SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

CEMENT PRODUCTION IN RUSSIA: BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR USING ALTERNATIVE FUELS

И. О. Тихонова

First published: 2019-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/5.1/s20.009View metrics

Abstract

Cement is the second most-consumed resource in the world, with more than 4 billion tonnes of the material produced globally every year. The cement production is considered to be one of major polluters regulated by Best Available Techniques (BAT) both in Europe and the Russian Federation. At the same time, cement industry generates greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions both of the ?energy? and ?process? origin. In Russia, climate legislation is just being formed, but operators of cement installations have already begun looking for economically feasible solutions for reducing CO2 emissions. In Europe, conventional fuels are often replaced by waste fuels, derived from pre-treated and sorted waste fractions including solid and liquid recovered fuels, and/or biomass. The use of waste (to partially substitute raw materials as well as conventional fuels) is considered to be BAT for the cement manufacturing process. For Russian cement plants, this fact opens economic advantages as well as opportunities for greening production, though practitioners are concerned about the possible growth in emissions of ?ordinary? pollutants such as sulphur and nitrogen oxides as well as dust. The article describes results of quantitative estimation of emissions (CO2, SO2, NOx) after the partial replacement of the natural gas with wood chips, wood powder and sunflower pellets (burnt exclusively in the calciner). The calculations were made under the assumption that the specific heat consumption (heat rate) does not change while obtaining 7 ? 15% of heat needed by burning the alternative fuel. The estimated data show that the replacement of natural gas with 7.5 ? 15% of alternative fuel leads to a decrease in the total end-of-pipe gas emissions by 0 ? 0.56% (mass) and 0.09 ? 1.04% (volume release). The use of wood chips in 7.5 to 15% amount out of the total heat rate for firing 1 kg of clinker leads to the decrease in total gas emissions (by mass) from the kiln system by 0 ?0.49%, SO2 emissions: by 0.16 ? 0.27%, NO2 emissions: by 0.29 ? 0.67% and NO emissions: by 0.25 ? 1.24%. Emissions of CO2 will reduce by 0 ? 0.52 % physically and 7.5 ? 15.5 % reporting wise. The use of sunflower pellets in 7.5 to 15% amount out of the total heat rate for burning 1 kg of clinker leads to a decrease in total gas emissions (by mass) from the kiln system by 0.28 ? 0.56%, SO2 emissions: by 0.55 ? 0.97%, NO2 emissions: by 0.48 ? 1.06, and NO emissions: by 0.43 ?1.54%. Emissions of CO2 will decrease by 0 ? 0.26%; for reporting purposes, the decrease will reach 7.5 ? 15.76 %. The use of wood powder in 5 to 15 % amount out of the total heat rate for firing 1 kg of clinker leads to the decrease in total gas emissions (by mass) from the kiln system by 0.23-0.68 %, ??2 emissions: by 0.25 ? 0.76 % while simultaneously increasing SO2 emissions by 0.23 ? 0.68 %. NOx emissions decrease in proportion to the amount of main process fuel burned in the nozzle of a rotary kiln. Since alternative fuels will be supplied to the rotary kiln zone with a temperature of 1100?1200 °C and excess air (oxygen) content in a vaporous phase, the phenol-formaldehyde resins within wood fuel additives will undergo the process of complete oxidative decomposition and combustion. No additional emissions of organic substances (phenol-formaldehyde resins decomposition products) are expected. Kiln dust emissions depend primarily on the efficiency of end-of-pipe techniques used to treat stack gases, and will not change when replacing natural gas with fuel additives. At the same time, using fuel additives will contribute towards reducing GHG emissions of cement production and meet requirements of the emerging GHG legislation (regulation system) to be introduced in 2019-2020.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
CEMENT PRODUCTION IN RUSSIA: BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR USING ALTERNATIVE FUELS
Authors
И. О. Тихонова
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2019, Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
71-80
SWS Citekey
Tikhonova2019207180
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-84-3
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Development Strategy for the Industry for Treatment, Disposal and Decontamination of Production and Consumption Waste for the Period up to 2030. URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/y8PMkQGZLfbY7jhn6QMruaKoferAowzJ.pdf (reference date: 29.03.2019) (in Russian)

  2. State Report 'On the Status and Protection of the Environment of the Russian Federation in 2017’. Moscow: Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment of the Russian, NPP 'Kadastr', 2018. 888 pp. (in Russian)

  3. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide. European Commission. 2013. URL: http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/CLM_Published_def.pdf. (reference date: 29.03.2019)

  4. Tokheim, L.A.Burning Chamber Installation for Increased Use of Alternative Fuels at Norcem, Brevik, Norway. In: World Cement. 2011. No11. Pp. 205-218.

  5. European Cement Research Academy (ECRA), Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI). Development of State of the Art – Techniques in Cement Manufacturing: Trying to Look Ahead. Düsseldorf, Germany, 2009.

  6. An ENERGY STAR® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers URL: https://www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/tools/ENERGY%20STAR%20Guide%20for%20the%20Cement%20Industry%2027_08_2013_Rev%20js%20reformat%2011192014.pdf. (reference date: 29.03.2019)

  7. Bakhtyar B., Kacemi T., Md Atif N. Review on Carbon Emissions in Malaysian Cement Industry. In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2017. No 7(3). Pp. 282-286.

  8. Ke, J., McNeil, M., Price, L., Khanna, N.Z., Zhou, N. Estimation of CO2 emissions from China’s cement production: methodologies and uncertainties. In: Energy Policy. 2013. No 57. Pp. 172-181.

  9. Madlool, N.A., Saidur, R., Hossain, M.S., Rahim, N.A. A critical review on energy use and savings in the cement industries. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011. No 15(4). Pp. 2042-2060.

  10. Tikhonova I., Guseva T., Molchanova Ya., Vartanyan M., Makarov N. Best Available Techniques, Emission Limit Values and Environmental Self-Monitoring Requirements: Challenges to Russian Industries. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM. 2018. Vol. 18. Is. 5-1. Pp. 121-128.

  11. Sivkov S., Potapova E. Selecting Environmental Marker Parameters for the Reference Book on Best Available Techniques of Cement Production. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM. 2016. Book 5. Vol. 2. Part B. Pp. 727-734.

  12. ITS 4-2016. Information and Technical Reference Document for the Production of Ceramic Goods. Moscow, 2016. URL: http://burondt.ru/NDT/NDTDocsDetail.php?UrlId=490&etkstructure_id=1872. (reference date: 29.03.2019) (in Russian)

  13. Pini M., Ferrari A. M., Gamberini R., Neri P., Rimini B. Life cycle assessment of a large, thin ceramic tile with advantageous technological properties. In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2014. No 19. Pp.1567-1580.

  14. Gibbs M. J., Soyka P., Conneely D. CO2 Emissions from Cement Production. Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. 2002. Pp. 175-182.

  15. Engin T., Ari V. Energy Auditing and Recovery for a Dry Type Cement Rotary Kilns System. In: Energy Conversion and Management. 2005. No 46. Pp.551-562.

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 1

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database