Progress in Physical Geography, vol. 30, nr 4, pp. 467--489, 2006.

  22. P. J. J. Desmet, ”Effects of Interpolation Errors on the Analysis of DEMs,” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, vol. 22, pp. 563--580, 1997.

  23. M. Gallay et al., ”Using geographically weighted regression for analysing elevation error of detailed digital elevation models,” Accuracy 2010 Symposium, pp. 310--314, 2010.

  24. A. Fotheringham et al., Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships, Wiley, 2002. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016 www.sgem.org

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list